Yi-Wen Huang1, Chien-Wei Lin2, Pan Pan3, Carla Elena Echeveste3, Athena Dong3, Kiyoko Oshima4, Martha Yearsley5, Jianhua Yu6, Li-Shu Wang3. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 2. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 3. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 6. Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Comprehensive Cancer Center, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Abstract
Free fatty acid receptor 2 (FFAR2) has been reported as a tumor suppressor in colon cancer development. The current study investigated the effects of FFAR2 signaling on energy metabolism and gut microbiota profiling in a colorectal cancer mouse model (Apc Min/+ ). Ffar2 deficiency promoted colonic polyp development and enhanced fatty acid oxidation and bile acid metabolism. Gut microbiome sequencing analysis showed distinct clustering among wild-type, Apc Min/+ , and Apc Min/+ -Ffar2 -/- mice. The relative abundance of Flavobacteriaceae and Verrucomicrobiaceae was significantly increased in the Apc Min/+ -Ffar2 -/- mice compared to the Apc Min/+ mice. In addition, knocking-down FFAR2 in the human colon cancer cell lines (SW480 and HT29) resulted in increased expression of several key enzymes in fatty acid oxidation, such as carnitine palmitoyltransferase 2, acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, C-2 to C-3 short chain, and hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase/enoyl-CoA hydratase, alpha subunit. Collectively, these results demonstrated that Ffar2 deficiency significantly altered profiles of fatty acid metabolites and gut microbiome, which might promote colorectal cancer development.
Free fatty acid receptor 2 (FFAR2) has been reported as a tumor suppressor in colon cancer development. The current study investigated the effects of FFAR2 signaling on energy metabolism and gut microbiota profiling in a colorectal cancermouse model (Apc Min/+ ). Ffar2deficiency promoted colonic polyp development and enhanced fatty acid oxidation and bile acid metabolism. Gut microbiome sequencing analysis showed distinct clustering among wild-type, Apc Min/+ , and Apc Min/+ -Ffar2 -/- mice. The relative abundance of Flavobacteriaceae and Verrucomicrobiaceae was significantly increased in the Apc Min/+ -Ffar2 -/- mice compared to the Apc Min/+ mice. In addition, knocking-down FFAR2 in the humancolon cancer cell lines (SW480 and HT29) resulted in increased expression of several key enzymes in fatty acid oxidation, such as carnitine palmitoyltransferase 2, acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, C-2 to C-3 short chain, and hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase/enoyl-CoA hydratase, alpha subunit. Collectively, these results demonstrated that Ffar2deficiency significantly altered profiles of fatty acid metabolites and gut microbiome, which might promote colorectal cancer development.
Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in both sexes in the United States [1]. Many factors are associated with the development of colorectal cancer, such as “unhealthy” diets [2-6], gut inflammation [7-10], and microbial dysbiosis [11-14].Free fatty acid receptor 2 (FFAR2, also named GPR43) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family and is expressed on the adipose tissue, leukocytes [15], and colon [16,17]. FFAR2 receptor can be activated by the short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetate, butyrate, and propionate, which are produced during fermentation of the undigested carbohydrates and dietary fiber by gut microbiota [18]. FFAR2 signaling has been reported as a negative regulator of inflammation. For example, dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced ulcerative colitis, a strong risk factor for colorectal cancer in humans, was enhanced in the Ffar2 deficient (Ffar2-/-) mice compared to the wild-type (WT) mice [19-21]. In addition, a potential tumor-suppressive role of Ffar2 in colon cancer has been reported by our group [22,23] and others [24,25]. The decreased FFAR2 expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma tissues compared to the normal tissues has been observed in humanpatients [22,24]. However, whether loss of FFAR expression is associated with altered biochemical metabolites and microbial dysbiosis in colorectal cancer is unknown. Using black raspberries containing plenty of soluble fibers that can be metabolized into SCFAs by gut bacteria, we have demonstrated that the berries can modulate gut bacterial metabolites in colorectal cancerpatients [26] and animals bearing colorectal cancer [27,28]. Interestingly, various components in black raspberries exerted different effects on gut microbiota [29]. Most importantly, we further showed that loss of Ffar2 significantly dampened the anti-colorectal cancer effects of black raspberries [22]. Accordingly, our previous results suggest that functional Ffar2 is vital for high-fiber foods to exert anti-colorectal cancer activities.Our current study demonstrated that loss of Ffar2 promoted the colon adenomas development in the Apcmice. Besides, using a mass spectrometry-based metabolomic analysis, we determined the effects of Ffar2deficiency on the metabolites. The 16S rRNA gene sequence-based microbial analysis was conducted to determine if loss of Ffar2 could change the gut bacterial composition. Lastly, we knocked-down FFAR2 in the humancolon cancer cell lines to determine its effects on the Expression of the key enzymes that are involved in energy metabolism.