Literature DB >> 20797463

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: MR correlation with surgical and histological findings.

E Chryssou1, J A Guthrie, J Ward, P J Robinson.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) with high-resolution dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in determining the imaging features of hilar cholangiocarcinoma that relate to tumour extent and influence resectability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients that underwent resection were reviewed. Tumour location and extent, lobar atrophy, the degree of portal vein and hepatic artery involvement were recorded. The findings were correlated with surgical and histopathological findings.
RESULTS: Biliary assessment was concordant in 14 and discordant in eight of 14 stented and four of 12 non-stented patients. In 63/82 veins and 43/74 arteries results were fully concordant. The mean sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) in predicting involvement of the main portal vein (MPV) at surgery were 83.3, 100, 100, and 92.5%; of the left main branch of the portal vein (LPV) were 100, 91.6, 93.3, and 100%; and of the right branch of the portal vein (RPV) were 87.5, 100, 100, and 87.5%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MRI in determining histological involvement of the MPV was 75, 90.9, 60, and 92.5%; 100, 73.3, 73, and 100% for the LPV, and 100, 66.6, 42.8, and 100% for the RPV, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRC with high-resolution dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MRI is effective in determining tumour extent and vascular involvement, but prior stenting may lead to overestimation. Copyright (c) 2010 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20797463     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  9 in total

Review 1.  Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatic Lesion Characterization/Diagnosis.

Authors:  Khaled Y Elbanna; Ania Z Kielar
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-04-13

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance evaluations of biliary malignancy and condition at high-risk for biliary malignancy: Current status.

Authors:  Reiji Sugita
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2013-12-27

3.  Radiological diagnosis and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Carlos Valls; Sandra Ruiz; Laura Martinez; David Leiva
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-07-15

Review 4.  An update on liver surgery for cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Karim Boudjema; Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Eveline Boucher; Tanguy Rohou; Michel Rayar; Laurent Sulpice
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-10-02

Review 5.  Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: diagnosis, treatment options, and management.

Authors:  Kevin C Soares; Ihab Kamel; David P Cosgrove; Joseph M Herman; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.293

6.  Role of resection for Bismuth type IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma and analysis of determining factors for curative resection.

Authors:  In Woong Han; Jin-Young Jang; Mee Joo Kang; Wooil Kwon; Jae Woo Park; Ye Rim Chang; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Cholangiocarcinoma: spectrum of appearances on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging and the effect of biliary function on signal intensity.

Authors:  Shi-Ting Feng; Ling Wu; Huasong Cai; Tao Chan; Yanji Luo; Zhi Dong; Keguo Zheng; Zi-Ping Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Evaluating a preoperative protocol that includes magnetic resonance imaging for lymph node metastasis in the Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP) in Thailand.

Authors:  Metha Songthamwat; Nittaya Chamadol; Narong Khuntikeo; Jadsada Thinkhamrop; Supinda Koonmee; Nathaphop Chaichaya; Jeffrey Bethony; Bandit Thinkhamrop
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 9.  Radiologic Evaluation and Structured Reporting Form for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer: 2019 Consensus Recommendations from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Authors:  Dong Ho Lee; Bohyun Kim; Eun Sun Lee; Hyoung Jung Kim; Ji Hye Min; Jeong Min Lee; Moon Hyung Choi; Nieun Seo; Sang Hyun Choi; Seong Hyun Kim; Seung Soo Lee; Yang Shin Park; Yong Eun Chung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.