Literature DB >> 33896779

The validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Arabic version of the pregnancy physical activity questionnaire.

Afnan S Younis1, Nada A Alyousefi1, Dina M Al-Habib1, Amal T Al-Omran1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To translate the pregnancy physical activity questionnaire (PPAQ) into Arabic language, cross-culturally adapt and test its reliability and validity among Saudi pregnant women.
METHODS: Pregnancy physical activity questionnaire, which consisted of 36 items, was translated to Arabic following the World Health Organization's guidelines for tool translation (forward translation, expert panel and back translation, pretesting and cognitive interviewing, and final version), followed by validation by experts. This is a cross-sectional study and data were collected from 118 healthy pregnant Saudi women from May to June 2019. Validity included content validity indices (CVI) and construct validity by Rasch analysis. Reliability was assessed by test-retest reliability and Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 30.15 ± 5.59 years; 38.2% of them had normal pre-gestational body mass index (n=45). The median of total energy expenditure in physical activity was 356.1 METs.h/week (IQR=162.3-648.3). Item content validity index was good ranging between 0.8-1. Rasch analysis showed good construct validity and excellent reliability for all types of physical activity (>0.89).
CONCLUSION: This Arabic PPAQ is a reliable and valid tool that can be used in Arab countries. Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabic; Rasch analysis; Saudi women; pregnancy physical activity questionnaire; reliability; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33896779      PMCID: PMC9149697          DOI: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.5.20200826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Med J        ISSN: 0379-5284            Impact factor:   1.422


  26 in total

Review 1.  The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?

Authors:  Alan Tennant; Philip G Conaghan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-12-15

Review 2.  Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.

Authors:  Denise F Polit; Cheryl Tatano Beck; Steven V Owen
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 3.  Leisure time physical activity and the risk of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review.

Authors:  H T Wolf; K M Owe; M Juhl; H K Hegaard
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-05

4.  Development and validation of a Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Authors:  Lisa Chasan-Taber; Michael D Schmidt; Dawn E Roberts; David Hosmer; Glenn Markenson; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 5.  Physical activity and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dagfinn Aune; Ola Didrik Saugstad; Tore Henriksen; Serena Tonstad
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Reliability and Validity of a Chinese-Translated Version of a Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Authors:  Mi Xiang; Massayuki Konishi; Huanhuan Hu; Masaki Takahashi; Wenbi Fan; Mio Nishimaki; Karina Ando; Hyeon-Ki Kim; Hiroki Tabata; Takashi Arao; Shizuo Sakamoto
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-09

7.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 8.  A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires.

Authors:  Hendrik J F Helmerhorst; Søren Brage; Janet Warren; Herve Besson; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  The association of daily physical activity and birth outcome: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Marieke I Both; Mathilde A Overvest; Mark F Wildhagen; Jean Golding; Hajo I J Wildschut
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Physical activity before and during pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Deirdre K Tobias; Cuilin Zhang; Rob M van Dam; Katherine Bowers; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability of a Serbian Version (PPAQ-SRB).

Authors:  Marija Rovcanin; Svetlana Jankovic; Zeljko Mikovic; Sandra Sipetic Grujicic; Ivana Rudic Biljic Ersk; Milan Lackovic; Dejan Dimitrijevic; Sara Simanic; Isidora Vujcic
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.