| Literature DB >> 33870444 |
Maria Giulia Bacalini1, Anna Reale2, Marco Malavolta3, Fabio Ciccarone4, María Moreno-Villanueva5,6, Martijn E T Dollé7, Eugène Jansen7, Tilman Grune8,9, Efstathios S Gonos10, Christiane Schön11, Jürgen Bernhardt11, Beatrix Grubeck-Loebenstein12, Ewa Sikora13, Olivier Toussaint14, Florence Debacq-Chainiaux14, Miriam Capri15, Antti Hervonen16, Mikko Hurme16, P Eline Slagboom17, Nicolle Breusing18, Valentina Aversano2, Stefano Tagliatesta2, Claudio Franceschi19, Maria A Blasco20, Alexander Bürkle5, Paola Caiafa21, Michele Zampieri22.
Abstract
Ageing leaves characteristic traces in the DNA methylation make-up of the genome. However, the importance of DNA methylation in ageing remains unclear. The study of subtelomeric regions could give promising insights into this issue. Previously reported associations between susceptibility to age-related diseases and epigenetic instability at subtelomeres suggest that the DNA methylation profile of subtelomeres undergoes remodelling during ageing. In the present work, this hypothesis has been tested in the context of the European large-scale project MARK-AGE. In this cross-sectional study, we profiled the DNA methylation of chromosomes 5 and 21 subtelomeres, in more than 2000 age-stratified women and men recruited in eight European countries. The study included individuals from the general population as well as the offspring of nonagenarians and Down syndrome subjects, who served as putative models of delayed and accelerated ageing, respectively. Significant linear changes of subtelomeric DNA methylation with increasing age were detected in the general population, indicating that subtelomeric DNA methylation changes are typical signs of ageing. Data also show that, compared to the general population, the dynamics of age-related DNA methylation changes are attenuated in the offspring of centenarian, while they accelerate in Down syndrome individuals. This result suggests that subtelomeric DNA methylation changes reflect the rate of ageing progression. We next attempted to trace the age-related changes of subtelomeric methylation back to the influence of diverse variables associated with methylation variations in the population, including demographics, dietary/health habits and clinical parameters. Results indicate that the effects of age on subtelomeric DNA methylation are mostly independent of all other variables evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: Ageing; Centenarian offspring; DNA methylation; Down syndrome; Epigenetics; Subtelomere
Year: 2021 PMID: 33870444 PMCID: PMC8190237 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-021-00347-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Geroscience ISSN: 2509-2723 Impact factor: 7.713
Study population
| Subject group | RASIG | GO | SGO | DS | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age group | All | 35 | 45 | 55 | 65 | All | 55 | 65 | All | 55 | 65 | ||||
| Age range (years) | 35–75 | 35–44 | 45–54 | 55–64 | 65–75 | 55–75 | 55–64 | 65–75 | 55–75 | 55–64 | 65–75 | 19–68 | |||
| 2308 | 494 | 576 | 628 | 610 | 512 | 253 | 259 | 283 | 155 | 128 | 52 | ||||
| Age (year) | 55.9 ± 113 | 40.0 ± 2.8 | 50.1 ± 2.8 | 60.2 ± 2.9 | 69.9 ± 3.1 | 64.7 ± 4.8 | 60.6 ± 2.7 | 68.7 ± 2.6 | 64.2 ± 4.6 | 60.8 ± 2.5 | 68.6 ± 2.6 | 40.2 ± 12.2 | |||
| Male % ( | 48.5 (1119) | 47.9 (237) | 47.4 (273) | 49.5 (311) | 48.8 (298) | 0.89 | 42.6 (218) | 43.9 (111) | 41.3 (107) | 0.558 | 51.9 (147) | 39.3 (61) | 67.2 (86) | 53.84 (28) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.2 ± 4.5 | 25.1 ± 4.6 | 25.6 ± 4.1 | 26.8 ± 4.7 | 27.1 ± 4.3 | 26.6 ± 4.3 | 26.6 ± 4.4 | 26.6 ± 4.2 | 0.165 | 27.4 ± 4.4 | 27.3 ± 4.5 | 27.6 ± 4.2 | 0.642 | ||
| ˂ 25 | 44.8 (1032) | 57.3 (283) | 50.2 (289) | 40.7 (255) | 33.8 (205) | 22.7 ± 1.7 | 22.4 ± 1.9 | 22.9 ± 1.4 | 22.7 ± 1.5 | 22.6 ± 1.4 | 22.8 ± 1.6 | ||||
| 25 to ˂ 30 | 37.9 (872) | 30.4 (150) | 35.9 (207) | 38.2 (239) | 45.5 (276) | 27.0 ± 1.3 | 27.0 ± 1.4 | 27.1 ± 1.2 | 27.2 ± 1.3 | 27.1 ± 1.3 | 27.2 ± 1.3 | ||||
