Kari Oline Bøifot1,2, Jostein Gohli1, Line Victoria Moen1, Marius Dybwad3,4. 1. Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, P.O. Box 25, NO-2027, Kjeller, Norway. 2. Department of Analytics, Environmental & Forensic Sciences, King's College London, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK. 3. Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, P.O. Box 25, NO-2027, Kjeller, Norway. marius.dybwad@ffi.no. 4. Department of Analytics, Environmental & Forensic Sciences, King's College London, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK. marius.dybwad@ffi.no.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aerosol microbiome research advances our understanding of bioaerosols, including how airborne microorganisms affect our health and surrounding environment. Traditional microbiological/molecular methods are commonly used to study bioaerosols, but do not allow for generic, unbiased microbiome profiling. Recent studies have adopted shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS) to address this issue. However, SMS requires relatively large DNA inputs, which are challenging when studying low biomass air environments, and puts high requirements on air sampling, sample processing and DNA isolation protocols. Previous SMS studies have consequently adopted various mitigation strategies, including long-duration sampling, sample pooling, and whole genome amplification, each associated with some inherent drawbacks/limitations. RESULTS: Here, we demonstrate a new custom, multi-component DNA isolation method optimized for SMS-based aerosol microbiome research. The method achieves improved DNA yields from filter-collected air samples by isolating DNA from the entire filter extract, and ensures a more comprehensive microbiome representation by combining chemical, enzymatic and mechanical lysis. Benchmarking against two state-of-the-art DNA isolation methods was performed with a mock microbial community and real-world air samples. All methods demonstrated similar performance regarding DNA yield and community representation with the mock community. However, with subway samples, the new method obtained drastically improved DNA yields, while SMS revealed that the new method reported higher diversity. The new method involves intermediate filter extract separation into a pellet and supernatant fraction. Using subway samples, we demonstrate that supernatant inclusion results in improved DNA yields. Furthermore, SMS of pellet and supernatant fractions revealed overall similar taxonomic composition but also identified differences that could bias the microbiome profile, emphasizing the importance of processing the entire filter extract. CONCLUSIONS: By demonstrating and benchmarking a new DNA isolation method optimized for SMS-based aerosol microbiome research with both a mock microbial community and real-world air samples, this study contributes to improved selection, harmonization, and standardization of DNA isolation methods. Our findings highlight the importance of ensuring end-to-end sample integrity and using methods with well-defined performance characteristics. Taken together, the demonstrated performance characteristics suggest the new method could be used to improve the quality of SMS-based aerosol microbiome research in low biomass air environments.
BACKGROUND: Aerosol microbiome research advances our understanding of bioaerosols, including how airborne microorganisms affect our health and surrounding environment. Traditional microbiological/molecular methods are commonly used to study bioaerosols, but do not allow for generic, unbiased microbiome profiling. Recent studies have adopted shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS) to address this issue. However, SMS requires relatively large DNA inputs, which are challenging when studying low biomass air environments, and puts high requirements on air sampling, sample processing and DNA isolation protocols. Previous SMS studies have consequently adopted various mitigation strategies, including long-duration sampling, sample pooling, and whole genome amplification, each associated with some inherent drawbacks/limitations. RESULTS: Here, we demonstrate a new custom, multi-component DNA isolation method optimized for SMS-based aerosol microbiome research. The method achieves improved DNA yields from filter-collected air samples by isolating DNA from the entire filter extract, and ensures a more comprehensive microbiome representation by combining chemical, enzymatic and mechanical lysis. Benchmarking against two state-of-the-art DNA isolation methods was performed with a mock microbial community and real-world air samples. All methods demonstrated similar performance regarding DNA yield and community representation with the mock community. However, with subway samples, the new method obtained drastically improved DNA yields, while SMS revealed that the new method reported higher diversity. The new method involves intermediate filter extract separation into a pellet and supernatant fraction. Using subway samples, we demonstrate that supernatant inclusion results in improved DNA yields. Furthermore, SMS of pellet and supernatant fractions revealed overall similar taxonomic composition but also identified differences that could bias the microbiome profile, emphasizing the importance of processing the entire filter extract. CONCLUSIONS: By demonstrating and benchmarking a new DNA isolation method optimized for SMS-based aerosol microbiome research with both a mock microbial community and real-world air samples, this study contributes to improved selection, harmonization, and standardization of DNA isolation methods. Our findings highlight the importance of ensuring end-to-end sample integrity and using methods with well-defined performance characteristics. Taken together, the demonstrated performance characteristics suggest the new method could be used to improve the quality of SMS-based aerosol microbiome research in low biomass air environments.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aerosol microbiome; Air sampling; DNA isolation; Shotgun metagenomic sequencing
Authors: Joan Cáliz; Xavier Triadó-Margarit; Lluís Camarero; Emilio O Casamayor Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Marcus H Y Leung; David Wilkins; Ellen K T Li; Fred K F Kong; Patrick K H Lee Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: X Triadó-Margarit; M Veillette; C Duchaine; M Talbot; F Amato; M C Minguillón; V Martins; E de Miguel; E O Casamayor; T Moreno Journal: Indoor Air Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 5.770
Authors: Paula King; Long K Pham; Shannon Waltz; Dan Sphar; Robert T Yamamoto; Douglas Conrad; Randy Taplitz; Francesca Torriani; R Allyn Forsyth Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tham T Nguyen; Mee K Poh; Jenny Low; Shirin Kalimuddin; Koh C Thoon; Wai C Ng; Benjamin D Anderson; Gregory C Gray Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2016-12-26 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Jessica Y Choi; Juliana Zemke; Sarah E Philo; Emily S Bailey; Myagmarsukh Yondon; Gregory C Gray Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2018-06-14
Authors: M H Y Leung; X Tong; K O Bøifot; D Bezdan; D J Butler; D C Danko; J Gohli; D C Green; M T Hernandez; F J Kelly; S Levy; G Mason-Buck; M Nieto-Caballero; D Syndercombe-Court; K Udekwu; B G Young; C E Mason; M Dybwad; P K H Lee Journal: Microbiome Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 14.650