Literature DB >> 3385202

Observer bias in blood pressure studies.

N G Bruce1, A G Shaper, M Walker, G Wannamethee.   

Abstract

Observer variation in blood pressure measurement following training with standard techniques has been investigated in a study of 7735 middle-aged men. The initial training produced consistent results between observers, but there were progressive deteriorations in the ensuing months. Subsequent re-training led to marked though inconsistent reductions in variation, but within 1 or 2 months, observers reverted back to an individual level of bias. The magnitude of observer variation is in line with the few other published accounts, and is sufficient to have important implications for group comparisons, clinical trials, and the clinical care of individual patients. Four methods of reducing observer variation are considered: regular re-training, self-measurement and ambulatory monitoring, automatic sphygmomanometers, and adjustment in the analysis. The adjustment procedure used in the British Regional Heart Study is described. Regular and frequent re-training with monitoring of performance, or the use of automatic machines are presently considered the two most practical methods of reducing observer variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3385202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  20 in total

1.  Geographic variation in incidence of coronary heart disease in Britain: the contribution of established risk factors.

Authors:  R W Morris; P H Whincup; F C Lampe; M Walker; S G Wannamethee; A G Shaper
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Difference in blood pressure readings with mercury and automated devices: Impact on hypertension prevalence estimates in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Arnaud Chiolero; Jean-Pierre Gervasoni; Anne Rwebogora; Marianna Balampama; Fred Paccaud; Pascal Bovet
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Accurate blood pressure measurements and the other arm: the doctor is ultimately responsible.

Authors:  Herbert L Fred
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

4.  Measuring blood pressure in the elderly: does atrial fibrillation increase observer variability?

Authors:  D Sykes; R Dewar; K Mohanaruban; K Donovan; F Nicklason; D M Thomas; D Fisher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-01-20

5.  Serum urate and the risk of major coronary heart disease events.

Authors:  S G Wannamethee; A G Shaper; P H Whincup
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Ambulatory blood pressure improves prediction of cardiovascular risk: implications for better antihypertensive management.

Authors:  Lawrence R Krakoff
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.113

7.  The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions.

Authors:  P H Whincup; N G Bruce; D G Cook; A G Shaper
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Incidence and predictors of hypertension in adults with HIV-initiating antiretroviral therapy in south-western Uganda.

Authors:  Samson Okello; Michael Kanyesigye; Winnie R Muyindike; Brian Herb Annex; Peter W Hunt; Sebastien Haneuse; Mark Jacob Siedner
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  ABO blood group and ischaemic heart disease in British men.

Authors:  P H Whincup; D G Cook; A N Phillips; A G Shaper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-30

10.  Ischaemic heart disease: association with haematocrit in the British Regional Heart Study.

Authors:  G Wannamethee; A G Shaper; P H Whincup
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.