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals and cell lines
All protocols followed institutional guidelines for animal care dictated by the Medical College of Wisconsin Animal Care and Use Committee (AUA2430). Breeding pairs of the WT and Apcmice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Breeding pairs of the Ffar2 heterozygous (Ffar2+/-) mice were purchased from Deltagen, Inc. (San Mateo, CA, USA). Four-week-old WT, Apc, and Apc-Ffar2-/- mice were fed the synthetic diet AIN-76A from the American Institute of Nutrition (Dyets Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA) for 8 weeks. Mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation. The number and the burden of polyps were determined. The colonic mucosa and plasma specimens were collected from a subgroup of the WT mice (n = 4), Apcmice (n = 5) and Apc-Ffar2-/- mice (n = 5) for metabolomic profiling. The cecal fecal specimens were collected from a subgroup of the WT mice (n = 5), Apcmice (n = 5), and Apc-Ffar2-/- mice (n = 5) for microbial analysis.Humancolorectal cancer cells HT29 and SW480 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) in April 2016 and were cultured as recommended by ATCC.
Metabolomic profiling
Specimen preparation and extraction, mass spectrometer platforms and setting, and data analysis were conducted by Metabolon, Inc. (Morrisville, NC, USA) [30-32] according to the previous description [26,27]. Briefly, samples were prepared using an automated MicroLab STAR® system (Reno, NV, USA). Homogenized mucosa samples were extracted using 5 µL of methanol per mg tissue, and the plasma samples were extracted using 5 µL of methanol per mL tissue. Samples were characterized using the ultra-high-performance-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) in the negative ion mode, the UHPLC-MS/MS in the positive ion mode, and the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) after sialylation. Chemical entities were identified by comparing them to the metabolomic library of purified standards based on chromatographic properties and mass spectra.
DNA preparation and PCR amplification
Cecal feces were collected from a subgroup of the WT mice (n = 5), Apcmice (n = 5), and Apc-Ffar2-/- mice (n = 5). The fecal DNA samples were isolated using the PowerSoil® DNA Isolation Kit (MO Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 515F-806R region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR (94°C for 3 minutes, followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 45 seconds, 50°C for 60 seconds, and 72°C for 90 seconds and a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes, hold at 4°C) using primers 515F 5’-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3’ and 806R 5’-barcode-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’ [33]. PCR reactions were performed in triplicate with 25 µL of the reaction mixtures containing 10 μL of the five primers hot master mix (2200410; MO Bio Laboratories), 0.5 µL of each primer (10 µM) and 1 µL of the template DNA.
Illumina MiSeq sequencing
The PCR products were quantified by Picogreen (P11496; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Two hundred and forty ng of the DNA was pooled for each sample and purified using UltraClean PCR Clean-Up kit (12500; Mo Bio Laboratories) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was conducted using a paired-end, 2 × 250-bp cycle run on an Illumina MiSeq sequencing system and MiSeq Reagent Kit version 2 (500 Cycle) chemistry. Illumina BaseSpace’s 16s Metagenomics App was used to analyze the results.
Sequencing data analysis
To provide an even level of coverage for clustering and statistical comparisons, raw taxonomic counts were subsampled to 13,995 sequences per sample and aggregated at phylum through genus levels using QIIME [34]. Differential abundance analysis comparing the WT, Apc, and Apc-Ffar2-/- groups utilized the negative binomial test [35] with P-value adjustment using the False Discovery Rate [36]. Adjusted P-values that were less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Hierarchical clustering was performed using Ward’s method with log-normalized proportional values in R.
