Stephen O'Neill1, Hannah Chimowitz2, Suzanne Leveille2,3, Jan Walker2. 1. BIDMC Social Work Department, Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA. 2. BIDMC Division of General Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA. 3. College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston , Boston , MA , USA.
Abstract
Background: Though patients' access to clinicians' visit notes may improve patient engagement and strengthen patient-clinician relationships, it is unknown whether these benefits extend to mental health settings. Aims: Examine patients' attitudes and experiences reading their psychotherapists' notes online. Methods: Using a mixed methods design, we conducted telephone interviews and an online survey of patients at an academic medical center who had opened ≥1 of their psychotherapy notes online. Eleven patients who had read ≥6 psychotherapy notes participated in semi-structured interviews, and 85 patients completed an online survey (response rate = 24%). Results: Nearly all survey respondents (94%) agreed that having open therapy notes is a good idea, and 87% wanted it to continue. More than half reported therapy notes were "very important" (≥7/10 on 0-10 scale) for feeling in control of their care, trusting their providers and taking care of themselves. Two respondents felt offended, and 7 (11%) felt judged by something they read in a note. Interview data supported survey findings. Conclusions: Our pilot findings indicate that most patients who read open therapy notes find them valuable for understanding and engaging in their mental health care, with minimal adverse effects. Larger studies with diverse patient populations are needed.
Background: Though patients' access to clinicians' visit notes may improve patient engagement and strengthen patient-clinician relationships, it is unknown whether these benefits extend to mental health settings. Aims: Examine patients' attitudes and experiences reading their psychotherapists' notes online. Methods: Using a mixed methods design, we conducted telephone interviews and an online survey of patients at an academic medical center who had opened ≥1 of their psychotherapy notes online. Eleven patients who had read ≥6 psychotherapy notes participated in semi-structured interviews, and 85 patients completed an online survey (response rate = 24%). Results: Nearly all survey respondents (94%) agreed that having open therapy notes is a good idea, and 87% wanted it to continue. More than half reported therapy notes were "very important" (≥7/10 on 0-10 scale) for feeling in control of their care, trusting their providers and taking care of themselves. Two respondents felt offended, and 7 (11%) felt judged by something they read in a note. Interview data supported survey findings. Conclusions: Our pilot findings indicate that most patients who read open therapy notes find them valuable for understanding and engaging in their mental health care, with minimal adverse effects. Larger studies with diverse patient populations are needed.
Authors: Carolyn L Turvey; Lindsey A Fuhrmeister; Dawn M Klein; Jane Moeckli; M Bryant Howren; Emily E Chasco Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Hannah Shucard; Emily Muller; Joslyn Johnson; Jan Walker; Joann G Elmore; Thomas H Payne; Jacob Berman; Sara L Jackson Journal: Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Date: 2022-02-17
Authors: Julian Schwarz; Annika Bärkås; Charlotte Blease; Lorna Collins; Maria Hägglund; Sarah Markham; Stefan Hochwarter Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2021-12-14
Authors: Julie A Wright; Suzanne G Leveille; Hannah Chimowitz; Alan Fossa; Rebecca Stametz; Deserae Clarke; Jan Walker Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Kevin Power; Zita McCrea; Maire White; Annette Breen; Brendan Dunleavy; Sean O'Donoghue; Tim Jacquemard; Veronica Lambert; Hany El-Naggar; Norman Delanty; Colin Doherty; Mary Fitzsimons Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 6.740