Philippa Dalach1, Ravi Savarirayan2, Gareth Baynam3,4,5, Julie McGaughran6,7, Emma Kowal8, Libby Massey9,10, Misty Jenkins11, Yin Paradies8, Margaret Kelaher12. 1. Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. philippa.dalach@unimelb.edu.au. 2. Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute and University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 3. Western Australian Department of Health, Genetic Services of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 4. Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies, Western Australian Department of Health, Perth, Australia. 5. Telethon Kids Institute and Division of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. 6. Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 7. School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia. 8. Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia. 9. Machado Joseph Disease Foundation, Alyangula, Northern Territory, Australia. 10. James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia. 11. Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 12. Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people do not enjoy equal access to specialist health services that adequately meet their needs. Clinical genetics services are at the vanguard of realising the health benefits of genomic medicine. As the field continues to expand in clinical utility and implementation, it is critical that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are able to participate and benefit equally to avoid further widening of the existing health gap. This is the first study to explore barriers to accessing clinical genetics services among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, which has been acknowledged as a key strategic priority in Australian genomic health policy. METHODS: A participatory design process engaged a majority-Aboriginal Project Reference Group and Aboriginal End-User Group. 63 semi-structured interviews were conducted with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people who had accessed the government-funded clinical genetics service in Western Australia, Queensland or the Northern Territory between 2014 and 2018. The sample included patients, parents and carers. Participants were asked to recount their 'patient journey', from referral through to post-appointment and reflect on their perceptions of genetics and its implications for the health of themselves and their families. Analysis tracked chronological service engagement, followed by an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Barriers to access and engagement were present at each stage of the patient journey. These included challenges in obtaining a referral, long waiting periods, limited genetic literacy, absence of Aboriginal support services, communication challenges and lack of adequate psychosocial support and follow-up after attendance. Participants' overall experiences of attending a genetic health service were varied, with positive perceptions tied closely to a diagnosis being achieved. The experience of (and expectation for) recognition of cultural identity and provision of culturally safe care was low among participants. Unaddressed concerns continued to cause significant distress in some people years after their appointment took place. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant scope for improving the care provided to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people at clinical genetics services. Immediate attention to minimising logistical barriers, developing relationships with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services and providing practical and specific cultural safety training for practitioners is required at the service-level. Our findings strongly support the development of guidelines or policies recognising the collective cultural needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in relation to genomic health care.
BACKGROUND: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people do not enjoy equal access to specialist health services that adequately meet their needs. Clinical genetics services are at the vanguard of realising the health benefits of genomic medicine. As the field continues to expand in clinical utility and implementation, it is critical that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are able to participate and benefit equally to avoid further widening of the existing health gap. This is the first study to explore barriers to accessing clinical genetics services among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, which has been acknowledged as a key strategic priority in Australian genomic health policy. METHODS: A participatory design process engaged a majority-Aboriginal Project Reference Group and Aboriginal End-User Group. 63 semi-structured interviews were conducted with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people who had accessed the government-funded clinical genetics service in Western Australia, Queensland or the Northern Territory between 2014 and 2018. The sample included patients, parents and carers. Participants were asked to recount their 'patient journey', from referral through to post-appointment and reflect on their perceptions of genetics and its implications for the health of themselves and their families. Analysis tracked chronological service engagement, followed by an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Barriers to access and engagement were present at each stage of the patient journey. These included challenges in obtaining a referral, long waiting periods, limited genetic literacy, absence of Aboriginal support services, communication challenges and lack of adequate psychosocial support and follow-up after attendance. Participants' overall experiences of attending a genetic health service were varied, with positive perceptions tied closely to a diagnosis being achieved. The experience of (and expectation for) recognition of cultural identity and provision of culturally safe care was low among participants. Unaddressed concerns continued to cause significant distress in some people years after their appointment took place. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant scope for improving the care provided to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people at clinical genetics services. Immediate attention to minimising logistical barriers, developing relationships with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services and providing practical and specific cultural safety training for practitioners is required at the service-level. Our findings strongly support the development of guidelines or policies recognising the collective cultural needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in relation to genomic health care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aboriginal and Torres Strait islanders; Access to health care; Cultural safety; Genetic health services; Indigenous Australians
Authors: Maui Hudson; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Rogena Sterling; Nadine R Caron; Keolu Fox; Joseph Yracheta; Jane Anderson; Phil Wilcox; Laura Arbour; Alex Brown; Maile Taualii; Tahu Kukutai; Rodney Haring; Ben Te Aika; Gareth S Baynam; Peter K Dearden; David Chagné; Ripan S Malhi; Ibrahim Garba; Nicki Tiffin; Deborah Bolnick; Matthew Stott; Anna K Rolleston; Leah L Ballantyne; Ray Lovett; Dominique David-Chavez; Andrew Martinez; Andrew Sporle; Maggie Walter; Jeff Reading; Stephanie Russo Carroll Journal: Nat Rev Genet Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 53.242
Authors: Andrew A Somogyi; Daniel T Barratt; Elizabeth J Phillips; Kylies Moore; Fahmida Ilyas; Genevieve M Gabb Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Gareth Baynam; Caron Molster; Alicia Bauskis; Emma Kowal; Ravi Savarirayan; Margaret Kelaher; Simon Easteal; Libby Massey; Gail Garvey; Jack Goldblatt; Nicholas Pachter; Tarun S Weeramanthri; Hugh J S Dawkins Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2017 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Simon Easteal; Ruth M Arkell; Renzo F Balboa; Shayne A Bellingham; Alex D Brown; Tom Calma; Matthew C Cook; Megan Davis; Hugh J S Dawkins; Marcel E Dinger; Michael S Dobbie; Ashley Farlow; Kylie G Gwynne; Azure Hermes; Wendy E Hoy; Misty R Jenkins; Simon H Jiang; Warren Kaplan; Stephen Leslie; Bastien Llamas; Graham J Mann; Brendan J McMorran; Rebekah E McWhirter; Cliff J Meldrum; Shivashankar H Nagaraj; Saul J Newman; Jack S Nunn; Lyndon Ormond-Parker; Neil J Orr; Devashi Paliwal; Hardip R Patel; Glenn Pearson; Greg R Pratt; Boe Rambaldini; Lynette W Russell; Ravi Savarirayan; Matthew Silcocks; John C Skinner; Yassine Souilmi; Carola G Vinuesa; Gareth Baynam Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Dan M Roden; Sara L Van Driest; Jonathan D Mosley; Quinn S Wells; Jamie R Robinson; Joshua C Denny; Josh F Peterson Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 6.875