Literature DB >> 20850322

Human muscle spindles act as forward sensory models.

Michael Dimitriou1, Benoni B Edin.   

Abstract

Modern theories of motor control incorporate forward models that combine sensory information and motor commands to predict future sensory states. Such models circumvent unavoidable neural delays associated with on-line feedback control. Here we show that signals in human muscle spindle afferents during unconstrained wrist and finger movements predict future kinematic states of their parent muscle. Specifically, we show that the discharges of type Ia afferents are best correlated with the velocity of length changes in their parent muscles approximately 100-160 ms in the future and that their discharges vary depending on motor sequences in a way that cannot be explained by the state of their parent muscle alone. We therefore conclude that muscle spindles can act as "forward sensory models": they are affected both by the current state of their parent muscle and by efferent (fusimotor) control, and their discharges represent future kinematic states. If this conjecture is correct, then sensorimotor learning implies learning how to control not only the skeletal muscles but also the fusimotor system.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20850322     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  27 in total

1.  Ankle joint movements are encoded by both cutaneous and muscle afferents in humans.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Jean-Pierre Roll; Valérie Hospod; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reckoning the moment of reckoning in spontaneous voluntary movement.

Authors:  Sebo Uithol; Aaron Schurger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The temporal evolution of feedback gains rapidly update to task demands.

Authors:  Michael Dimitriou; Daniel M Wolpert; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership.

Authors:  Lee D Walsh; G Lorimer Moseley; Janet L Taylor; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Effectiveness of electrical noise in reducing postural sway: a comparison between imperceptible stimulation applied to the anterior and to the posterior leg muscles.

Authors:  Fernando Henrique Magalhães; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Sensory control of normal movement and of movement aided by neural prostheses.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Effects of visual feedback absence on force control during isometric contraction.

Authors:  Eloisa Limonta; Susanna Rampichini; Emiliano Cè; Fabio Esposito
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Multisensory components of rapid motor responses to fingertip loading.

Authors:  F Crevecoeur; A Barrea; X Libouton; J-L Thonnard; P Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Neurophysiology and neural engineering: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Emergence of gamma motor activity in an artificial neural network model of the corticospinal system.

Authors:  Bernard Grandjean; Marc A Maier
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 1.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.