Literature DB >> 23628597

Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE.

Nasim Mavaddat1, Susan Peock, Debra Frost, Steve Ellis, Radka Platte, Elena Fineberg, D Gareth Evans, Louise Izatt, Rosalind A Eeles, Julian Adlard, Rosemarie Davidson, Diana Eccles, Trevor Cole, Jackie Cook, Carole Brewer, Marc Tischkowitz, Fiona Douglas, Shirley Hodgson, Lisa Walker, Mary E Porteous, Patrick J Morrison, Lucy E Side, M John Kennedy, Catherine Houghton, Alan Donaldson, Mark T Rogers, Huw Dorkins, Zosia Miedzybrodzka, Helen Gregory, Jacqueline Eason, Julian Barwell, Emma McCann, Alex Murray, Antonis C Antoniou, Douglas F Easton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reliable estimates of cancer risk are critical for guiding management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. The aims of this study were to derive penetrance estimates for breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and contralateral breast cancer in a prospective series of mutation carriers and to assess how these risks are modified by common breast cancer susceptibility alleles.
METHODS: Prospective cancer risks were estimated using a cohort of 978 BRCA1 and 909 BRCA2 carriers from the United Kingdom. Nine hundred eighty-eight women had no breast or ovarian cancer diagnosis at baseline, 1509 women were unaffected by ovarian cancer, and 651 had been diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer. Cumulative risks were obtained using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Associations between cancer risk and covariables of interest were evaluated using Cox regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: The average cumulative risks by age 70 years for BRCA1 carriers were estimated to be 60% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 44% to 75%) for breast cancer, 59% (95% CI = 43% to 76%) for ovarian cancer, and 83% (95% CI = 69% to 94%) for contralateral breast cancer. For BRCA2 carriers, the corresponding risks were 55% (95% CI = 41% to 70%) for breast cancer, 16.5% (95% CI = 7.5% to 34%) for ovarian cancer, and 62% (95% CI = 44% to 79.5%) for contralateral breast cancer. BRCA2 carriers in the highest tertile of risk, defined by the joint genotype distribution of seven single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with breast cancer risk, were at statistically significantly higher risk of developing breast cancer than those in the lowest tertile (hazard ratio = 4.1, 95% CI = 1.2 to 14.5; P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Prospective risk estimates confirm that BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers are at high risk of developing breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer. Our results confirm findings from retrospective studies that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles in combination are predictive of breast cancer risk for BRCA2 carriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23628597     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djt095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  283 in total

1.  RE: Breast Cancer Risk After Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Healthy BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: Revisiting the Evidence for Risk Reduction.

Authors:  Xinglei Chai; Susan Domchek; Noah Kauff; Timothy Rebbeck; Jinbo Chen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Response.

Authors:  B A M Heemskerk-Gerritsen; M J Hooning; M A Rookus
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Triple assessment is not necessary in most young women referred with breast symptoms.

Authors:  D Yue; C Swinson; D Ravichandran
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  The Two Faces of Adjuvant Glucocorticoid Treatment in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir Djedovic; Yoo-Young Lee; Alexandra Kollara; Taymaa May; Theodore J Brown
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.869

5.  Defects in homologous recombination repair genes are associated with good prognosis and clinical sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents in pancreatic cancer: A case report.

Authors:  Amir Sonnenblick; Aviad Zick; Myriam Maoz; Sherri Cohen; Luna Kadouri; Tamar Peretz; Ayala Hubert
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-09

6.  Clinical background and outcomes of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in Japan.

Authors:  Hidetaka Nomura; Masayuki Sekine; Shiro Yokoyama; Masami Arai; Takayuki Enomoto; Nobuhiro Takeshima; Seigo Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  The Changing Landscape of Genetic Testing for Inherited Breast Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Anosheh Afghahi; Allison W Kurian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-05

8.  Germline BRCA mutation evaluation in a prospective triple-negative breast cancer registry: implications for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome testing.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma; Jennifer R Klemp; Bruce F Kimler; Jonathan D Mahnken; Larry J Geier; Qamar J Khan; Manana Elia; Carol S Connor; Marilee K McGinness; Joshua M W Mammen; Jamie L Wagner; Claire Ward; Lori Ranallo; Catherine J Knight; Shane R Stecklein; Roy A Jensen; Carol J Fabian; Andrew K Godwin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Perceptions of risk and reward in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers choosing salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.

Authors:  Talayeh S Ghezelayagh; Lauren E Stewart; Barbara M Norquist; Deborah J Bowen; Vivian Yu; Kathy J Agnew; Kathryn P Pennington; Elizabeth M Swisher
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Oncologic Safety of Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in a Population With BRCA Mutations: A Multi-institutional Study.

Authors:  James W Jakub; Anne Warren Peled; Richard J Gray; Rachel A Greenup; John V Kiluk; Virgilio Sacchini; Sarah A McLaughlin; Julia C Tchou; Robert A Vierkant; Amy C Degnim; Shawna Willey
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.