| Literature DB >> 33861898 |
Eugene Joeh1, Abigail E Reeves1, Christopher G Parker2, Mia L Huang1,2.
Abstract
Interactions between glycans and glycan-binding proteins (GBPs) consist of weak, noncovalent, and transient binding events, making them difficult to study in live cells void of a static, isolated system. Furthermore, the glycans are often presented as protein glycoconjugates, but there are limited efforts to identify these proteins. Proximity labeling permits covalent tagging of the glycoprotein interactors to query GBP in live cells. Coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry, it facilitates determination of the proteins bearing the interacting glycans. In this method, fusion protein constructs of a GBP of interest with a peroxidase enzyme allows for in situ spatiotemporal radical-mediated tagging of interacting glycoproteins in living cells that can be enriched for identification. Using this method, the capture and study of glycan-GBP interactions no longer relies on weak, transient interactions, and results in robust capture and identification of the interactome of a GBP while preserving the native cellular environment. This protocol focuses on (1) expression and characterization of a recombinant fusion protein consisting of a peroxidase and the GBP galectin-3, (2) corresponding in situ labeling and visualization of interactors, (3) and proteomic workflow and analysis of captured proteins for robust identification using mass spectrometry.Entities:
Keywords: galectin; glycan; proteomics; proximity labeling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33861898 PMCID: PMC8274366 DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Protoc ISSN: 2691-1299
Figure 1.Overview of in situ proximity tagging with glycan-biding proteins (GBPs), such as galectin-3 (here shown as Gal-3). A fusion protein construct of the GBP and a peroxidase (here shown as PX) is exogenously incubated with live cells, where it freely interacts with its glycoprotein counter-receptors. The subsequent addition of biotin-phenol and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) leads to the formation of reactive biotin phenoxyl radicals to covalently tag nearby electron-rich residues with biotin. The biotin-tagged proteins are enriched by streptavidin agarose beads and analyzed by quantitative mass-spectrometry based proteomics. Figure adapted from PNAS, 2020; 117(44), 27329. Copyright 2020 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Figure 2.Examples of protein characterization. (A) Stain-free imaging of SDS-PAGE gel of the different samples collected during the protein purification process (S1: supernatant from Ni-NTA beads; E1: Eluate from Ni-NTA beads; S2 Lac: supernatant from α-lactose beads; E2 Lac: Eluate from α-lactose beads). (B) Binding curve of PX-Gal3 from an ELISA plate coated with asialofetuin glycoprotein. Figure adapted from PNAS, 2020; 117(44), 27329. Copyright 2020 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Figure 3.Examples of in situ labeling visualization and validation. (A) Fluorescence microscopy images of dose-dependent labeling of PX-Gal3 in LX-2 hepatic stellate cells. Increases in Cy-5 fluorescence (purple) indicates enhancements in PX-Gal3 labeling. (B) Immunoblot (IB) analysis of biotinylated proteins detected using streptavidin-HRP following proximity labeling with 100 nM PX-Gal3 as well as cells co-incubated with 100 mM lactose to evaluate binding competition. Figure adapted from PNAS, 2020; 117(44), 27329. Copyright 2020 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Figure 4.Representative plots from the analysis of proteomics results. (A) Graph representation the correlation between statistically significant proteins and highly enriched proteins from PX-Gal3 over the negative treatment. (B) Graph representation of the correlation between statistically significant proteins and highly competed proteins from PX-Gal3 over PX-Gal3 co-incubated with lactose. (C) Correlation of the statistically significant proteins between the competition and enrichment ratio. Orange labeled proteins represent top target proteins identified chosen for potential validation. Figure adapted from PNAS, 2020; 117(44), 27329. Copyright 2020 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
| Problem: | Possible Cause: | Solution: |
|---|---|---|
| Absorbance signals from ELISA inconsistent among replicates | Temperature at which chemiluminescence substrate was added varied. | Pre-warm the substrate at room temperature at least an hour prior to use, in the dark. |
| Low yield in protein expression | Low expression during induction | Perform multiple, parallel small scale bacterial expression and test a range of IPTG concentrations and/or time/temperature of induction |
| Fluorescence signal from | Not enough recombinant fusion protein during incubation | Perform labeling with a range of concentrations and/or treatment duration for recombinant fusion protein, biotin phenol, and/or H2O2 |
| No signal from SDS-PAGE gel or western blot | Insufficient protein loading | Load more protein initially |
| Cell lysate concentration too low for 1.5–2.0 mg/mL normalization for proteomics | Cells may not produce as large of lysate concentration | Seed more cells and/or use more or larger plates for experiment |
| TMT signal from the different samples vary greatly | Poor pipetting | Use protein lo-bind pipette tips and protein lo-bind tubes rather than standard Eppendorf tubes |
| Final sample before loading onto the high-resolution MS instrument contains precipitate | Insufficient desalting | Desalt again using a new C18 desalting column |
| Large contamination of keratin in proteomics sample | Contamination from skin/hair | Clean up the entire bench that the proteomics workflow will be performed at with 70% ethanol |