Literature DB >> 27641143

Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis.

Felicia Cosman1, Daria B Crittenden1, Jonathan D Adachi1, Neil Binkley1, Edward Czerwinski1, Serge Ferrari1, Lorenz C Hofbauer1, Edith Lau1, E Michael Lewiecki1, Akimitsu Miyauchi1, Cristiano A F Zerbini1, Cassandra E Milmont1, Li Chen1, Judy Maddox1, Paul D Meisner1, Cesar Libanati1, Andreas Grauer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds sclerostin, increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption.
METHODS: We enrolled 7180 postmenopausal women who had a T score of -2.5 to -3.5 at the total hip or femoral neck. Patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous injections of romosozumab (at a dose of 210 mg) or placebo monthly for 12 months; thereafter, patients in each group received denosumab for 12 months, at a dose of 60 mg, administered subcutaneously every 6 months. The coprimary end points were the cumulative incidences of new vertebral fractures at 12 months and 24 months. Secondary end points included clinical (a composite of nonvertebral and symptomatic vertebral) and nonvertebral fractures.
RESULTS: At 12 months, new vertebral fractures had occurred in 16 of 3321 patients (0.5%) in the romosozumab group, as compared with 59 of 3322 (1.8%) in the placebo group (representing a 73% lower risk with romosozumab; P<0.001). Clinical fractures had occurred in 58 of 3589 patients (1.6%) in the romosozumab group, as compared with 90 of 3591 (2.5%) in the placebo group (a 36% lower risk with romosozumab; P=0.008). Nonvertebral fractures had occurred in 56 of 3589 patients (1.6%) in the romosozumab group and in 75 of 3591 (2.1%) in the placebo group (P=0.10). At 24 months, the rates of vertebral fractures were significantly lower in the romosozumab group than in the placebo group after each group made the transition to denosumab (0.6% [21 of 3325 patients] in the romosozumab group vs. 2.5% [84 of 3327] in the placebo group, a 75% lower risk with romosozumab; P<0.001). Adverse events, including instances of hyperostosis, cardiovascular events, osteoarthritis, and cancer, appeared to be balanced between the groups. One atypical femoral fracture and two cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were observed in the romosozumab group.
CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, romosozumab was associated with a lower risk of vertebral fracture than placebo at 12 months and, after the transition to denosumab, at 24 months. The lower risk of clinical fracture that was seen with romosozumab was evident at 1 year. (Funded by Amgen and UCB Pharma; FRAME ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01575834 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27641143     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  304 in total

Review 1.  The next step after anti-osteoporotic drug discontinuation: an up-to-date review of sequential treatment.

Authors:  Núria Guañabens; María Jesús Moro-Álvarez; Enrique Casado; Josep Blanch-Rubió; Carlos Gómez-Alonso; Guillermo Martínez Díaz-Guerra; Javier Del Pino-Montes; Carmen Valero Díaz de Lamadrid; Pilar Peris; Manuel Muñoz-Torres
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Sclerostin inhibition alleviates breast cancer-induced bone metastases and muscle weakness.

Authors:  Eric Hesse; Saskia Schröder; Diana Brandt; Jenny Pamperin; Hiroaki Saito; Hanna Taipaleenmäki
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-04-09

Review 3.  Current Status of Bone-Forming Therapies for the Management of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Koldkjær Sølling; Torben Harsløf; Bente Langdahl
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  Wnt signaling in cardiovascular disease: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Austin Gay; Dwight A Towler
Journal:  Curr Opin Lipidol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.776

Review 5.  Drug development in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Sarah A Dugger; Adam Platt; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 6.  Osteoporosis, bone mineral density and CKD-MBD: treatment considerations.

Authors:  Jordi Bover; Lucía Bailone; Víctor López-Báez; Silvia Benito; Paola Ciceri; Andrea Galassi; Mario Cozzolino
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 7.  Osteogenesis imperfecta and therapeutics.

Authors:  Roy Morello
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 11.583

8.  Low Dose of Bisphosphonate Enhances Sclerostin Antibody-Induced Trabecular Bone Mass Gains in Brtl/+ Osteogenesis Imperfecta Mouse Model.

Authors:  Diana Olvera; Rachel Stolzenfeld; Joan C Marini; Michelle S Caird; Kenneth M Kozloff
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Site specific measurements of bone formation using [18F] sodium fluoride PET/CT.

Authors:  Glen M Blake; Tanuj Puri; Musib Siddique; Michelle L Frost; Amelia E B Moore; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 10.  Updates in CKD-Associated Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Pascale Khairallah; Thomas L Nickolas
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.