Karolina Lisy1,2, Micah D J Peters3, Penelope Schofield1,4,5, Michael Jefford1,2,5. 1. Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 2. Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Division of Health Sciences, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 4. Department of Psychology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 5. Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore the cancer care experiences and unmet needs of people who identify as a sexual or gender minority. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis was undertaken based on a registered protocol. Following literature searching and study selection, study quality was examined by using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme Checklist. Qualitative data were extracted verbatim from included studies and synthesized by using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen studies that included lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people living with or beyond cancer were included in the review. Studies including gender minorities were not identified. Most of the study participants were sexual minority women with breast cancer or sexual minority men with prostate cancer. Meta-synthesis of 106 individual findings generated 6 overarching themes pertaining to sexual orientation disclosure, experiences and fear of homophobia, positive and negative health-care professional behaviors, heterocentric systems and care, inadequacy of available support groups, and unmet needs for patient-centered care and LGB-specific information. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual people often reported feelings of anxiety, invisibility, isolation, and frustration throughout the cancer care continuum. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the experiences of LGB people with cancer care shows that LGB people face numerous challenges due to their sexual orientation and receive care that does not adequately address their needs. Training and education of health-care professionals are strongly recommended to address some of these challenges and practice gaps. Culturally appropriate care includes avoiding heterosexual assumptions, use of inclusive language, the provision of tailored information, and involving partners in care.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the cancer care experiences and unmet needs of people who identify as a sexual or gender minority. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis was undertaken based on a registered protocol. Following literature searching and study selection, study quality was examined by using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme Checklist. Qualitative data were extracted verbatim from included studies and synthesized by using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen studies that included lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people living with or beyond cancer were included in the review. Studies including gender minorities were not identified. Most of the study participants were sexual minority women with breast cancer or sexual minority men with prostate cancer. Meta-synthesis of 106 individual findings generated 6 overarching themes pertaining to sexual orientation disclosure, experiences and fear of homophobia, positive and negative health-care professional behaviors, heterocentric systems and care, inadequacy of available support groups, and unmet needs for patient-centered care and LGB-specific information. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual people often reported feelings of anxiety, invisibility, isolation, and frustration throughout the cancer care continuum. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the experiences of LGB people with cancer care shows that LGB people face numerous challenges due to their sexual orientation and receive care that does not adequately address their needs. Training and education of health-care professionals are strongly recommended to address some of these challenges and practice gaps. Culturally appropriate care includes avoiding heterosexual assumptions, use of inclusive language, the provision of tailored information, and involving partners in care.
Authors: Smita C Banerjee; Jessica M Staley; Koshy Alexander; Chasity B Walters; Patricia A Parker Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Matthew B Schabath; Catherine A Blackburn; Megan E Sutter; Peter A Kanetsky; Susan T Vadaparampil; Vani N Simmons; Julian A Sanchez; Steven K Sutton; Gwendolyn P Quinn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kelly M Shaffer; Erin Kennedy; Jillian V Glazer; Anita H Clayton; Wendy Cohn; Trish A Millard; Lee M Ritterband; Shayna Showalter Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ulrike Boehmer; Jennifer Potter; Melissa A Clark; Michael Winter; Flora Berklein; Rachel M Ceballos; Kevan Hartshorn; Al Ozonoff Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Tonia C Poteat; Mary Anne Adams; Jowanna Malone; Sophia Geffen; Naomi Greene; Michael Nodzenski; Alexandre G Lockhart; I-Hsuan Su; Lorraine T Dean Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Tess Thompson; Katie Heiden-Rootes; Miriam Joseph; L Anne Gilmore; LaShaune Johnson; Christine M Proulx; Emily L Albright; Maria Brown; Jane A McElroy Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2020-07-18 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Ulrike Boehmer; Al Ozonoff; Michael Winter; Flora Berklein; Jennifer Potter; Kevan L Hartshorn; Kevin C Ward; Rachel M Ceballos; Melissa A Clark Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 6.921