Ulrike Boehmer1, Jennifer Potter2,3,4, Melissa A Clark5,6, Michael Winter7, Flora Berklein7, Rachel M Ceballos8, Kevan Hartshorn9, Al Ozonoff2,10. 1. Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Crosstown Center, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. boehmer@bu.edu. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. 4. The Fenway Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. 6. Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA. 7. Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 9. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. 10. Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine receipt of follow-up surveillance among sexual minority and heterosexual survivors and identify survivor-, physician-, and practice-level characteristics associated with follow-up surveillance. METHODS: An average of 3 years after their stage I-III colorectal cancer diagnosis, we recruited survivors from four cancer registries. A questionnaire, which queried about sexual orientation and other eligibility criteria, was mailed to all cancer survivors. Subsequently, 418 eligible survivors without recurrent disease participated in a telephone survey. Colorectal cancer-specific follow-up surveillance was defined as colonoscopy, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) test, or imaging test. We used logistic regression with forward selection to obtain models that best explained each follow-up test. RESULTS: About 10% of survivors received no follow-up surveillance, while 70% had colonoscopies. While survivors irrespective of sexual orientation received follow-up surveillance, sexual minority survivors had 3 times the odds of receiving imaging tests compared to heterosexual survivors. Having a designated provider of any specialty was most salient for the receipt of surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual minority survivors' greater receipt of imaging tests may indicate providers perceive them at greater risk for recurrence than heterosexual survivors. Future studies need to examine provider behaviors towards monitoring colorectal cancer survivors of diverse sexual orientations. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Guidelines recommend surveillance of colorectal cancer survivors to improve survival. This study showed that having a designated provider for follow-up is most salient for the receipt of surveillance, most survivors receive surveillance, and sexual minority survivors had more imaging tests compared to heterosexual survivors.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine receipt of follow-up surveillance among sexual minority and heterosexual survivors and identify survivor-, physician-, and practice-level characteristics associated with follow-up surveillance. METHODS: An average of 3 years after their stage I-III colorectal cancer diagnosis, we recruited survivors from four cancer registries. A questionnaire, which queried about sexual orientation and other eligibility criteria, was mailed to all cancer survivors. Subsequently, 418 eligible survivors without recurrent disease participated in a telephone survey. Colorectal cancer-specific follow-up surveillance was defined as colonoscopy, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) test, or imaging test. We used logistic regression with forward selection to obtain models that best explained each follow-up test. RESULTS: About 10% of survivors received no follow-up surveillance, while 70% had colonoscopies. While survivors irrespective of sexual orientation received follow-up surveillance, sexual minority survivors had 3 times the odds of receiving imaging tests compared to heterosexual survivors. Having a designated provider of any specialty was most salient for the receipt of surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual minority survivors' greater receipt of imaging tests may indicate providers perceive them at greater risk for recurrence than heterosexual survivors. Future studies need to examine provider behaviors towards monitoring colorectal cancer survivors of diverse sexual orientations. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Guidelines recommend surveillance of colorectal cancer survivors to improve survival. This study showed that having a designated provider for follow-up is most salient for the receipt of surveillance, most survivors receive surveillance, and sexual minority survivors had more imaging tests compared to heterosexual survivors.
Authors: E Carter Paulson; Christine M Veenstra; Anil Vachani; Christine A Ciunci; Andrew J Epstein Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Scott R Steele; George J Chang; Samantha Hendren; Marty Weiser; Jennifer Irani; W Donald Buie; Janice F Rafferty Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Charles S Kamen; Marilyn Smith-Stoner; Charles E Heckler; Marie Flannery; Liz Margolies Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Khaled El-Shami; Kevin C Oeffinger; Nicole L Erb; Anne Willis; Jennifer K Bretsch; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman; Rachel S Cannady; Sandra L Wong; Johnie Rose; April L Barbour; Kevin D Stein; Katherine B Sharpe; Durado D Brooks; Rebecca L Cowens-Alvarado Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Pamela B Mangu; Patrick J Flynn; Larissa Korde; Charles L Loprinzi; Bruce D Minsky; Nicholas J Petrelli; Kim Ryan; Deborah H Schrag; Sandra L Wong; Al B Benson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Phyllis Brawarsky; Bridget A Neville; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Craig Earle; Jennifer S Haas Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-11-26 Impact factor: 6.860