Immunoblotting analysis
Protein lysates of the humancolorectal cancer cell lines were used for immunoblotting analysis. FFAR2-shRNA constructs to knockdown FFAR2 were purchased from OriGene Technologies, Inc. (Rockville, MD, USA), as indicated previously [23]. Antibodies to carnitine palmitoyltransferase 2 (CTP2) (ab181114), acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, long-chain (ACADL) (ab152160), acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, C-2 to C-3 short chain (ACADS) (ab156571), and hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase/enoyl-CoA hydratase, alpha subunit (HADHA) (ab203114) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA) and were used to identify their respective proteins. Antibody to β-actin (691001) was purchased from MP Biomedical (Santa Ana, CA, USA) and was used as a loading control.
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA was employed in R version 2.14.2 [37] to identify statistically significant metabolite differences across genotypes. Standard statistical analyses are performed in ArrayStudio on log transformed data. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Ffar2 deficiency promoted the development of colonic polyps
The WT, Apc, and Apc-Ffar2-/- mice were given the AIN-76A diet for 8 weeks. Forty % (4/10) of the Apcmice developed colonic polyps, whereas the Apc-Ffar2-/- mice have an 100% (8/8) incidence of colonic polyps development with an increased number (Fig. 1A) and burden (Fig. 1B) of colonic polyps, which were consistent with our previous studies with an increase Ki-67 staining as a proliferation marker and H&E staining [22].
Figure 1
Loss of Ffar2 promotes colon adenoma development.
Colonic polyp number (A) and burden (B) from 12-14 weeks old, the Apc and Apc-Ffar2-/- mice were measured. Ffar2, free fatty acid receptor 2. *P < 0.05.
Ffar2 deficiency enhanced the long-chain fatty acid β-oxidation and bile acid metabolism
To determine the effects of Ffar2deficiency on the metabolic profiles, we collected the colonic mucosa and plasma specimens and conducted a mass spectrometry-based nontargeted metabolomic analysis. Five hundred and sixteen plasma metabolites and 568 colonic mucosa metabolites were annotated. Of these, 128 plasma metabolites and 75 colonic mucosa metabolites were significantly changed across three genotypes. Similar metabolic alterations, including 59 plasma metabolites (Table S1) and 23 mucosa metabolites (Table S2), have been observed in both the Apc and Apc-Ffar2-/- mice compared to the WT mice. More importantly, Ffar2deficiency further modulated 31 plasma metabolites (Table S3) and 28 mucosa metabolites (Table S4). Significantly changed metabolites were analyzed using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database to identify biochemical pathways.Fatty acids are oxidized in the mitochondria to generate energy and intermediates for cell proliferation. We observed significantly decreased fatty acid levels, including the medium-chain fatty acids, long-chain fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids in both the Apc and Apc-Ffar2-/- mice (Table 1). Also, the production of acetylcarnitine, the end-product of fatty acid β-oxidation, was significantly increased in plasma of both the Apc and Apc-Ffar2-/- mice (Table 2). Carnitine-conjugated long-chain fatty acids were markedly increased in the Apc-Ffar2-/- mice compared to Apcmice (Table 1), suggesting the long-chain fatty acid β-oxidation were enhanced by the Ffar2deficiency. Acetylcarnithine can be converted to acetyl-CoA, which enters into the citric acid cycle to generate 3-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) through ketogenesis. We observed a significant accumulation of BHBA in plasma of the Apc-Ffar2-/- mice (Table 1). These results indicate an increased mitochondrial activity and a higher demand for energy by cancer cells.