| ≥ 30 | 17.3 (399) | 12.3 (61) | 13.9 (80) | 21.1 (132) | 20.8 (126) | 32.9 ± 3.6 | 32.7 ± 3.5 | 33.1 ± 3.7 | 33.7 ± 2.9 | 33.8 ± 3.0 | 33.4 ± 2.8 | ||||
| Austria | 17.3 (399) | 20.0 (99) | 17.4 (100) | 16.4 (103) | 15.9 (97) | 0.092 | |||||||||
| Belgium | 11.4 (262) | 6.5 (32) | 12.0 (69) | 12.7 (80) | 13.3 (81) | 15.4 (79) | 17.8 (45) | 13.1 (34) | 12.0 (34) | 12.3 (19) | 11.7 (15) | ||||
| Finland | 4.0 (93) | 1.8 (9) | 2.1 (12) | 5.6 (35) | 6.1 (37) | 26.2 (134) | 24.1 (61) | 28.2 (73) | 18.4 (52) | 18.1 (28) | 18.7 (24) | ||||
| Germany | 15.5 (358) | 12.8 (63) | 16.8 (97) | 15.8 (99) | 16.2 (99) | ||||||||||
| Greece | 17.0 (392) | 19.2 (95) | 18.6 (107) | 15.6 (98) | 15.1 (92) | 3.5 (18) | 4.7 (12) | 2.3 (6) | 1.8 (5) | 0.6 (1) | 3.1 (4) | ||||
| Italy | 17.2 (398) | 19.8 (98) | 17.2 (99) | 15.9 (100) | 16.6 (101) | 18.4 (94) | 17.4 (44) | 19.3 (50) | 19.4 (55) | 23.9 (37) | 14.1 (18) | 100 (52) | |||
| Poland | 17.6 (406) | 19.8 (98) | 16.0 (92) | 18.0 (113) | 16.9 (103) | 13.7 (70) | 16.2 (41) | 11.2 (29) | 14.8 (42) | 18.7 (29) | 10.2 (13) | ||||
| The Netherlands | 22.9 (117) | 19.8 (50) | 25.9 (67) | 33.6 (95) | 26.4 (41) | 42.2 (54) | |||||||||
Values are mean ± SD for continuous variables and percentage (number) for categorical variables
p value: one-way ANOVA (continuous variables) and chi-square test (prevalence, for categorical variables). Bold text indicates a statistically significant difference ( p value < 0.05). Definition of abbreviations is provided in the supplementary list
Fig. 1CpG distribution of the 5p and 21q subtelomeric regions. Schematic representation of CpG site distribution within the analysed regions. Green and red circles represent the analysed and non-analysed CpG sites, respectively. The dashed boxes indicate the CpG sites that were measured as single methylation units in the EpiTYPER assay. The genomic positions refer to the 2009 (GRCh37/hg19) assembly
Fig. 2DNA methylation level of the 5p and 21q subtelomeres in RASIG stratified by age. a Methylation percentage of the CpG sites in the 5p subtelomeric region. b Methylation percentage of the CpG sites in the 21q subtelomeric region. c Mean methylation percentage calculated from all the CpG sites of the 5p and 21q subtelomeres. Data are depicted by box-and-whisker plots. The horizontal line indicates the median. The lower and the upper edge of the box show the first and the third quartile, respectively. The whiskers show the maximum and the minimum data values. Pairwise comparisons resulting in a significant Kruskal–Wallis test are indicated by the asterisks. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 3Correlation between the DNA methylation level of the 5p and 21q subtelomeres and age in RASIG. a CpG methylation percentage and average methylation percentage of the 5p subtelomere. b CpG methylation percentage and average methylation percentage of the 21q subtelomere. Data are depicted by scatterplots, including the line of best fit
GLM analysis of the methylation age of subtelomeres (MAST) by age in RASIG
| Variables | Type III | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wald chi-square | df | Sig. | |
| Age group | 134.080 | 3 | |
| Sex | 2.181 | 1 | 0.140 |
| Recruitment centre | 3.773 | 1 | 0.052 |
Model: MAST (s), response variable; age group (o), factor variable; sex (n) and recruitment centre (n) were included as covariates (o, ordinal variable; n, nominal variable; s, scale variable). Type III, type III sum of squares. Bold text indicates a statistically significant p value
Fig. 4Level of MAST in RASIG stratified by age. Data are represented by mean ± S.D. Pairwise comparisons resulting in a significant GLM analysis, followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, are indicated by the asterisks. The GLM was adjusted for sex and recruitment centre. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 5Level of MAST in GO vs SGO and RASIG stratified by age. Data are represented by mean ± S.D. Pairwise comparisons resulting in a significant GLM analysis, followed by least significant difference (and Bonferroni) post hoc tests, are indicated by the asterisks. The GLM was adjusted for sex and recruitment centre. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
