Literature DB >> 24297837

Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges.

I-Min Lee1, Eric J Shiroma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current guidelines for aerobic activity require that adults carry out ≥150 min/week of moderate-intensity physical activity, with a large body of epidemiological evidence showing this level of activity to decrease the incidence of many chronic diseases. Less is known about whether light-intensity activities also have such benefits, and whether sedentary behaviour is an independent predictor of increased risks of these chronic diseases, as imprecise assessments of these behaviours and cross-sectional study designs have limited knowledge to date.
METHODS: Recent technological advances in assessment methods have made the use of movement sensors, such as the accelerometer, feasible for use in longitudinal, large-scale epidemiological studies. Several such studies are collecting sensor-assessed, objective measures of physical activity with the aim of relating these to the development of clinical endpoints. This is a relatively new area of research; thus, in this article, we use the Women's Health Study (WHS) as a case study to illustrate the challenges related to data collection, data processing and analyses of the vast amount of data collected.
RESULTS: The WHS plans to collect 7 days of accelerometer-assessed physical activity and sedentary behaviour in ~18 000 women aged ≥62 years. Several logistical challenges exist in collecting data; nonetheless, as of 31 August 2013, 11 590 women have already provided some data. In addition, the WHS experience on data reduction and data analyses can help inform other similar large-scale epidemiological studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Important data on the health effects of light-intensity activity and sedentary behaviour will emerge from large-scale epidemiological studies collecting objective assessments of these behaviours.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Physical Activity Measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24297837      PMCID: PMC3947179          DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  43 in total

1.  A systematic review of the evidence for Canada's Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults.

Authors:  Darren Er Warburton; Sarah Charlesworth; Adam Ivey; Lindsay Nettlefold; Shannon Sd Bredin
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 6.457

2.  Neural network versus activity-specific prediction equations for energy expenditure estimation in children.

Authors:  Nicole Ruch; Franziska Joss; Gerda Jimmy; Katarina Melzer; Johanna Hänggi; Urs Mäder
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2013-08-29

3.  Stressing harms of physical inactivity to promote exercise.

Authors:  Chi Pang Wen; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Simultaneous validation of ten physical activity questionnaires in older men: a doubly labeled water study.

Authors:  M Bonnefoy; S Normand; C Pachiaudi; J R Lacour; M Laville; T Kostka
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Television viewing time independently predicts all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: the EPIC Norfolk study.

Authors:  Katrien Wijndaele; Søren Brage; Hervé Besson; Kay-Tee Khaw; Stephen J Sharp; Robert Luben; Nicholas J Wareham; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Physical activity and television viewing in relation to risk of undiagnosed abnormal glucose metabolism in adults.

Authors:  David W Dunstan; Jo Salmon; Neville Owen; Timothy Armstrong; Paul Z Zimmet; Timothy A Welborn; Adrian J Cameron; Terence Dwyer; Damien Jolley; Jonathan E Shaw
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  A comprehensive evaluation of commonly used accelerometer energy expenditure and MET prediction equations.

Authors:  Kate Lyden; Sarah L Kozey; John W Staudenmeyer; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women.

Authors:  Paul M Ridker; Nancy R Cook; I-Min Lee; David Gordon; J Michael Gaziano; Joann E Manson; Charles H Hennekens; Julie E Buring
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer.

Authors:  Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy.

Authors:  I-Min Lee; Eric J Shiroma; Felipe Lobelo; Pekka Puska; Steven N Blair; Peter T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  127 in total

1.  Comparison of self-report and objective measures of physical activity in US adults with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Shao-Hsien Liu; Charles B Eaton; Jeffrey B Driban; Timothy E McAlindon; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental Exposure Assessment in Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Chirag J Patel; Jacqueline Kerr; Duncan C Thomas; Bhramar Mukherjee; Beate Ritz; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Marta Jankowska; Juliette Madan; Margaret R Karagas; Kimberly A McAllister; Leah E Mechanic; M Daniele Fallin; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Ian A Blair; Susan L Teitelbaum; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  GPS-Based Exposure to Greenness and Walkability and Accelerometry-Based Physical Activity.

Authors:  Peter James; Jaime E Hart; J Aaron Hipp; Jonathan A Mitchell; Jacqueline Kerr; Philip M Hurvitz; Karen Glanz; Francine Laden
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Accelerometer measured sedentary behavior and physical activity in white and black adults: The REGARDS study.

Authors:  Steven P Hooker; Brent Hutto; Wenfei Zhu; Steven N Blair; Natalie Colabianchi; John E Vena; David Rhodes; Virginia J Howard
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 5.  Health Benefits of Light-Intensity Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of Accelerometer Data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Authors:  Eszter Füzéki; Tobias Engeroff; Winfried Banzer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Use of Physical Activity Monitors in Rheumatic Populations.

Authors:  Christine A Pellegrini; Sara M Powell; Nicholas Mook; Katherine DeVivo; Linda Ehrlich-Jones
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Reproducibility of Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity and Sedentary Time.

Authors:  Sarah Kozey Keadle; Eric J Shiroma; Masamitsu Kamada; Charles E Matthews; Tamara B Harris; I-Min Lee
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Comparison of Accelerometry Methods for Estimating Physical Activity.

Authors:  Jacqueline Kerr; Catherine R Marinac; Katherine Ellis; Suneeta Godbole; Aaron Hipp; Karen Glanz; Jonathan Mitchell; Francine Laden; Peter James; David Berrigan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 9.  Need for Digital Biomarkers in Musculoskeletal Trials.

Authors:  Jörg Goldhahn
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2017-08-17

10.  Embedding Mobile Health Technology into the Nurses' Health Study 3 to Study Behavioral Risk Factors for Cancer.

Authors:  Ruby Fore; Jaime E Hart; Christine Choirat; Jennifer W Thompson; Kathleen Lynch; Francine Laden; Jorge E Chavarro; Peter James
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.