| Literature DB >> 33854133 |
Laura Adelaide Dalla Vecchia1, Beatrice De Maria2, Giuseppina Cassetti2, Letizia Clementi3, Valeria De Grazia2, Francesca Perego2, Alberto Porta4,5.
Abstract
The conciliation between career and family is a relevant issue for working women, in particular during the first years of motherhood. Data about the state of the cardiac autonomic regulation in working women with preschoolers are lacking. Aim of this study was to compare the cardiac autonomic profile of female healthcare professionals with and without preschoolers via the analysis of the variability of the time distance between two consecutive R-wave peaks (RR) from standard 24-h Holter electrocardiogram (ECG). Fifty healthy active female healthcare professionals were enrolled: 25 with at least one preschooler (W_KID) and 25 without (W_NOKID). A standard Holter ECG was obtained during a regular working day. Segments of 5000 consecutive RRs were selected during daytime (DAY) and nighttime (NIGHT). Heart rate variability analysis was performed and the following parameters were considered for comparison between the two groups: mean (μRR), variance (σ2RR), and the absolute power in high frequency component (HF) of RR (HFRR) series. HFRR was considered as a marker of vagal cardiac modulation. Only µRR significantly increased from DAY to NIGHT in both groups (699 ± 88 vs 887 ± 140 ms in W_KID and 728 ± 90 vs 942 ± 166 ms in W_NOKID). Instead, σ2RR and HFRR increased from DAY to NIGHT only in W_NOKID (from 3334 ± 2153 to 4816 ± 4063 ms2 and from 356 ± 334 to 1397 ± 1629 ms2, respectively). W_KID showed lower σ2RR and HFRR during NIGHT, compared to W_NOKID (2336 ± 3170 vs 4816 ± 4063 ms2 and 556 ± 950 vs 1397 ± 1629 ms2, respectively). The perceived stress according to the visual analogue scale was similar in the two groups (4.7 ± 2.1 in W_KID, 5.7 ± 2.1 in W_NOKID). The presence of preschoolers lowered nocturnal cardiac vagal modulation in female healthcare professionals. This might represent an adaptation with a finalistic purpose, scilicet the facilitation of a prompt reaction in case of a child's need.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33854133 PMCID: PMC8047021 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87596-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic and clinical features of the enrolled population.
| W_NOKID (n = 25) | W_KID (n = 25) | Cohen’s | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 35.4 ± 7.2 | 37.7 ± 5.6 | 0.220 | 0.357 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.7 ± 3.7 | 23.4 ± 3.1 | 0.496 | 0.205 |
| SAP (mmHg) | 108 ± 11 | 109 ± 13 | 0.893 | 0.083 |
| DAP (mmHg) | 67 ± 10 | 70 ± 10 | 0.459 | 0.300 |
| Sleep per night (h) | 6.6 ± 0.9 | 6.4 ± 1.3 | 0.472 | 0.179 |
| Smoking, n (%) | 7 (28) | 5 (20) | 0.741 | 0.094 |
| Regular physical exercise, n (%) | 12 (48) | 8 (32) | 0.386 | 0.247 |
| Physical exercise (h/week) | 3.0 ± 1.6 | 2.7 ± 1.9 | 0.604 | 0.171 |
| Regular social activities, n (%) | 23 (92) | 17 (68) | 0.077 | 0.516 |
| Social activities (h/week) | 7.4 ± 8.0 | 3.3 ± 2.3 | 0.060 | 0.696 |
| Employment | 0.212 | 0.629 | ||
| Nurse, n (%) | 7 (28) | 10 (40) | ||
| Physician, n (%) | 4 (16) | 6 (24) | ||
| Physiotherapist, n (%) | 13 (52) | 6 (24) | ||
| Nursing assistant, n (%) | 1 (4) | 3 (12) | ||
| Working hours (h/day) | 7.9 ± 1.0 | 7.7 ± 1.4 | 0.174 | 0.164 |
| Working experience (years) | 10.9 ± 5.7 | 12.6 ± 4.5 | 0.280 | 0.332 |
W_NOKID, women without preschoolers; W_KID, women with at least one preschooler; BMI, body mass index; SAP, systolic arterial pressure; DAP, diastolic arterial pressure; p, type I error probability; Cohen’s d, Cohen’s standardized mean difference between groups. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage).
Figure 1Results of perceived stress evaluation according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in W_NOKID (dark bar) and W_KID (white bar). Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 2Results of power spectral analysis of heart rate variability during DAY and NIGHT in W_NOKID group (dark bars) and W_KID group (white bars). The indices μRR (a), σ2RR (b), and HFRR (c) are shown. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The symbol * indicates p < 0.05 DAY vs NIGHT. The symbol # indicates p < 0.05 W_KID vs W_NOKID.
Figure 3Illustrative examples of power spectral density of RR variability during DAY (left panels) and during NIGHT (right panels) computed in one subject of the W_KID group (top panels) and in one subject of W_NOKID group (bottom panels). Each 3D graph shows the power spectral density (PSD, z-axis) of the RR series as a function of the progressive frame of analysis (window, y-axis) and frequency (x-axis).
Results of the correlation between heart rate variability indices and VAS scale of perceived stress.
| W_NOKID | W_KID | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p | ρ | p | r | p | ρ | p | |
| μRR during DAY (ms) | − 0.336 | 0.101 | 0.220 | 0.287 | − 0.009 | 0.965 | 0.033 | 0.873 |
| σ2RR during DAY (ms2) | − 0.089 | 0.670 | 0.075 | 0.717 | 0.001 | 0.999 | − 0.063 | 0.761 |
| HFRR during DAY (ms2) | − 0.028 | 0.894 | 0.066 | 0.750 | − 0.062 | 0.768 | 0.032 | 0.876 |
| μRR during NIGHT (ms) | − 0.139 | 0.508 | − 0.197 | 0.341 | 0.171 | 0.413 | 0.220 | 0.287 |
| σ2RR during NIGHT (ms2) | − 0.053 | 0.801 | − 0.028 | 0.890 | − 0.154 | 0.464 | 0.075 | 0.717 |
| HFRR during NIGHT (ms2) | − 0.014 | 0.946 | − 0.096 | 0.644 | − 0.166 | 0.428 | 0.067 | 0.750 |
W_NO KID, women without preschoolers; W_KID, women with preschoolers; RR, RR interval; μRR, mean of RR; σ2RR, RR variance; HFRR, absolute power in high frequency band of the RR; DAY, daytime; NIGHT, nighttime; r, Pearson product moment correlation coefficient; ρ, Spearman rank correlation coefficient; p, type I error probability. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Results of the correlation between heart rate variability indices and children’s age.
| r | p | ρ | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| μRR during DAY (ms) | 0.098 | 0.642 | 0.104 | 0.615 |
| σ2RR during DAY (ms2) | − 0.197 | 0.345 | − 0.200 | 0.334 |
| HFRR during DAY (ms2) | − 0.072 | 0.732 | − 0.259 | 0.334 |
| μRR during NIGHT (ms) | − 0.065 | 0.759 | − 0.048 | 0.815 |
| σ2RR during NIGHT (ms2) | − 0.280 | 0.175 | − 0.277 | 0.178 |
| HFRR during NIGHT (ms2) | − 0.219 | 0.293 | − 0.228 | 0.270 |
DAY, daytime; NIGHT, nighttime; μRR, mean of RR; σ2RR, RR variance; HFRR, absolute power in high frequency band of the RR series; r, Pearson product moment correlation coefficient; ρ, Spearman rank correlation coefficient; p, type I error probability.