Literature DB >> 33850267

The efficacy of CRISPR-mediated cytosine base editing with the RPS5a promoter in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Minkyung Choi1, Jae-Young Yun1,2, Jun-Hyuk Kim3, Jin-Soo Kim4, Sang-Tae Kim5,6.   

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing is an important and versatile technology in modern biological research. Recent advancements include base-editing CRISPR tools that enable targeted nucleotide substitutions using a fusion protein comprising a nickase variant of Cas9 and a base deaminase. Improvements in base editing efficiencies and inheritable of edited loci need to be made to make CRISPR a viable system in plants. Here, we report efficiency of cytosine base editors (CBEs) in Arabidopsis thaliana by applying the strong endogenous RPS5a promoter to drive the expression of nickase Cas9 and either rAPOBEC1 from rat (BE3) or the PmCDA1 activation-induced cytidine deaminase from sea lamprey (AIDv2). Compared with the strong heterologous CaMV35S promoter of viral origin, the RPS5a promoter improved CBE efficiency by 32% points with the number of T1 plants showing over 50% conversion ratio when the LFY gene was targeted. CBE induced nonsense mutations in LFY via C-to-T conversion, which resulted in loss-of-function lfy phenotypes; defects in LFY function were associated with the targeted base substitutions. Our data suggest that optimal promoter choice for CBE expression may affect base-editing efficiencies in plants. The results provide a strategy to optimize low-efficiency base editors and demonstrate their applicability for functional assays and trait development in crop research.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33850267     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87669-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  34 in total

Review 1.  Expanding the Biologist's Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Samuel H Sternberg; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Precise Editing of a Target Base in the Rice Genome Using a Modified CRISPR/Cas9 System.

Authors:  Yuming Lu; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 13.164

4.  Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion.

Authors:  Zenpei Shimatani; Sachiko Kashojiya; Mariko Takayama; Rie Terada; Takayuki Arazoe; Hisaki Ishii; Hiroshi Teramura; Tsuyoshi Yamamoto; Hiroki Komatsu; Kenji Miura; Hiroshi Ezura; Keiji Nishida; Tohru Ariizumi; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion.

Authors:  Yuan Zong; Yanpeng Wang; Chao Li; Rui Zhang; Kunling Chen; Yidong Ran; Jin-Long Qiu; Daowen Wang; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  [Study of the mechanism of ultraviolet inactivation of enzymes. Photolysis of amino acid residues in enzymes (pepsin and trypsin) by ultraviolet irradiation].

Authors:  N I Perrase; N V Kondakova; T N Kalabukhova; Iu A Vladimirov; L Kh Eĭdus
Journal:  Biofizika       Date:  1968 Jan-Feb

Review 7.  Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors.

Authors:  Andrew V Anzalone; Luke W Koblan; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Serum and cell-mediated viral-specific delayed cutaneous basophil reactions during cytomegalovirus infection of guinea pigs.

Authors:  B P Griffith; P W Askenase; G D Hsiung
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  1982-05-01       Impact factor: 4.868

9.  Composition and nutritive value of pejibaye (Bactris gasipaes) in animal feeds.

Authors:  M E Zumbado; M G Murillo
Journal:  Rev Biol Trop       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 0.723

10.  Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems.

Authors:  Keiji Nishida; Takayuki Arazoe; Nozomu Yachie; Satomi Banno; Mika Kakimoto; Mayura Tabata; Masao Mochizuki; Aya Miyabe; Michihiro Araki; Kiyotaka Y Hara; Zenpei Shimatani; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Functional Association of ACQOS/VICTR with Salt Stress Resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana Was Confirmed by CRISPR-Mediated Mutagenesis.

Authors:  Sang-Tae Kim; Minkyung Choi; Su-Ji Bae; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Heritable base-editing in Arabidopsis using RNA viral vectors.

Authors:  Degao Liu; Shuya Xuan; Lynn E Prichard; Lilee I Donahue; Changtian Pan; Ugrappa Nagalakshmi; Evan E Ellison; Colby G Starker; Savithramma P Dinesh-Kumar; Yiping Qi; Daniel F Voytas
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 8.005

Review 3.  Comprehending the evolution of gene editing platforms for crop trait improvement.

Authors:  Priyanka Dhakate; Deepmala Sehgal; Samantha Vaishnavi; Atika Chandra; Apekshita Singh; Soom Nath Raina; Vijay Rani Rajpal
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  From Genome Sequencing to CRISPR-Based Genome Editing for Climate-Resilient Forest Trees.

Authors:  Hieu Xuan Cao; Giang Thi Ha Vu; Oliver Gailing
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.