Literature DB >> 33892022

Verification of field match lines in whole breast radiation therapy using Cherenkov imaging.

Rachael Hachadorian1, J Cedar Farwell2, Petr Bruza3, Michael Jermyn4, David J Gladstone5, Brian W Pogue6, Lesley A Jarvis7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In mono-isocentric radiation therapy treatment plans designed to treat the whole breast and supraclavicular lymph nodes, the fields meet at isocenter, forming the match line. Insufficient coverage at the match line can lead to recurrence, and overlap over weeks of treatment can lead to increased risk of healthy tissue toxicity. Cherenkov imaging was used to assess the accuracy of delivery at the match line and identify potential incidents during patient treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A controlled calibration was constructed from the deconvolved Cherenkov images from the delivery of a modified patient treatment plan to an anthropomorphic phantom with introduced separation and overlap. The trend from this calibration was then used to evaluate the field match line for accuracy and inter-fraction consistency for two patients.
RESULTS: The intersection point between matching field profiles was directly correlated to the distance (gap/overlap) between the fields (anthropomorphic phantom R2 = 0.994 "breath hold" and R2 = 0.990 "free breathing"). The profile intersection points from two patients' imaging sessions yielded an average of +1.40 mm offset (overlap) and -1.32 mm offset (gap), thereby introducing roughly a 25.0% over-dose and a -23.6% under-dose (R2 = 0.994).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that field match regions can be detected and quantified by taking deconvolved Cherenkov images and using their product image to create steep intensity gradients, causing match lines to stand out. These regions can then be quantitatively translated into a dose consequence. This approach offers a high sensitivity detection method which can quantify match line variability and errors in vivo.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; Cherenkov; Field Match; Imaging; In vivo; Radiation Therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33892022      PMCID: PMC8686843          DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.901


  16 in total

1.  Characteristics of photon beams from Philips SL25 linear accelerators.

Authors:  J R Palta; K Ayyangar; I Daftari; N Suntharalingam
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.

Authors:  Eric E Klein; Joseph Hanley; John Bayouth; Fang-Fang Yin; William Simon; Sean Dresser; Christopher Serago; Francisco Aguirre; Lijun Ma; Bijan Arjomandy; Chihray Liu; Carlos Sandin; Todd Holmes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218.

Authors:  Moyed Miften; Arthur Olch; Dimitris Mihailidis; Jean Moran; Todd Pawlicki; Andrea Molineu; Harold Li; Krishni Wijesooriya; Jie Shi; Ping Xia; Nikos Papanikolaou; Daniel A Low
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Technical Note: Time-gating to medical linear accelerator pulses: Stray radiation detector.

Authors:  Muhammad Ramish Ashraf; Petr Bruza; Venkat Krishnaswamy; David J Gladstone; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A dynamic supraclavicular field-matching technique for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with IMRT.

Authors:  Jun Duan; Sui Shen; Sharon A Spencer; Raef S Ahmed; Richard A Popple; Sung-Joon Ye; Ivan A Brezovich
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements.

Authors:  Paul A Jursinic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Method to plan, administer, and verify supine craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Jeff M Michalski; Eric E Klein; Russell Gerber
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Comparing the monoisocentric and dual isocentric techniques in chest wall radiotherapy of mastectomy patients.

Authors:  Amin Banaei; Bijan Hashemi; Mohsen Bakhshandeh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Imaging radiation dose in breast radiotherapy by X-ray CT calibration of Cherenkov light.

Authors:  R L Hachadorian; P Bruza; M Jermyn; D J Gladstone; B W Pogue; L A Jarvis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Initial Clinical Experience of Cherenkov Imaging in External Beam Radiation Therapy Identifies Opportunities to Improve Treatment Delivery.

Authors:  Lesley A Jarvis; Rachael L Hachadorian; Michael Jermyn; Petr Bruza; Daniel A Alexander; Irwin I Tendler; Benjamin B Williams; David J Gladstone; Philip E Schaner; Bassem I Zaki; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 8.013

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.