Table 1
List of significantly changed metabolites involved in the fatty acid β-oxidation pathway
Metabolites
Biochemical pathways
Metabolites
Fold control
A/WT
AF/WT
Mucosa
Medium chain fatty acid
5-dodecenoate (12:1n7)
0.48b
0.4b
Long chain fatty acid
Margarate (17:0)
0.35b
0.39b
Eicosenoate (20:1)
0.25b
0.29b
Erucate (22:1n9)
0.23b
0.34b
Polyunsaturated fatty acid (n3 and n6)
Docosadienoate (22:2n6)
0.34b
0.44b
Dihomo-linoleate (20:2n6)
0.31b
0.32b
Plasma
Polyunsaturated fatty acid (n3 and n6)
Dihomo-linolenate (20:3n3 or n6)
0.43b
0.59b
Docosapentaenoate (n6 DPA; 22:5n6)
0.46b
0.51b
Fatty acid metabolism (Acyl Carnitine)
Acetylcarnitine
1.57a
1.83a
Decanoylcarnitine
1.44a
2a
AF/WT
AF/A
Mucosa
Fatty acid metabolism (Acyl Carnitine)
3-hydroxybutyrylcarnitine
4.34a
2.73a
Stearoylcarnitine
1.68a
1.4a
Plasma
Fatty acid metabolism (Acyl Carnitine)
Cis-4-decenoyl carnitine
1.94a
1.69a
Laurylcarnitine
1.48a
1.42a
Myristoylcarnitine
1.65a
1.71a
Palmitoylcarnitine
1.6a
1.84a
Stearoylcarnitine
1.92a
1.5a
Myristoleoylcarnitine
1.54a
1.62a
Suberoylcarnitine
3.5a
3.08a
Adipoylcarnitine
3.5a
2.51a
Ketone bodies
3-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA)
5.46a
3.53a
Fold change is calculated as the ratio of the Apc (A) vs. WT, Apc-Ffar2 (AF) vs. WT, and Apc-Ffar2 vs. Apc. Fold change that is labeled a or b presents significantly increased or significantly decreased, respectively. WT, wild-type. P < 0.05.
Table 2
List of significantly changed metabolites in the bile acid pathway
Metabolites
Biochemical pathways
Metabolites
Fold control
A/WT
AF/WT
Mucosa
Primary bile acid metabolism
Cholate sulfate
0.05b
0.25b
Plasma
Secondary bile acid metabolism
Deoxycholate
3.19a
2.03a
A/WT
AF/WT
AF/A
Mucosa
Primary bile acid metabolism
Cholate
1.33
4.49a
3.38a
Chenodeoxycholate
1.13
4.95a
4.37a
Beta-muricholate
0.86
2.68a
3.11a
Secondary bile acid metabolism
Deoxycholate
3.02a
7.65a
2.53a
Taurodeoxycholate
2.75
6.29a
2.28a
6-beta-hydroxylithocholate
2.1a
4.29a
2.05a
7-ketolithocholate
5.92a
11.94a
2.02a
Hyocholate
0.84
3.55a
4.23a
3-dehydrocholate
1.11
3.1a
2.8a
7-ketodeoxycholate
0.9
3.83a
4.24a
Fold change is calculated as the ratio of the Apc (A) vs. WT, Apc-Ffar2 (AF) vs. WT, and Apc-Ffar2 vs. Apc. Fold change that is labeled a or b presents significantly increased or significantly decreased, respectively. WT, wild-type. P < 0.05.
Primary bile acids are synthesized by cholesterol catabolism in the liver and subsequently conjugated [38]. In the intestine, intestinal bacteria could deconjugate a significant portion of the primary bile acids, and structurally modify them into the secondary bile acids, which have been shown to promote colon carcinogenesis [38]. We observed significantly increased levels of both the primary and secondary bile acids in colonic mucosa in the Apc-Ffar2-/- mice compared to the Apcmice, including cholate, chenodeoxycholate, deoxycholate, and taurodeoxycholate (Table 2). Deoxycholate has been demonstrated to promote colon carcinogenesis by 165.1% in the Apcmice [39]. Thus, our findings suggest that an increased deoxycholate level could directly contribute to the Ffar2deficiency-promoted colon cancer development.
