Charles S Kamen1, Marilyn Smith-Stoner2, Charles E Heckler3, Marie Flannery4, Liz Margolies5. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center in New York. 2. Department of Nursing, California State University, San Bernardino. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Rochester. 4. Department of Nursing, University of Rochester. 5. National LGBT Cancer Network, New York, NY.
Abstract
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe factors related to diagnosis, identity disclosure, and social support among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) patients with cancer, and to explore associations between these factors and self-rated health. DESIGN: Cross-sectional self-report survey design using descriptive and exploratory multivariate statistical approaches. SETTING: Online, Internet-based. SAMPLE: 291 LGBT patients (89% Caucasian; 50% gay, 36% lesbian, 7% bisexual, 3% transgender) with mixed cancers. METHODS: Participants completed a researcher-designed online survey assessing experiences of cancer diagnosis among LGBT patients at a single time point. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Demographics, which provider(s) delivered the patients' cancer diagnoses, to whom patients had disclosed their LGBT identity, how they disclosed, who was on their social support team at the time of diagnosis, and current self-rated health. FINDINGS: 79% of participants reported disclosing their identities to more than one cancer care provider. Participants most commonly introduced the topic of LGBT identity themselves, sometimes as a way to correct heterosexual assumptions (34%). Friends were the most common members of LGBT patients' support teams (79%). Four disclosure and support factors were consistently associated with better self-rated health. CONCLUSIONS: Disclosure of LGBT identity is a common experience in the context of cancer care, and disclosure and support factors are associated with better self-reported health among LGBT patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Creating safe environments for LGBT patients to disclose could improve cancer care delivery to this underserved population. Nurses and other providers should acknowledge and include diverse support team members in LGBT patients' care.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe factors related to diagnosis, identity disclosure, and social support among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) patients with cancer, and to explore associations between these factors and self-rated health. DESIGN: Cross-sectional self-report survey design using descriptive and exploratory multivariate statistical approaches. SETTING: Online, Internet-based. SAMPLE: 291 LGBT patients (89% Caucasian; 50% gay, 36% lesbian, 7% bisexual, 3% transgender) with mixed cancers. METHODS:Participants completed a researcher-designed online survey assessing experiences of cancer diagnosis among LGBT patients at a single time point. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Demographics, which provider(s) delivered the patients' cancer diagnoses, to whom patients had disclosed their LGBT identity, how they disclosed, who was on their social support team at the time of diagnosis, and current self-rated health. FINDINGS: 79% of participants reported disclosing their identities to more than one cancer care provider. Participants most commonly introduced the topic of LGBT identity themselves, sometimes as a way to correct heterosexual assumptions (34%). Friends were the most common members of LGBT patients' support teams (79%). Four disclosure and support factors were consistently associated with better self-rated health. CONCLUSIONS: Disclosure of LGBT identity is a common experience in the context of cancer care, and disclosure and support factors are associated with better self-reported health among LGBT patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Creating safe environments for LGBT patients to disclose could improve cancer care delivery to this underserved population. Nurses and other providers should acknowledge and include diverse support team members in LGBT patients' care.
Entities:
Keywords:
cancer; health disparities; sexual orientation; social support
Authors: P Fobair; K O'Hanlan; C Koopman; C Classen; S Dimiceli; N Drooker; D Warner; H Davids; J Loulan; D Wallsten; D Goffinet; G Morrow; D Spiegel Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2001 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Elizabeth J Cathcart-Rake; Tyler Zemla; Aminah Jatoi; Kathryn E Weaver; Heather Neuman; Anne E Kazak; Ruth Carlos; Lucy Gansauer; Joseph M Unger; Nicholas M Pajewski; Charles Kamen Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Benjamin D Capistrant; Lindsey Lesher; Nidhi Kohli; Enyinnaya N Merengwa; Badrinath Konety; Darryl Mitteldorf; William G West; B R Simon Rosser Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Janella Hudson; Matthew B Schabath; Julian Sanchez; Steven Sutton; Vani N Simmons; Susan T Vadaparampil; Peter A Kanetsky; Gwendolyn P Quinn Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Hannah Brooks; Carrie D Llewellyn; Tom Nadarzynski; Fernando Castilho Pelloso; Felipe De Souza Guilherme; Alex Pollard; Christina J Jones Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2018-01-29 Impact factor: 5.386