Literature DB >> 33842814

Conceptualizing intubation sharing: A descriptive qualitative study of videolaryngoscopy for pediatric emergency airway management.

Kelsey A Miller1, Ashley Marchese1, Donna Luff2, Joshua Nagler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study characterizes clinical and educational practices around the use of videolaryngoscopy in pediatric emergency airway management through qualitative exploration.
METHODS: This is a descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of emergency medicine physicians. Physicians were selected by theoretical sampling from urban, tertiary care pediatric hospitals across the United States until theoretical data saturation was achieved. The study applied a constructivist grounded theory approach to data collection and analysis. Manual line-by-line coding of interview transcripts was used initially, then grouped into categories with constant comparative analysis to generate the final coding scheme organized by themes and subthemes. Finally, memo-writing and iterative analysis meetings explored relationships between themes and identified an interpretive model.
RESULTS: Theoretical saturation was achieved after 10 of the initial 12 interviews. Emerging from the data were six themes that describe the concept of intubation sharing: (1) Videolaryngoscopy encompasses multiple modalities that all provide a shared view and ability to record; (2) Airway experts and systems help realize the full potential of videolaryngoscopy; (3) Videolaryngoscopy can be a clinical, educational, quality assurance and research tool; (4) Some skills required for videolaryngoscopy are unique, while others overlap with direct laryngoscopy; (5) Videolaryngoscopy allows a coaching laryngoscopist to provide real-time guidance to the primary laryngoscopist from a shared view; (6) Videolaryngoscopy provides an opportunity for post-intubation coaching and feedback and shared learning from a single experience for the provider community.
CONCLUSIONS: Through this multicenter qualitative interview study, we derived the concept of intubation sharing through videolaryngoscopy for real-time and remote coaching, for both the primary laryngoscopist and the community of emergency medicine providers who intubate.
© 2021 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway management; intubation; pediatrics; videolaryngoscopy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33842814      PMCID: PMC8019533          DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AEM Educ Train        ISSN: 2472-5390


  21 in total

1.  Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success rates, duration, and adverse effects.

Authors:  Colm P F O'Donnell; C Omar F Kamlin; Peter G Davis; Colin J Morley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Neonatal intubation: success of pediatric trainees.

Authors:  Tina A Leone; Wade Rich; Neil N Finer
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Assessing procedural skills training in pediatric residency programs.

Authors:  Michael G Gaies; Christopher P Landrigan; Janet P Hafler; Thomas J Sandora
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Video-assisted instruction improves the success rate for tracheal intubation by novices.

Authors:  K J Howard-Quijano; Y M Huang; R Matevosian; M B Kaplan; R H Steadman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Video Versus Direct and Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Tracheal Intubations.

Authors:  Amy H Kaji; Carolyn Shover; Jennifer Lee; Lisa Yee; Daniel J Pallin; Michael D April; Jestin N Carlson; Andrea Fantegrossi; Calvin A Brown
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 6.  Pediatric video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Yi Lu; Yan Huang; Hong Jiang
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.556

7.  Predicting neonatal intubation competency in trainees.

Authors:  Stephen D DeMeo; Lakshmi Katakam; Ronald N Goldberg; David Tanaka
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates).

Authors:  Ibtihal S Abdelgadir; Robert S Phillips; Davinder Singh; Michael P Moncreiff; Joanne L Lumsden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-24

9.  Failure of pediatric and neonatal trainees to meet Canadian Neonatal Resuscitation Program standards for neonatal intubation.

Authors:  Z Bismilla; E Finan; P J McNamara; V LeBlanc; A Jefferies; H Whyte
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study.

Authors:  Calvin A Brown; Amy H Kaji; Andrea Fantegrossi; Jestin N Carlson; Michael D April; Robert W Kilgo; Ron M Walls
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.451

View more
  1 in total

1.  Emergency Pediatric Intubations in an Urban Children's Hospital Before and After Just-in-Time Training for Video Laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Evan Lum; Sherri Sommer-Candelario; So Yung Choi; Stephanie Delos Santos; Kagen Aeby; Jannet Lee-Jayaram
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.