Literature DB >> 33893345

A novel algorithm to detect non-wear time from raw accelerometer data using deep convolutional neural networks.

Shaheen Syed1, Bente Morseth2, Laila A Hopstock3, Alexander Horsch4.   

Abstract

To date, non-wear detection algorithms commonly employ a 30, 60, or even 90 mins interval or window in which acceleration values need to be below a threshold value. A major drawback of such intervals is that they need to be long enough to prevent false positives (type I errors), while short enough to prevent false negatives (type II errors), which limits detecting both short and longer episodes of non-wear time. In this paper, we propose a novel non-wear detection algorithm that eliminates the need for an interval. Rather than inspecting acceleration within intervals, we explore acceleration right before and right after an episode of non-wear time. We trained a deep convolutional neural network that was able to infer non-wear time by detecting when the accelerometer was removed and when it was placed back on again. We evaluate our algorithm against several baseline and existing non-wear algorithms, and our algorithm achieves a perfect precision, a recall of 0.9962, and an F1 score of 0.9981, outperforming all evaluated algorithms. Although our algorithm was developed using patterns learned from a hip-worn accelerometer, we propose algorithmic steps that can easily be applied to a wrist-worn accelerometer and a retrained classification model.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33893345     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87757-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  24 in total

1.  Raw and Count Data Comparability of Hip-Worn ActiGraph GT3X+ and Link Accelerometers.

Authors:  Alexander H K Montoye; M Benjamin Nelson; Joshua M Bock; Mary T Imboden; Leonard A Kaminsky; Kelly A Mackintosh; Melitta A McNarry; Karin A Pfeiffer
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm.

Authors:  Leena Choi; Zhouwen Liu; Charles E Matthews; Maciej S Buchowski
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research.

Authors:  Richard P Troiano; James J McClain; Robert J Brychta; Kong Y Chen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 4.  Calibration and validation of wearable monitors.

Authors:  David R Bassett; Alex Rowlands; Stewart G Trost
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 5.  Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges.

Authors:  I-Min Lee; Eric J Shiroma
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Large Scale Population Assessment of Physical Activity Using Wrist Worn Accelerometers: The UK Biobank Study.

Authors:  Aiden Doherty; Dan Jackson; Nils Hammerla; Thomas Plötz; Patrick Olivier; Malcolm H Granat; Tom White; Vincent T van Hees; Michael I Trenell; Christoper G Owen; Stephen J Preece; Rob Gillions; Simon Sheard; Tim Peakman; Soren Brage; Nicholas J Wareham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Jairo H Migueles; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Ulf Ekelund; Christine Delisle Nyström; Jose Mora-Gonzalez; Marie Löf; Idoia Labayen; Jonatan R Ruiz; Francisco B Ortega
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Sedentary Time and Physical Activity Surveillance Through Accelerometer Pooling in Four European Countries.

Authors:  Anne Loyen; Alexandra M Clarke-Cornwell; Sigmund A Anderssen; Maria Hagströmer; Luís B Sardinha; Kristina Sundquist; Ulf Ekelund; Jostein Steene-Johannessen; Fátima Baptista; Bjørge H Hansen; Katrien Wijndaele; Søren Brage; Jeroen Lakerveld; Johannes Brug; Hidde P van der Ploeg
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Evaluating the performance of raw and epoch non-wear algorithms using multiple accelerometers and electrocardiogram recordings.

Authors:  Shaheen Syed; Bente Morseth; Laila A Hopstock; Alexander Horsch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparability of accelerometer signal aggregation metrics across placements and dominant wrist cut points for the assessment of physical activity in adults.

Authors:  Jairo H Migueles; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Alex V Rowlands; Pontus Henriksson; Eric J Shiroma; Francisco M Acosta; Maria Rodriguez-Ayllon; Irene Esteban-Cornejo; Abel Plaza-Florido; Jose J Gil-Cosano; Ulf Ekelund; Vincent T van Hees; Francisco B Ortega
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Detecting accelerometer non-wear periods using change in acceleration combined with rate-of-change in temperature.

Authors:  Adam Vert; Kyle S Weber; Vanessa Thai; Erin Turner; Kit B Beyer; Benjamin F Cornish; F Elizabeth Godkin; Christopher Wong; William E McIlroy; Karen Van Ooteghem
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.612

2.  Putting Temperature into the Equation: Development and Validation of Algorithms to Distinguish Non-Wearing from Inactivity and Sleep in Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Sara Pagnamenta; Karoline Blix Grønvik; Kamiar Aminian; Beatrix Vereijken; Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  The seventh survey of the Tromsø Study (Tromsø7) 2015-2016: study design, data collection, attendance, and prevalence of risk factors and disease in a multipurpose population-based health survey.

Authors:  Laila A Hopstock; Sameline Grimsgaard; Heidi Johansen; Kristin Kanstad; Tom Wilsgaard; Anne Elise Eggen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.