Tim Stockwell1,2, Jinhui Zhao1, Sapna Panwar3, Audra Roemer1, Timothy Naimi4, Tanya Chikritzhs3,2. 1. Centre for Addictions Research of BC, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. 2. National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. 3. Institute for Scientific Analysis, San Francisco, California. 4. Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Previous meta-analyses of cohort studies indicate a J-shaped relationship between alcohol consumption and allcause mortality, with reduced risk for low-volume drinkers. However, low-volume drinkers may appear healthy only because the "abstainers" with whom they are compared are biased toward ill health. The purpose of this study was to determine whether misclassifying former and occasional drinkers as abstainers and other potentially confounding study characteristics underlie observed positive health outcomes for lowvolume drinkers in prospective studies of all-cause mortality. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of studies investigating alcohol use and mortality risk after controlling for quality-related study characteristics was conducted in a population of 3,998,626 individuals, among whom 367,103 deaths were recorded. RESULTS: Without adjustment, meta-analysis of all 87 included studies replicated the classic J-shaped curve, with low-volume drinkers (1.3-24.9 g ethanol per day) having reduced mortality risk (RR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.83, 0.90]). Occasional drinkers (<1.3 g per day) had similar mortality risk (RR = 0.84, 95% CI [0.79, 0.89]), and former drinkers had elevated risk (RR = 1.22, 95% CI [1.14, 1.31]). After adjustment for abstainer biases and quality-related study characteristics, no significant reduction in mortality risk was observed for low-volume drinkers (RR = 0.97, 95% CI [0.88, 1.07]). Analyses of higher-quality bias-free studies also failed to find reduced mortality risk for low-volume alcohol drinkers. Risk estimates for occasional drinkers were similar to those for low- and medium-volume drinkers. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of mortality risk from alcohol are significantly altered by study design and characteristics. Meta-analyses adjusting for these factors find that low-volume alcohol consumption has no net mortality benefit compared with lifetime abstention or occasional drinking. These findings have implications for public policy, the formulation of low-risk drinking guidelines, and future research on alcohol and health.
OBJECTIVE: Previous meta-analyses of cohort studies indicate a J-shaped relationship between alcohol consumption and allcause mortality, with reduced risk for low-volume drinkers. However, low-volume drinkers may appear healthy only because the "abstainers" with whom they are compared are biased toward ill health. The purpose of this study was to determine whether misclassifying former and occasional drinkers as abstainers and other potentially confounding study characteristics underlie observed positive health outcomes for lowvolume drinkers in prospective studies of all-cause mortality. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of studies investigating alcohol use and mortality risk after controlling for quality-related study characteristics was conducted in a population of 3,998,626 individuals, among whom 367,103 deaths were recorded. RESULTS: Without adjustment, meta-analysis of all 87 included studies replicated the classic J-shaped curve, with low-volume drinkers (1.3-24.9 g ethanol per day) having reduced mortality risk (RR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.83, 0.90]). Occasional drinkers (<1.3 g per day) had similar mortality risk (RR = 0.84, 95% CI [0.79, 0.89]), and former drinkers had elevated risk (RR = 1.22, 95% CI [1.14, 1.31]). After adjustment for abstainer biases and quality-related study characteristics, no significant reduction in mortality risk was observed for low-volume drinkers (RR = 0.97, 95% CI [0.88, 1.07]). Analyses of higher-quality bias-free studies also failed to find reduced mortality risk for low-volume alcohol drinkers. Risk estimates for occasional drinkers were similar to those for low- and medium-volume drinkers. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of mortality risk from alcohol are significantly altered by study design and characteristics. Meta-analyses adjusting for these factors find that low-volume alcohol consumption has no net mortality benefit compared with lifetime abstention or occasional drinking. These findings have implications for public policy, the formulation of low-risk drinking guidelines, and future research on alcohol and health.
Authors: I H M Friesema; P J Zwietering; M Y Veenstra; J A Knottnerus; H F L Garretsen; P H H M Lemmens Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Yvonne Kelly; Amanda Sacker; Ron Gray; John Kelly; Dieter Wolke; Maria A Quigley Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2008-10-30 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Camillia K Lui; William C Kerr; Libo Li; Nina Mulia; Yu Ye; Edwina Williams; Thomas K Greenfield; E Anne Lown Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: William C Kerr; Camillia K Lui; Edwina Williams; Yu Ye; Thomas K Greenfield; E Anne Lown Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-01-07 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Kassi L Kosnicki; Jerrold C Penprase; Patricia Cintora; Pedro J Torres; Greg L Harris; Susan M Brasser; Scott T Kelley Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Emily C Williams; Judith A Hahn; Richard Saitz; Kendall Bryant; Marlene C Lira; Jeffrey H Samet Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Sarah M Wilson; Thomas K Burroughs; Amie R Newins; Eric A Dedert; Alyssa M Medenblik; Scott D McDonald; Jean C Beckham; Patrick S Calhoun Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Sarah M Hartz; Mary Oehlert; A C Horton; Richard A Grucza; Sherri L Fisher; Robert C Culverhouse; Karl G Nelson; Scott W Sumerall; Paul C Neal; Patrice Regnier; Guoqing Chen; Alexander Williams; Jagriti Bhattarai; Bradley Evanoff; Laura J Bierut Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 3.455