Ffar2 deficiency changed the expression of key enzymes in the fatty acid β-oxidation pathway
After observing significant levels of the carnitine-conjugated long-chain fatty acids in the Apc-Ffar2-/- mice compared to Apc, we further investigated if loss of Ffar2 could alter the expression of the key enzymes involved in the fatty acid β-oxidation pathway. We first determined the endogenous expression levels of FFAR2 in four humancolon cancer cell lines, and found higher levels of FFAR2 expression in SW480 and HT29 cell lines [23]. Furthermore, we knocked-down FFAR2 using shRNA in SW480 and HT29 cells as previously [23]. We observed increased expression levels of several key enzymes in the fatty acid β-oxidation pathway, including CPT2, ACADL, ACADS, and HADHA (Fig. 2A and 2B). This finding suggests the enhanced fatty acid β-oxidation in the FFAR2-deficient colon cancer cells.
Figure 2
FFAR2 deficiency significantly increased the expression of key enzymes in the fatty acid β-oxidation pathway.
Immunoblotting of CPT2, ACADS/L and HADHA in the SW480 (A) and HT29 (B) cells treated with either the vector or the FFAR2-shRNA to knockdown FFAR2. Numbers under each blot indicate the fold differences. FFAR2, free fatty acid receptor 2; ACADL, acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, long chain; ACADS, acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, C-2 to C-3 short chain; CPT2, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 2; HADHA, hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase/enoyl-CoA hydratase, alpha subunit.
Ffar2 deficiency changed gut microbiota composition
Evidence has been accumulated to imply the interplay between gut dysbiosis and colorectal cancer [40]. In order to investigate the effects of Ffar2deficiency on the gut microbiome, we performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the cecal fecal samples. Principal coordinate analyses showed clustering according to genotypes (Fig. 3A). The relative abundance of bacteria at the family level (Fig. 3B) showed increased levels of Porphyromonadaceae, Sphingobacteriaceae, Deferribacteraceae, Flavobacteriaceae, and Verrucomicrobiaceae and decreased levels of Ruminococcaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae in both the Apcmice and Apc-Ffar2-/- mice compared to the WT mice. In particular, Flavobacteriaceae and Verrucomicrobiaceae were further increased in the Apc-Ffar2-/- mice compared to the Apcmice, which might contribute to the Ffar2deficiency-promoted colon cancer development (Fig. 3C).
Figure 3
The Apc-Ffar2-/- mice show a structurally different microbiota compared to the Apc mice.
(A) Assessment of the structure of microbial communities by principal coordinate analyses. Plots were presented for gut bacteria sequenced at species levels. (B) Relative abundance of bacteria presented at the family level. (C) Relative abundance of Flavobacteriaceae and Verrucomicrobiaceae were significantly increased in the Apc-Ffar2-/- mice compared to the Apc mice. FFAR2, free fatty acid receptor 2; WT, wild-type. *P < 0.05.
DISCUSSION
Our previous studies and those of other groups have shown that the expression of FFAR2 was decreased in adenocarcinoma tissues compared to normal tissues of patients with colorectal cancer [22,24]. Our current study, by utilizing Apcmice, demonstrated that Ffar2deficiency promoted the development of colonic polyps. All the Apc-Ffar2-/- mice developed colonic polyps compared to only 40% of the Apcmice. The Apc-Ffar2-/- mice developed increased tumor burden of colonic polyps. In addition, we investigated if Ffar2deficiency has effects on the metabolic profiles and the gut bacterial composition. Thirty-one plasma metabolites and 28 colonic mucosa metabolites were changed in the Apc-Ffar2-/- mice compared to the Apcmice. Analysis using KEGG data suggests that loss of Ffar2 enhances the long-chain fatty acid β-oxidation and the bile acid metabolism. Furthermore, Ffar2deficiency markedly increased the abundance of Flavobacteriaceae and Verrucomicrobiaceae.Previously we observed significantly decreased fatty acid levels in the colonic mucosa of Apcmice [27]. Similarly, the current study detected reduced levels of 11 fatty acids, including medium-chain fatty acids, long-chain fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids, in the colonic mucosa of Apcmice (Table S2). Six of these fatty acids were also significantly decreased in the colonic mucosa of Apc-Ffar2-/- mice (Table 1). In addition, Apc-Ffar2-/- mice showed a substantial accumulation of carnitine-conjugated long-chain fatty acids in