| Literature DB >> 33884564 |
Roberto Galea1, Federico De Marco2, Adel Aminian3, Nicolas Meneveau4, Frederic Anselme5, Christoph Gräni1, Adrian T Huber6, Emmanuel Teiger7, Xavier Iriart8, Marco Angelillis9, Nicolas Brugger1, Alessandro Spirito1, Noé Corpataux1, Anna Franzone10, Pascal Vranckx11,12, Urs Fischer13, Giovanni Pedrazzini14,15, Francesco Bedogni2, Stephan Windecker1, Lorenz Räber1, Marco Valgimigli16,17.
Abstract
Residual or newly acquired leaks are routinely appraised after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). The Watchman and the Amulet are the two most frequently used devices for LAAC but no randomized study has so far assessed their comparative leak rates after intervention. The "Comparison of Amplatzer Amulet vs Watchman devices in patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure" (Swiss-Apero, clinicaltrial.gov NCT03399851) is an academic-sponsored multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing Amulet versus Watchman/FLX devices among patients undergoing a clinically indicated LAAC. The study is designed to assess the superiority of Amulet vs. Watchman/FLX in terms of leaks detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) at 45 days (primary endpoint) and 13 months (secondary endpoint) after intervention by an imaging Core Laboratory. The Swiss-Apero study is the first randomized clinical trial comparing Amulet and Watchman/FLX with respect to the prevalence of post-procedural leak as assessed with CCTA.Entities:
Keywords: Amulet; Cardiac computed tomography angiography; Left atrial appendage closure; Randomized clinical trial; Watchman; Watchman FLX
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33884564 DOI: 10.1007/s12265-020-10095-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res ISSN: 1937-5387 Impact factor: 4.132