Literature DB >> 33898909

Learning Experience Design in Health Professions Education: A Conceptual Review of Evidence for Educators.

Joann Pan1, Jessica Sheu1, Lauren Massimo2, Kevin R Scott3, Andrew W Phillips4.   

Abstract

The increasing use of online resources in emergency medicine (EM) education has driven demand for higher quality resources. Learning experience design (LED) is the study of how electronic user interfaces impact learner outcomes. We sought to summarize the evidence for LED principles to inform creation of EM educational resources. We performed scripted searches of MeSH terms, PubMed keywords, and hand tracings. Inclusion criteria were controlled studies using light-emitting diode or liquid crystal display monitors with Latin-based languages. Cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors were excluded because of the user experience confounders. Thirty-two articles met inclusion criteria. Overall, 14-point size significantly improved legibility compared to smaller font sizes. Similarly, Verdana and Arial typefaces significantly improved legibility compared to Times New Roman typeface. Verdana also significantly decreased subjective mental workload and visibility difficulty ratings and required the least eye movement of any typefaces tested. Positive polarity (dark text on light background) significantly improved reading outcomes across many measurements over negative polarity. There was higher character identification accuracy with higher luminance. Text effects (e.g., italics), interword and interletter spacing, and page presentation are among variables with mixed or minimal evidence. Learning experience design principles significantly impacted reading and learning outcomes in laboratory settings. No studies evaluated classroom outcomes. Recommendations for electronic learning environments are 14-point font with Verdana or Arial typeface with positive polarity (dark letters on light background). We recommend increasing screen brightness slightly. EM educators may significantly improve the speed and accuracy of learning written material by espousing evidence-based LED principles.
© 2020 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33898909      PMCID: PMC8052999          DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AEM Educ Train        ISSN: 2472-5390


  27 in total

1.  Increasing interletter spacing facilitates encoding of words.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gomez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Selection of the optimum font type and size interface for on screen continuous reading by young adults: an ergonomic approach.

Authors:  Jayeeta Banerjee; Moushum Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Hum Ergol (Tokyo)       Date:  2011-12

3.  Text - background polarity affects performance irrespective of ambient illumination and colour contrast.

Authors:  A Buchner; N Baumgartner
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Mobile computing with special reference to readability task under the impact of vibration, colour combination and gender.

Authors:  Zulquernain Mallick; Arshad Noor Siddiquee; Abid Haleem
Journal:  J Hum Ergol (Tokyo)       Date:  2008-12

5.  Numeral size, spacing between targets, and exposure time in discrimination by elderly people using an lcd monitor.

Authors:  Kuo-Chen Huang; Po-Chan Yeh
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2007-04

6.  A suggested core content for education scholarship fellowships in emergency medicine.

Authors:  Lalena M Yarris; Wendy C Coates; Michelle Lin; Karen Lind; Jaime Jordan; Sam Clarke; Todd A Guth; Sally A Santen; Stanley J Hamstra
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Free Open Access Meducation (FOAM): the rise of emergency medicine and critical care blogs and podcasts (2002-2013).

Authors:  Mike Cadogan; Brent Thoma; Teresa M Chan; Michelle Lin
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Text legibility and the letter superiority effect.

Authors:  James E Sheedy; Manoj V Subbaram; Aaron B Zimmerman; John R Hayes
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.888

9.  Using enhanced text to facilitate recognition of drug names: evidence from two experimental studies.

Authors:  Kraig L Schell
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.661

10.  Utilising psychophysical techniques to investigate the effects of age, typeface design, size and display polarity on glance legibility.

Authors:  Jonathan Dobres; Nadine Chahine; Bryan Reimer; David Gould; Bruce Mehler; Joseph F Coughlin
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.