Literature DB >> 27112554

Reliability and Validity of a Chinese-Translated Version of a Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Mi Xiang1, Massayuki Konishi2, Huanhuan Hu3, Masaki Takahashi4, Wenbi Fan5, Mio Nishimaki3, Karina Ando3, Hyeon-Ki Kim3, Hiroki Tabata3, Takashi Arao2, Shizuo Sakamoto2.   

Abstract

Objectives The objectives of the present study were to translate the English version of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire into Chinese (PPAQ-C) and to determine its reliability and validity for use by pregnant Chinese women. Methods The study included 224 pregnant women during their first, second, or third trimesters of pregnancy who completed the PPAQ-C on their first visit and wore a uniaxial accelerometer (Lifecorder; Suzuken Co. Ltd) for 7 days. One week after the first visit, we collected the data from the uniaxial accelerometer records, and the women were asked to complete the PPAQ-C again. Results We used intraclass correlation coefficients to determine the reliability of the PPAQ-C. The intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.77 for total activity (light and above), 0.76 for sedentary activity, 0.75 for light activity, 0.59 for moderate activity, and 0.28 for vigorous activity. The intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.74 for "household and caregiving", 0.75 for "occupational" activities, and 0.34 for "sports/exercise". Validity between the PPAQ-C and accelerometer data was determined by Spearman correlation coefficients. Although there were no significant correlations for moderate activity (r = 0.19, P > 0.05) or vigorous activity (r = 0.15, P > 0.05), there were significant correlations for total activity [light and above; r = 0.35, P < 0.01)] and for light activity (r = 0.33, P < 0.01). Conclusions for Practice The PPAQ-C is reliable and moderately accurate for measuring physical activity in pregnant Chinese women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometer; Activity assessment; Physical activity; Pregnancy; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27112554     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-016-2008-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  24 in total

1.  The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry.

Authors:  Hideaki Kumahara; Yves Schutz; Makoto Ayabe; Mayumi Yoshioka; Yutaka Yoshitake; Munehiro Shindo; Kojiro Ishii; Hiroaki Tanaka
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Validation of the Kenz Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph GT1M accelerometers for walking and running in adults.

Authors:  Mark G Abel; James C Hannon; Katie Sell; Tia Lillie; Geri Conlin; David Anderson
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.665

3.  Development and validation of a Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Authors:  Lisa Chasan-Taber; Michael D Schmidt; Dawn E Roberts; David Hosmer; Glenn Markenson; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  A case-control study of maternal recreational physical activity and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jennifer C Dempsey; Carole L Butler; Tanya K Sorensen; I-Min Lee; Mary Lou Thompson; Raymond S Miller; Ihunnaya O Frederick; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.602

5.  Association of maternal gestational weight gain with short- and long-term maternal and child health outcomes.

Authors:  Claire E Margerison Zilko; David Rehkopf; Barbara Abrams
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Can physical activity reduce excessive gestational weight gain? Findings from a Chinese urban pregnant women cohort study.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Xu Qian; Mu Li; Henry Lynn; Yanyan Fan; Hongyi Jiang; Fengling He; Gengsheng He
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  French Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire compared with an accelerometer cut point to classify physical activity among pregnant obese women.

Authors:  Nadia Chandonnet; Didier Saey; Natalie Alméras; Isabelle Marc
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Leisure time physical exercise during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort.

Authors:  M Madsen; T Jørgensen; M L Jensen; M Juhl; J Olsen; P K Andersen; A-M Nybo Andersen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Physical activity level of urban pregnant women in Tianjin, China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Shengwen Dong; Jianhua Zuo; Xiangqin Hu; Hua Zhang; Yue Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Changes in Socioeconomic Inequality of Low Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Shaanxi Province of Northwest China, 2010-2013: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Leilei Pei; Yijun Kang; Yaling Zhao; Yue Cheng; Hong Yan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  11 in total

1.  The Association between Dietary Patterns and Pre-Pregnancy BMI with Gestational Weight Gain: The "Born in Shenyang" Cohort.

Authors:  Jiajin Hu; Ming Gao; Yanan Ma; Ningyu Wan; Yilin Liu; Borui Liu; Lin Li; Yang Yu; Yang Liu; Bohan Liu; Deliang Wen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 6.706

2.  The validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Arabic version of the pregnancy physical activity questionnaire.

Authors:  Afnan S Younis; Nada A Alyousefi; Dina M Al-Habib; Amal T Al-Omran
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.422

3.  Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.

Authors:  Matteo C Sattler; Johannes Jaunig; Estelle D Watson; Mireille N M van Poppel; Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Pavel Dietz
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Physical activity and dietary intake among Chinese pregnant women: an observational study.

Authors:  Mi Xiang; Jing Zhang; Huigang Liang; Zhiruo Zhang; Masayuki Konishi; Huanhuan Hu; Mio Nishimaki; Hyeon-Ki Kim; Hiroki Tabata; Hisao Shimizu; Takashi Arao; Shizuo Sakamoto
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Physical Activity Level during Pregnancy in South Africa: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Uchenna Benedine Okafor; Daniel Ter Goon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Translation and cultural adaptation of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire into Danish using the dual-panel approach: comparison with outcomes from an alternative translation approach.

Authors:  Jannie Tygesen Schmidt; Josephine Nielsen; Allan Riis; Birgit Tine Larsen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2021-06-03

7.  Association of Maternal Dietary Patterns during Pregnancy and Offspring Weight Status across Infancy: Results from a Prospective Birth Cohort in China.

Authors:  Jiajin Hu; Izzuddin M Aris; Pi-I D Lin; Ningyu Wan; Yilin Liu; Yinuo Wang; Deliang Wen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Dietary patterns during pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes: a prospective cohort study in Western China.

Authors:  Jonathan K L Mak; Ngoc Minh Pham; Andy H Lee; Li Tang; Xiong-Fei Pan; Colin W Binns; Xin Sun
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Pregnancy physical activity questionnaire (PPAQ): Translation and cross cultural adaption of an Arabic version.

Authors:  Tatiana Papazian; Nada El Osta; Hala Hout; Daisy El Chammas; Nour El Helou; Hassan Younes; Georges Abi Tayeh; Lydia Rabbaa Khabbaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  When and How Should Chinese Pregnant Women Exercise? A Longitudinal Study in China.

Authors:  Mi Xiang; Masayuki Konishi; Huanhuan Hu; Mio Nishimaki; Hyeon-Ki Kim; Hiroki Tabata; Hisao Shimizu; Yue Fang; Xueyuan Li; Jiawei Xu; Zhiruo Zhang; Huigang Liang; Takashi Arao; Shizuo Sakamoto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.