Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatic Lesion Characterization/Diagnosis.

Literature DB >> 33868658

Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatic Lesion Characterization/Diagnosis.

Khaled Y Elbanna¹, Ania Z Kielar^1,2.

Abstract

Year: 2021 PMID： 33868658 PMCID： PMC8043714 DOI： 10.1002/cld.1089

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) ISSN： 2046-2484

Keyword Cloud
References

× No keyword cloud information.

23 in total

1. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: MR correlation with surgical and histological findings.

Authors: E Chryssou; J A Guthrie; J Ward; P J Robinson
Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2010-07-31 Impact factor: 2.350

2. Hepatocellular adenomas: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and liver biopsy in subtype classification.

Authors: Maxime Ronot; Stephane Bahrami; Julien Calderaro; Dominique-Charles Valla; Pierre Bedossa; Jacques Belghiti; Jacques Belghti; Valérie Vilgrain; Valérie Paradis
Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 17.425

Review 3. Liver masses: a clinical, radiologic, and pathologic perspective.

Authors: Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Vishal Chandan; Lewis R Roberts
Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 11.382

4. Cystic focal liver lesions in the adult: differential CT and MR imaging features.

Authors: K J Mortelé; P R Ros
Journal: Radiographics Date: 2001 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.333

Review 5. Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatocellular Adenoma: Accuracy of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging--A Systematic Review.

Authors: Matthew D F McInnes; Rebecca M Hibbert; João R Inácio; Nicola Schieda
Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 11.105

6. Detection of liver metastases from endocrine tumors: a prospective comparison of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors: Clarisse Dromain; Thierry de Baere; Jean Lumbroso; Hubert Caillet; Agnès Laplanche; Valerie Boige; Michel Ducreux; Pierre Duvillard; Dominique Elias; Martin Schlumberger; Robert Sigal; Eric Baudin
Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544

Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatic Lesion Characterization/Diagnosis.

1. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: MR correlation with surgical and histological findings.

2. Hepatocellular adenomas: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and liver biopsy in subtype classification.

Review 3. Liver masses: a clinical, radiologic, and pathologic perspective.

4. Cystic focal liver lesions in the adult: differential CT and MR imaging features.

Review 5. Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatocellular Adenoma: Accuracy of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging--A Systematic Review.

6. Detection of liver metastases from endocrine tumors: a prospective comparison of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Review 7. Liver lesion detection and characterization: role of diffusion-weighted imaging.

Review 8. Colorectal liver metastases: Radiological diagnosis and staging.

9. Hepatocellular adenomas: magnetic resonance imaging features as a function of molecular pathological classification.

Review 10. Imaging Diagnosis of Intrahepatic and Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Recent Advances and Challenges.