Stephen D DeMeo1, Lakshmi Katakam2, Ronald N Goldberg3, David Tanaka3. 1. Division of Neonatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and stephen.demeo@duke.edu. 2. Division of Neonatology, University of Texas, Houston, Texas. 3. Division of Neonatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pediatric residency training programs are graduating residents who are not competent in neonatal intubation, a vital skill needed for any pediatrician involved in delivery room resuscitations. However, a precise definition of competency during training is lacking. The objective of this study was to more precisely define the trajectory toward competency in neonatal intubation for pediatric residents, as a framework for later evaluating complementary training tools. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center observational study of resident-performed neonatal intubations at Duke University Medical Center between 2005 and 2013. Using a Bayesian statistical model, intubation competency was defined when the resident attained a 75% likelihood of intubating their next patient successfully. RESULTS: A total of 477 unique intubation attempts by 105 residents were analyzed. The path to proficiency was defined by a categorical or milestone learning event after which all learners move toward competency in a similar manner. In our cohort, 4 cumulative successes were needed to achieve competency. Only 24 of 105 (23%) achieved competency during the study period. Residents who failed their first 2 opportunities, compared with those successful on their first 2 opportunities, needed nearly double the intubation exposure to achieve competency. CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian statistics may be useful to more precisely describe neonatal intubation competency in residents. Achieving competency in neonatal intubation appears to be a categorical or milestone learning event whose timing varies between residents. The current educational environment does not provide adequate procedural exposure to achieve competency for most residents.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pediatric residency training programs are graduating residents who are not competent in neonatal intubation, a vital skill needed for any pediatrician involved in delivery room resuscitations. However, a precise definition of competency during training is lacking. The objective of this study was to more precisely define the trajectory toward competency in neonatal intubation for pediatric residents, as a framework for later evaluating complementary training tools. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center observational study of resident-performed neonatal intubations at Duke University Medical Center between 2005 and 2013. Using a Bayesian statistical model, intubation competency was defined when the resident attained a 75% likelihood of intubating their next patient successfully. RESULTS: A total of 477 unique intubation attempts by 105 residents were analyzed. The path to proficiency was defined by a categorical or milestone learning event after which all learners move toward competency in a similar manner. In our cohort, 4 cumulative successes were needed to achieve competency. Only 24 of 105 (23%) achieved competency during the study period. Residents who failed their first 2 opportunities, compared with those successful on their first 2 opportunities, needed nearly double the intubation exposure to achieve competency. CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian statistics may be useful to more precisely describe neonatal intubation competency in residents. Achieving competency in neonatal intubation appears to be a categorical or milestone learning event whose timing varies between residents. The current educational environment does not provide adequate procedural exposure to achieve competency for most residents.
Authors: Elizabeth E Foglia; Anne Ades; Taylor Sawyer; Kristen M Glass; Neetu Singh; Philipp Jung; Bin Huey Quek; Lindsay C Johnston; James Barry; Jeanne Zenge; Ahmed Moussa; Jae H Kim; Stephen D DeMeo; Natalie Napolitano; Vinay Nadkarni; Akira Nishisaki Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Xiao Xiao; Shang Zhao; Yan Meng; Lamia Soghier; Xiaoke Zhang; James Hahn Journal: Proc IEEE Conf Virtual Real 3D User Interfaces Date: 2020-05-11
Authors: Hannah R Stinson; Vijay Srinivasan; Alexis A Topjian; Robert M Sutton; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert A Berg; Tia T Raymond Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: C H Backes; E M Bonachea; B K Rivera; M M Reynolds; C E Kovalchin; K M Reber; M K Ball; R Sutsko; S R Guntupalli; C V Smith; J D Mahan; M M Carbajal Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Maki Ishizuka; Vijayeta Rangarajan; Taylor L Sawyer; Natalie Napolitano; Donald L Boyer; Wynne E Morrison; Justin L Lockman; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Akira Nishisaki Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Patrick A Ross; Branden M Engorn; Christopher J L Newth; Chloe Gordon; Gerardo Soto-Campos; Anoopindar K Bhalla Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-03-05
Authors: Mohammad A A Bayoumi; Einas E Elmalik; Hossamaldein Ali; Sunitha D'Souza; Jojo Furigay; Ava Romo; Sunitha Shyam; Rajvir Singh; Olfa Koobar; Jihad Al Shouli; Matheus van Rens; Fouad F Abounahia; Ashraf Gad; Mostafa Elbaba; Samawal Lutfi Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 3.418