| Literature DB >> 33883568 |
Lingyun Liu1,2, Hua Chen3,4, Jing Yuan5, Yixiang Wang3,4, Boqi Weng3,4, Penghu Liu6, Guoxue Li7.
Abstract
In this study, 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 8 mg·kg-1 of cadmium were added to the cultivation materials. In order to study the effects of different concentrations of Cd stress on J1 and J77, the contents of antioxidant enzymes, proline and malondialdehyde, Cd content, agronomic traits and yield of fruiting bodies of Agaricus brasiliensis were determined, and the nutritional components such as polysaccharide, triterpene, protein, total sugar and total amino acid were determined. The results showed that the physiological indexes of strain J1 and J77 changed regularly under different concentrations of Cd stress. J1 was a high absorption and low tolerance variety, while J77 was a low absorption and high tolerance variety. Low concentration of Cd promoted the growth of strain J1, and higher concentration of Cd promoted the growth of strain J77. The contents of protein and total amino acids in the two strains changed greatly, followed by polysaccharides, which indicated that Cd stress had the greatest impact on the three nutrients, and other nutrients were not sensitive to Cd stress.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33883568 PMCID: PMC8060259 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87349-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Effects of different concentrations of cadmium stress on the agronomic characters of J1.
| Treatment | J1 (CK0) | J1 (0.5) | J1 (1.0) | J1 (1.5) | J1 (2.0) | J1 (4.0) | J1 (6.0) | J1 (8.0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average weight (g) | 15.67 ± 0.17a | 15.09 ± 0.23b | 13.98 ± 0.04c | 12.98 ± 0.10d | 12.57 ± 0.27de | 13.77 ± 0.38c | 12.40 ± 0.08e | 11.07 ± 0.21f |
| Number | 16 ± 0.94de | 21 ± 1.25c | 35 ± 1.70b | 15 ± 0.82e | 22 ± 0.94c | 40 ± 1.70a | 21 ± 0.47c | 7 ± 0.47f |
| Strain height (cm) | 7.94 ± 0.04a | 7.83 ± 0.21ab | 7.09 ± 0.39bc | 7.13 ± 0.38bc | 7.78 ± 0.22ab | 7.74 ± 0.34ab | 6.69 ± 0.20c | 7.57 ± 0.52ab |
| Cap diameter (cm) | 3.56 ± 0.11ab | 3.83 ± 0.17a | 3.35 ± 0.11bc | 3.55 ± 0.18ab | 3.44 ± 0.10b | 3.31 ± 0.08bc | 3.46 ± 0.28b | 3.03 ± 0.05c |
| Stipe diameter (cm) | 1.47 ± 0.07a | 1.40 ± 0.08ab | 1.42 ± 0.10ab | 1.23 ± 0.06c | 1.31 ± 0.07ab | 1.33 ± 0.08ab | 1.36 ± 0.18ab | 1.20 ± 0.08c |
| Stipe length (cm) | 6.62 ± 0.07a | 6.27 ± 0.45a | 5.88 ± 0.51a | 6.00 ± 0.41a | 6.46 ± 0.52a | 6.75 ± 0.29a | 5.91 ± 0.23a | 6.57 ± 0.33a |
| Cap thickness (cm) | 2.51 ± 0.04a | 3.07 ± 0.45a | 2.47 ± 0.28a | 3.28 ± 1.08a | 2.49 ± 0.07a | 2.55 ± 0.10a | 2.48 ± 0.19a | 2.30 ± 0.22a |
| Cap weight (g) | 8.70 ± 0.20a | 7.72 ± 0.25ab | 7.32 ± 0.53b | 8.13 ± 0.24ab | 7.37 ± 0.19b | 7.88 ± 0.38ab | 7.50 ± 0.88b | 6.13 ± 0.34c |
| Stipe weight (g) | 7.06 ± 0.04a | 7.36 ± 0.45a | 6.68 ± 0.49ab | 4.85 ± 0.32c | 5.18 ± 0.18c | 5.89 ± 0.05bc | 4.90 ± 0.96c | 4.93 ± 0.42c |
Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Effects of different concentrations of cadmium stress on the agronomic characters of J77.
| Treatment | J77 (CK) | J77 (0.5) | J77 (1.0) | J77 (1.5) | J77 (2.0) | J77 (4.0) | J77 (6.0) | J77 (8.0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average weight (g) | 13.91 ± 0.85b | 17.39 ± 0.85a | 17.95 ± 0.52a | 14.54 ± 1.43b | 14.48 ± 0.35b | 14.27 ± 1.51b | 17.00 ± 1.64a | 13.80 ± 0.51b |
| Number | 32 ± 2.05c | 28 ± 2.94cd | 38 ± 3.09b | 24 ± 1.41de | 28 ± 3.27cd | 20 ± 1.63e | 33 ± 2.16bc | 72 ± 2.62a |
| Strain height (cm) | 6.13 ± 0.43a | 5.19 ± 0.70a | 5.28 ± 0.35a | 5.41 ± 0.39a | 5.69 ± 0.44a | 5.57 ± 0.56a | 5.44 ± 0.41a | 5.39 ± 0.42a |
| Cap diameter (cm) | 3.80 ± 0.16abc | 4.06 ± 0.19a | 4.00 ± 0.01ab | 3.67 ± 0.10bc | 3.71 ± 0.06abc | 3.79 ± 0.14abc | 3.82 ± 0.16abc | 3.63 ± 0.22c |
| Stipe diameter (cm) | 1.35 ± 0.04e | 2.37 ± 0.20a | 2.38 ± 0.24a | 1.86 ± 0.07bcd | 1.61 ± 0.17de | 1.70 ± 0.13cd | 2.07 ± 0.04ab | 2.03 ± 0.22abc |
| Stipe length (cm) | 5.34 ± 0.36a | 4.44 ± 0.49a | 4.61 ± 0.36a | 4.54 ± 0.35a | 4.98 ± 0.44a | 4.71 ± 0.47a | 4.68 ± 0.32a | 4.61 ± 0.44a |
| Cap thickness (cm) | 2.02 ± 0.11a | 1.86 ± 0.15ab | 1.79 ± 0.02b | 1.87 ± 0.02ab | 1.91 ± 0.07ab | 1.85 ± 0.13ab | 1.87 ± 0.11ab | 1.80 ± 0.04ab |
| Cap weight (g) | 8.99 ± 0.72bc | 10.66 ± 1.24ab | 10.92 ± 0.33a | 8.87 ± 0.98bc | 9.18 ± 0.21abc | 9.29 ± 0.86abc | 10.48 ± 0.98ab | 8.10 ± 0.66c |
| Stipe weight (g) | 4.88 ± 0.21c | 6.70 ± 0.38a | 7.02 ± 0.20a | 5.67 ± 0.57bc | 5.25 ± 0.21c | 4.98 ± 0.65c | 6.52 ± 0.66ab | 5.70 ± 0.20bc |
Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 1(A) The shape of J1’s fruiting body; (B) The shape of J77’s fruiting body; (C) The form of J1’s fruiting body during cultivation; (D) The form of J77’s fruiting body during cultivation.
Figure 2Effects of Cd stress on yield and Cd content in fruiting bodies.
Figure 3Effect of Cd stress on antioxidant enzyme activities.
Figure 4Effect of Cd stress on PRO and MDA content in fruiting bodies.
Figure 5Effects of cadmium stress on nutrients in fruiting bodies A, B, C, D, E and F represent the protein, carbon, polysaccharide, triterpene, total amino acid and total sugar content in fruiting bodies of J1 and J77 under different concentrations of Cd stress, respectively.