Literature DB >> 8830981

Low bone mass and fast rate of bone loss at menopause: equal risk factors for future fracture: a 15-year follow-up study.

B J Riis1, M A Hansen, A M Jensen, K Overgaard, C Christiansen.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the role of peak bone mass and rate of postmenopausal bone loss for the subsequent risk of osteoporotic fracture. 182 women within 3 years of menopause were followed longitudinally for 15 years. Over the first 2 years, forearm bone mass (single photon absorptiometry) was measured nine times, the rate of bone loss was calculated, and the women were stratified into a group of "fast bone losers" (n = 49) and a group of "normal bone losers" (n = 133). Later, bone mass was also measured in the lumbar spine and hip with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. At 15 years, the fast losers had significantly lower body weight (4.4 kG; p < 0.05) than the normal losers. Furthermore, the fast losers had significantly increased values of bone turnover (osteocalcin and C-terminal type I collagen breakdown products). In both the forearm, spine, and hip, the fast bone losers had at all sites significantly less bone mass than the normal bone losers (p < 0.001). 23 women had experienced a peripheral (Colles') fracture and 25 a spinal fracture. The fracture groups had generally significantly (p < 0.05) less bone mass than the group without fracture, both in the forearm, spine, and hip and they also had the highest rate of bone loss after menopause (p < 0.05). Baseline bone mass and rate of loss predisposed to the same extent to fractures with ODD's ratios of about 2. If both low bone mass and rate of loss were present, the ODD's ratio increased to about 3. We conclude that fast rate of bone loss and low bone mass are equally important for the risk of fracture. The identification of women at risk of osteoporosis should therefore consider both a measurement of bone mass status, and a determination of the postmenopausal rate of loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8830981     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(96)00102-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  70 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring hormone replacement therapy by biochemical markers of bone metabolism in menopausal women.

Authors:  E Dogan; C Posaci
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Bone turnover markers: use in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kim Naylor; Richard Eastell
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Quantitative trait locus on chromosome X affects bone loss after maturation in mice.

Authors:  Shuzo Okudaira; Motoyuki Shimizu; Bungo Otsuki; Rika Nakanishi; Akira Ohta; Keiichi Higuchi; Masanori Hosokawa; Tadao Tsuboyama; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Change in hip bone mineral density and risk of subsequent fractures in older men.

Authors:  Peggy M Cawthon; Susan K Ewing; Dawn C Mackey; Howard A Fink; Steven R Cummings; Kristine E Ensrud; Marcia L Stefanick; Doug C Bauer; Jane A Cauley; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover predict bone loss in perimenopausal women but not in postmenopausal women-the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.

Authors:  M Iki; A Morita; Y Ikeda; Y Sato; T Akiba; T Matsumoto; H Nishino; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Bone Health During the Menopause Transition and Beyond.

Authors:  Arun S Karlamangla; Sherri-Ann M Burnett-Bowie; Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Variability of vertebral and femoral postmenopausal bone loss: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  J M Pouillès; F Trémollières; C Ribot
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Who are candidates for prevention and treatment for osteoporosis?

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Bone loss and the risk of non-vertebral fractures in women and men: the Tromsø study.

Authors:  L A Ahmed; N Emaus; G K Berntsen; A Bjørnerem; V Fønnebø; L Jørgensen; H Schirmer; J Størmer; R M Joakimsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.