GLM analysis of MAST in GO vs SGO and RASIG in the population aged >54 years controlling for sex and recruitment centre
| Variables | Type III | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wald chi-square | df | Sig. | |
| Subject group (GO, SGO, RASIG) | 8.943 | 2 | |
| Age group | 15.199 | 1 | |
| Sex | 0.658 | 1 | 0.417 |
| Recruitment centre | 0.524 | 1 | 0.469 |
Model: MAST (s), response variable; subject group (n), factor variable; age group (o), sex (n) and recruitment centre (n) were included as covariates (o, ordinal variable; n, nominal variable; s, scale variable). Type III, type III sum of squares. Bold text indicate a statistically significant p value
Fig. 6Level of MAST in DS vs RASIG stratified by age. Data are represented by mean ± S.D. Pairwise comparisons resulting in a significant GLM analysis, followed by least significant difference (and Bonferroni) post hoc tests, are indicated by the asterisks. The GLM was adjusted for sex and recruitment centre. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
GLM analysis of MAST in DS vs RASIG in the age range of 35–55 years
| Variables | Type III | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wald chi-square | df | Sig. | |
| Subject group (DS, RASIG) | 8.334 | 1 | |
| Age group | 9.421 | 1 | |
| Sex | 4.416 | 1 | |
Model: MAST (s), response variable; subject group (n), factor variable; age group (o) and sex (n) were included as covariates (o, ordinal variable; n, nominal variable; s, scale variable). Type III, type III sum of squares. Bold text indicated a statistically significant p value
Contribution of selected variables and covariates on age-related changes of MAST in RASIG
| Source | Type III | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wald chi-square | df | Sig. | |
| Age group | 72.680 | 3 | |
| Recruitment centre | 2.635 | 1 | 0.105 |
| Sex | 0.935 | 1 | 0.334 |
| White bread consumption | 0.032 | 1 | 0.858 |
| Alcohol consumption | 4.011 | 1 | |
| Triglycerides | 1.825 | 1 | 0.177 |
| LDL cholesterol | 1.850 | 1 | 0.174 |
| Lymphocytes | 0.201 | 1 | 0.654 |
| Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio | 1.779 | 1 | 0.182 |
| Neutrophils | 0.552 | 1 | 0.45 |
| Fibrinogen | 3.604 | 1 | 0.058 |
| Relative DNMT1 expression | 4.578 | 1 | |
Model: MAST (s), response variable; age group (o), factor variable; sex (n), recruitment centre (n), white bread consumption (s), alcohol consumption (s), triglycerides (s), LDL cholesterol (s), lymphocytes (s), ratio of lymphocyte to monocyte (s), neutrophils (s), fibrinogen (s) and DNMT1 expression (s) were included as covariates (o, ordinal variable; n, nominal variable; s, scale variable). Type III, type III sum of squares. Bold text indicates a statistically significant p value
Contribution of selected variables and covariates on group-related (GO, SGO and RASIG) changes of MAST in individuals aged >54 years
| Source | Type III | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wald chi-square | df | Sig. | |
| Subject group (GO, SGO, RASIG) | 8.485 | 2 | |
| Age | 12.077 | 1 | |
| Recruitment centre | 0.153 | 1 | 0.695 |
| Sex | 0.518 | 1 | 0.472 |
| Alcohol consumption | 1.345 | 1 | 0.246 |
| White bread consumption | 0.013 | 1 | 0.909 |
| Triglycerides | 0.019 | 1 | 0.890 |
| LDL cholesterol | 0.962 | 1 | 0.327 |
| Fibrinogen | 2.584 | 1 | 0.108 |
| Lymphocytes | 0.344 | 1 | 0.557 |
| Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio | 4.671 | 1 | |
| Neutrophils | 0.358 | 1 | 0.550 |
| Relative DNMT1 expression | 4.369 | 1 | |
Model: MAST (s), response variable; subject group (o), factor variable; age (s), sex (n), recruitment centre (n), white bread consumption (s), alcohol consumption (s), triglycerides (s), LDL cholesterol (s), lymphocytes (s), ratio of lymphocyte to monocyte (s), neutrophils (s), fibrinogen (s) and DNMT1 expression (s) were included as covariates (o, ordinal variable; n, nominal variable; s, scale variable). Type III, type III sum of squares