Literature DB >> 22938557

A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires.

Hendrik J F Helmerhorst1, Søren Brage, Janet Warren, Herve Besson, Ulf Ekelund.   

Abstract

Physical inactivity is one of the four leading risk factors for global mortality. Accurate measurement of physical activity (PA) and in particular by physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) remains a challenge. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated systematic review of the reliability and validity characteristics of existing and more recently developed PAQs and to quantitatively compare the performance between existing and newly developed PAQs.A literature search of electronic databases was performed for studies assessing reliability and validity data of PAQs using an objective criterion measurement of PA between January 1997 and December 2011. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and data were extracted to provide a systematic overview of measurement properties. Due to differences in reported outcomes and criterion methods a quantitative meta-analysis was not possible.In total, 31 studies testing 34 newly developed PAQs, and 65 studies examining 96 existing PAQs were included. Very few PAQs showed good results on both reliability and validity. Median reliability correlation coefficients were 0.62-0.71 for existing, and 0.74-0.76 for new PAQs. Median validity coefficients ranged from 0.30-0.39 for existing, and from 0.25-0.41 for new PAQs.Although the majority of PAQs appear to have acceptable reliability, the validity is moderate at best. Newly developed PAQs do not appear to perform substantially better than existing PAQs in terms of reliability and validity. Future PAQ studies should include measures of absolute validity and the error structure of the instrument.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22938557      PMCID: PMC3492158          DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act        ISSN: 1479-5868            Impact factor:   6.457


  124 in total

1.  An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults.

Authors:  N D Harada; V Chiu; A C King; A L Stewart
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field.

Authors:  D Hendelman; K Miller; C Baggett; E Debold; P Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  A systematic approach to selecting an appropriate measure of self-reported physical activity or sedentary behavior.

Authors:  Barbara Sternfeld; Lisa Goldman-Rosas
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2012-01

4.  Reliability and validity of a school recess physical activity recall in Spanish youth.

Authors:  David Martínez-Gómez; M Andres Calabro; Gregory J Welk; Ascension Marcos; Oscar L Veiga
Journal:  Pediatr Exerc Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.333

5.  Reliability and validity of YRBS physical activity items among middle school students.

Authors:  Philip J Troped; Jean L Wiecha; Maren S Fragala; Charles E Matthews; Daniel M Finkelstein; Juhee Kim; Karen E Peterson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 6.  A comparison of indirect versus direct measures for assessing physical activity in the pediatric population: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kristi B Adamo; Stéphanie A Prince; Andrea C Tricco; Sarah Connor-Gorber; Mark Tremblay
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Obes       Date:  2009

7.  Concurrent validity of a modified version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-A) in European adolescents: The HELENA Study.

Authors:  M Hagströmer; P Bergman; I De Bourdeaudhuij; F B Ortega; J R Ruiz; Y Manios; J P Rey-López; K Phillipp; J von Berlepsch; M Sjöström
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Simultaneous validation of ten physical activity questionnaires in older men: a doubly labeled water study.

Authors:  M Bonnefoy; S Normand; C Pachiaudi; J R Lacour; M Laville; T Kostka
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  The International Physical Activity Questionnaire modified for the elderly: aspects of validity and feasibility.

Authors:  Anita Hurtig-Wennlöf; Maria Hagströmer; Lovisa A Olsson
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 10.  Recommendations to improve the accuracy of estimates of physical activity derived from self report.

Authors:  Barbara E Ainsworth; Carl J Caspersen; Charles E Matthews; Louise C Mâsse; Tom Baranowski; Weimo Zhu
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2012-01
View more
  231 in total

1.  Objectively measured sedentary time and physical activity and associations with body weight gain: does body weight determine a decline in moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity?

Authors:  U Ekelund; E Kolle; J Steene-Johannessen; K E Dalene; A K O Nilsen; S A Anderssen; B H Hansen
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Measuring Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Youth with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Bonny Rockette-Wagner; Kristi L Storti; Sharon Edelstein; Linda M Delahanty; Bryan Galvin; Alexandra Jackson; Andrea M Kriska
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.992

3.  The development and validation of a golf swing and putt skill assessment for children.

Authors:  Lisa M Barnett; Louise L Hardy; Ali S Brian; Sam Robertson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Validation of the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire classification coding system using accelerometer assessment among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Steve Amireault; Gaston Godin; Jason Lacombe; Catherine M Sabiston
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 5.  Tests examining skill outcomes in sport: a systematic review of measurement properties and feasibility.

Authors:  Samuel J Robertson; Angus F Burnett; Jodie Cochrane
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Validity and Reliability of Field-Based Measures for Assessing Movement Skill Competency in Lifelong Physical Activities: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ryan M Hulteen; Natalie J Lander; Philip J Morgan; Lisa M Barnett; Samuel J Robertson; David R Lubans
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Pilot testing of a mindfulness- and acceptance-based intervention for increasing cardiorespiratory fitness in sedentary adults: A feasibility study.

Authors:  E C Martin; N Galloway-Williams; M G Cox; R A Winett
Journal:  J Contextual Behav Sci       Date:  2015-10

8.  Physical Activity and Survival in Women With Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Oxana Palesh; Charles Kamen; Susan Sharp; Ashleigh Golden; Eric Neri; David Spiegel; Cheryl Koopman
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.592

9.  Validation study of Polar V800 accelerometer.

Authors:  Adrián Hernández-Vicente; Alejandro Santos-Lozano; Katrien De Cocker; Nuria Garatachea
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-08

10.  Psychometric properties of the modified RESIDE physical activity questionnaire among low-income overweight women.

Authors:  Sydney A Jones; Kelly R Evenson; Larry F Johnston; Stewart G Trost; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; David A Jewell; Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Thomas C Keyserling
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.319

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.