Literature DB >> 33871660

Influence of visual feedback, hand dominance and sex on individuated finger movements.

Anna-Maria Johansson1,2, Helena Grip3,4, Louise Rönnqvist5, Jonas Selling3, Carl-Johan Boraxbekk4,6,7, Andrew Strong3, Charlotte K Häger3.   

Abstract

The ability to perform individual finger movements, highly important in daily activities, involves visual monitoring and proprioception. We investigated the influence of vision on the spatial and temporal control of independent finger movements, for the dominant and non-dominant hand and in relation to sex. Twenty-six healthy middle-aged to old adults (M age = 61 years; range 46-79 years; females n = 13) participated. Participants performed cyclic flexion-extension movements at the metacarpophalangeal joint of one finger at a time while keeping the other fingers as still as possible. Movements were recorded using 3D optoelectronic motion technique (120 Hz). The movement trajectory distance; speed peaks (movement smoothness); Individuation Index (II; the degree a finger can move in isolation from the other fingers) and Stationarity Index (SI; how still a finger remains while the other fingers move) were extracted. The main findings were: (1) vision only improved the II and SI marginally; (2) longer trajectories were evident in the no-vision condition for the fingers of the dominant hand in the female group; (3) longer trajectories were specifically evident for the middle and ring fingers within the female group; (4) females had marginally higher II and SI compared with males; and (5) females had fewer speed peaks than males, particularly for the ring finger. Our results suggest that visual monitoring of finger movements marginally improves performance of our non-manipulative finger movement task. A consistent finding was that females showed greater independent finger control compared with males.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finger movements; Kinematics; Motor control; Sex differences; Spatiotemporal; Vision

Year:  2021        PMID: 33871660     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06100-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension.

Authors:  A Churchill; B Hopkins; L Rönnqvist; S Vogt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Finger somatotopy in human motor cortex.

Authors:  R Beisteiner; C Windischberger; R Lanzenberger; V Edward; R Cunnington; M Erdler; A Gartus; B Streibl; E Moser; L Deecke
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Functional somatotopy of finger representations in human primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Peter Dechent; Jens Frahm
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The timing of natural prehension movements.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Hand shaping using hapsis resembles visually guided hand shaping.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Handedness and index finger movements performed on a small touchscreen.

Authors:  Tomoko Aoki; Gil Rivlis; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Control of the dominant and nondominant hand: exploitation and taming of nonmuscular forces.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects.

Authors:  P Fourneret; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Human muscle spindles act as forward sensory models.

Authors:  Michael Dimitriou; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.