Literature DB >> 33903908

Faster Lumbar Spine Bone Loss in Midlife Predicts Subsequent Fracture Independent of Starting Bone Mineral Density.

Albert Shieh1, Arun S Karlamangla1, Mei-Hua Huang1, Weijuan Han1, Gail A Greendale1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Bone mineral density (BMD) decreases rapidly during menopause transition (MT), and continues to decline in postmenopause.
OBJECTIVE: This work aims to examine whether faster BMD loss during the combined MT and early postmenopause is associated with incident fracture, independent of starting BMD, before the MT.
METHODS: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation, a longitudinal cohort study, included 451 women, initially premenopausal or early perimenopausal, and those transitioned to postmenopause. Main outcome measures included time to first fracture after early postmenopause.
RESULTS: In Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for age, body mass index, race/ethnicity, study site, use of vitamin D and calcium supplements, and use of bone-detrimental or -beneficial medications, each SD decrement in lumbar spine (LS) BMD before MT was associated with a 78% increment in fracture hazard (P = .007). Each 1% per year faster decline in LS BMD was related to a 56% greater fracture hazard (P = .04). Rate of LS BMD decline predicted future fracture, independent of starting BMD. Women with a starting LS BMD below the sample median, and an LS BMD decline rate faster than the sample median had a 2.7-fold greater fracture hazard (P = .03). At the femoral neck, neither starting BMD nor rate of BMD decline was associated with fracture.
CONCLUSION: At the LS, starting BMD before the MT and rate of decline during the combined MT and early postmenopause are independent risk factors for fracture. Women with a below-median starting LS BMD and a faster-than-median LS BMD decline have the greatest fracture risk.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone mineral density; fracture; general population studies; menopause

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33903908      PMCID: PMC8208668          DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  55 in total

Review 1.  Time-dependent covariates in the Cox proportional-hazards regression model.

Authors:  L D Fisher; D Y Lin
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 2.  Bone Health During the Menopause Transition and Beyond.

Authors:  Arun S Karlamangla; Sherri-Ann M Burnett-Bowie; Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS- 2020 UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.

Authors:  Pauline M Camacho; Steven M Petak; Neil Binkley; Dima L Diab; Leslie S Eldeiry; Azeez Farooki; Steven T Harris; Daniel L Hurley; Jennifer Kelly; E Michael Lewiecki; Rachel Pessah-Pollack; Michael McClung; Sunil J Wimalawansa; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Felicia Cosman; Daria B Crittenden; Jonathan D Adachi; Neil Binkley; Edward Czerwinski; Serge Ferrari; Lorenz C Hofbauer; Edith Lau; E Michael Lewiecki; Akimitsu Miyauchi; Cristiano A F Zerbini; Cassandra E Milmont; Li Chen; Judy Maddox; Paul D Meisner; Cesar Libanati; Andreas Grauer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Bone loss and the risk of non-vertebral fractures in women and men: the Tromsø study.

Authors:  L A Ahmed; N Emaus; G K Berntsen; A Bjørnerem; V Fønnebø; L Jørgensen; H Schirmer; J Størmer; R M Joakimsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Individuals who sustain nonosteoporotic fractures continue to also sustain fragility fractures.

Authors:  M K Karlsson; R Hasserius; K J Obrant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Low bone mass and fast rate of bone loss at menopause: equal risk factors for future fracture: a 15-year follow-up study.

Authors:  B J Riis; M A Hansen; A M Jensen; K Overgaard; C Christiansen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Stop (mis)classifying fractures as high- or low-trauma or as fragility fractures.

Authors:  S R Cummings; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Katie L Stone; Dana G Seeley; Li-Yung Lui; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Warren S Browner; Michael C Nevitt; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Repeat bone mineral density screening and prediction of hip and major osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  Sarah D Berry; Elizabeth J Samelson; Michael J Pencina; Robert R McLean; L Adrienne Cupples; Kerry E Broe; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prediabetes and insulin resistance are associated with lower trabecular bone score (TBS): cross-sectional results from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation TBS Study.

Authors:  Albert Shieh; Gail A Greendale; Jane A Cauley; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierriez; Sioban D Harlow; Joel S Finkelstein; Diana Liao; Mei-Hua Huang; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.071

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.