Literature DB >> 33893329

Augmenting ideational fluency in a creativity task across multiple transcranial direct current stimulation montages.

Evangelia G Chrysikou1, Hannah M Morrow2, Austin Flohrschutz3, Lauryn Denney4.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) research has revealed that generating novel ideas is associated with both reductions and increases in prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity, and engagement of posterior occipital cortex, among other regions. However, there is substantial variability in the robustness of these tDCS-induced effects due to heterogeneous sample sizes, different creativity measures, and methodological diversity in the application of tDCS across laboratories. To address these shortcomings, we used twelve different montages within a standardized tDCS protocol to investigate how altering activity in frontotemporal and occipital cortex impacts creative thinking. Across four experiments, 246 participants generated either the common or an uncommon use for 60 object pictures while undergoing tDCS. Participants also completed a control short-term memory task. We applied active tDCS for 20 min at 1.5 mA through two 5 cm × 5 cm electrodes over left or right ventrolateral prefrontal (areas F7, F8) or occipital (areas O1, O2) cortex, concurrent bilateral stimulation of these regions across polarities, or sham stimulation. Cathodal stimulation of the left, but not right, ventrolateral PFC improved fluency in creative idea generation, but had no effects on originality, as approximated by measures of semantic distance. No effects were obtained for the control tasks. Concurrent bilateral stimulation of the ventrolateral PFC regardless of polarity direction, and excitatory stimulation of occipital cortex did not alter task performance. Highlighting the importance of cross-experimental methodological consistency, these results extend our past findings and contribute to our understanding of the role of left PFC in creative thinking.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33893329     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85804-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  13 in total

Review 1.  The role of the lateral frontal cortex in mnemonic processing: the contribution of functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  A M Owen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The associative basis of the creative process.

Authors:  S A MEDNICK
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-05       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  A matched filter hypothesis for cognitive control.

Authors:  Evangelia G Chrysikou; Matthew J Weber; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jared Cooney Horvath; Jason D Forte; Olivia Carter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Jared Cooney Horvath; Jason D Forte; Olivia Carter
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  A Semantic Network Cartography of the Creative Mind.

Authors:  Yoed N Kenett; Miriam Faust
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Asif Jamil; Giorgi Batsikadze; Hsiao-I Kuo; Ludovica Labruna; Alkomiet Hasan; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Direct Current Stimulation Modulates LTP and LTD: Activity Dependence and Dendritic Effects.

Authors:  Greg Kronberg; Morgan Bridi; Ted Abel; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  Promoting Creativity Through Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). A Critical Review.

Authors:  Claudio Lucchiari; Paola Maria Sala; Maria Elide Vanutelli
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren't discussing (but probably should be).

Authors:  Jared C Horvath; Olivia Carter; Jason D Forte
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-24
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Bruce Luber; Anna-Katharine Brem; Marom Bikson; Andre R Brunoni; Roi Cohen Kadosh; Veljko Dubljević; Shirley Fecteau; Florinda Ferreri; Agnes Flöel; Mark Hallett; Roy H Hamilton; Christoph S Herrmann; Michal Lavidor; Collen Loo; Caroline Lustenberger; Sergio Machado; Carlo Miniussi; Vera Moliadze; Michael A Nitsche; Simone Rossi; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Margitta Seeck; Gregor Thut; Zsolt Turi; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Nicole Wenderoth; Anna Wexler; Ulf Ziemann; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2022-05-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.