Literature DB >> 21480324

Hepatocellular adenomas: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and liver biopsy in subtype classification.

Maxime Ronot1, Stephane Bahrami, Julien Calderaro, Dominique-Charles Valla, Pierre Bedossa, Jacques Belghiti, Jacques Belghti, Valérie Vilgrain, Valérie Paradis.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are divided into genotype/phenotype subgroups associated with different evolutive profiles. Therefore, recognition of subtype is of clinical importance in patient management. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the most informative imaging modality and liver biopsy a key diagnostic tool whose role in HCA subtyping has never been extensively studied. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI and liver biopsy with and without immunohistochemistry and to assess the interobserver agreement for MR classification in a consecutive series of resected HCAs. Forty-seven HCAs with preoperative MRI and biopsy were retrospectively included. MRI data were reviewed independently by two abdominal radiologists blind to the pathological results and classification. Subtyping of HCAs on liver biopsy was made blindly to clinical, biological, and imaging data and to final classification. Routine histological analysis was based on morphological criteria and immunohistochemistry was systematically performed when enough tissue was available. Final subtyping of HCA was based on the examination of the surgical specimen. Radiologists correctly classified HCAs in 85%. The interobserver kappa correlation coefficient was 0.86. Routine histological analysis led to 76.6% of correct classification and 81.6% when immunophenotypical characteristics were available. The additional value of immunophenotypical markers is best in HCAs containing steatosis. Agreement between MRI findings and routine histological analysis was observed in 74.5%, leading to a likelihood ratio of subtype diagnosis higher than 20.
CONCLUSION: MRI and biopsy analysis are two efficient methods in subtyping HCAs and their association increases the diagnosis confidence. Interobserver variability in MRI criteria is very low. 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21480324     DOI: 10.1002/hep.24147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  45 in total

1.  Iso- or hyperintensity of hepatocellular adenomas on hepatobiliary phase does not always correspond to hepatospecific contrast-agent uptake: importance for tumor subtyping.

Authors:  Edouard Reizine; Maxime Ronot; Frederic Pigneur; Yvonne Purcell; Sebastien Mulé; Marco Dioguardi Burgio; Julien Calderaro; Giuliana Amaddeo; Alexis Laurent; Valérie Vilgrain; Alain Luciani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI for differentiation of FNH and HCA: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Christian Grieser; Ingo G Steffen; Incken-Birthe Kramme; Hendrik Bläker; Ergin Kilic; Carmen Maria Perez Fernandez; Daniel Seehofer; Eckart Schott; Bernd Hamm; Timm Denecke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Open and laparoscopic resection of hepatocellular adenoma: trends over 23 years at a specialist hepatobiliary unit.

Authors:  Nicola de'Angelis; Riccardo Memeo; Julien Calderaro; Emanuele Felli; Chady Salloum; Philippe Compagnon; Alain Luciani; Alexis Laurent; Daniel Cherqui; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Findings of a Giant Inflammatory Hepatocellular Adenoma: a Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Marco Di Pietropaolo; Chiara Briani; Emanuela Pilozzi; Francesco Carbonetti; Vincenzo David; Elsa Iannicelli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2015-12

Review 5.  Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatic Lesion Characterization/Diagnosis.

Authors:  Khaled Y Elbanna; Ania Z Kielar
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-04-13

Review 6.  Lessons learnt from pathologic imaging correlation in the liver: an historical perspective.

Authors:  Yvonne Purcell; Pauline Copin; Valérie Paradis; Valérie Vilgrain; Maxime Ronot
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Hepatocellular adenoma management: advances but still a long way to go.

Authors:  Jean Frédéric Blanc; Nora Frulio; Laurence Chiche; Paulette Bioulac-Sage; Charles Balabaud
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-05-15

Review 8.  Differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from its various mimickers in liver magnetic resonance imaging: What are the tips when using hepatocyte-specific agents?

Authors:  Yang Shin Park; Chang Hee Lee; Jeong Woo Kim; Sora Shin; Cheol Min Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Long-term follow-up of hepatic adenoma and adenomatosis: analysis of size change on imaging with histopathological correlation.

Authors:  N Shao; A Pandey; M A Ghasabeh; P Khoshpouri; P Pandey; F N Varzaneh; M Zarghampour; D Fouladi; T M Pawlik; R A Anders; I R Kamel
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  MR findings of steatotic focal nodular hyperplasia and comparison with other fatty tumours.

Authors:  Maxime Ronot; Valérie Paradis; Rafael Duran; Anne Kerbaol; Marie-Pierre Vullierme; Jacques Belghiti; Dominique-Charles Valla; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.