both colonic mucosa and plasma specimens (Table 1), including stearoylcarnitine, laurylcarnitine, myristoylcarnitine, and palmitoylcarnitine. Increased levels of these carnitine-conjugated long-chain fatty acids have been observed in tumor samples from biofilm-positive colorectal cancerpatients [41], suggesting association among the increased fatty acid β-oxidation, loss of Ffar2, and gut microbiota.Enhanced fatty acid β-oxidation has been reported in colon cancerpatients [42,43]. Our study used humancolon cancer cell lines to investigate if the functional FFAR2 could influence the key enzymes of the fatty acid oxidation pathway. Based on relatively higher expression levels of FFAR2 in the SW480 and HT29 cells compared to the Caco-2 and HCT116 cells, we knock-downed FFAR2 in the SW480 and HT29 cells [23]. Using the FFAR2 knocked-down cells, we found that the expression levels of several key enzymes in the fatty acid oxidation pathway have been increased in the FFAR2-deficient cells, including CPT2, ACADL, ACADS, and HADHA.CPT2 has been shown to be over-expressed in primary prostate cancer [44], and knocking-down of CPT2 inhibited the tumor growth in triple-negative breast cancer [45]. Thus, our findings on increased CPT2 expression in FFAR2-deficient cells could be one of the mechanisms responsible for loss of FFAR2-enhanced colon cancer development.HADHA has also been reported to be decreased in breast cancer [46] and clear cell renal cell carcinoma [47]. However, we observed increased expression of HADHA in the FFAR2-deficient SW480 and HT29 cells. These results, combined with increased expression of CPT2, ACADL, and ACADS in the FFAR2-deficient cells, suggest an overall accelerated fatty acid oxidation, which may contribute to the FFAR2deficiency-promoted colon cancer development.A strong link between microbial dysbiosis and colon cancer has been intensively explored. However, due to the complexity of the gut microbiome, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Our current study demonstrated that loss of Ffar2 significantly changed the composition of microbiota in the Apcmice. Decreased Bifidobacterium and has been observed in humancolon cancer tissues [25]. Also, increased Peptostreptococcaceae has been positively associated with biofilm and an enhanced acetylated polyamines pathway in humancolon cancerpatients, which promote colon cancer development [41]. In our study, the profile of gut microbiome was found to be significantly changed in the polyp-bearing mice (Apc and Apc-Ffar2-/- mice) compared to WT mice, as revealed by the decreased abundance of Bifidobacterium and increased proportion of Peptostreptococcaceae. More importantly, the abundance of Flavobacteriaceae and Verrucomicrobiaceae was raised in the Apcmice compared to WT mice and further increased in Apc-Ffar2-/- mice, which might contribute to Ffar2deficiency-enhanced colon cancer development.We previously reported that the cAMP-protein kinase A (PKA)-cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein (CREB) pathway, downstream of Ffar2, was activated, and this event led to overexpression of histone deacetylases in the Ffar2-deficient mice [23]. Mechanistically, H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 histone marks bind differentially to the promoter regions of inflammation suppressors as verified by ChIP-qPCR analysis. This results in decreased expression of these genes in the Ffar2-deficient mice, thereby promoting colon cancer [23]. We anticipate the changes of histone marks in enzymes regulating fatty acid oxidation, such as CPT2, ACADL, and HADHA, which warrants further investigations.In summary, we validated Ffar2 as a tumor suppressor Ffar2 in colon carcinogenesis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to link the biochemical metabolites and the gut microbiome profiling to the Ffar2deficiency-promoted colon cancer development (Fig. 4). Enhanced fatty acid oxidation and bile acid metabolism, as well as the altered gut microbiome, could be, at least in part, constitute, the underlying mechanisms.
Figure 4
Dysregulated free fatty acid receptor 2 exacerbates colonic adenoma formation in Apc mice by altering metabolism and gut microbiota composition.
DCA, deoxycholic acid; CDCA, chenodeoxycholic acid; ACADL, acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, long chain; ACADS, acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, C-2 to C-3 short chain; CPT2, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 2; HADHA, hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase/enoyl-CoA hydratase, alpha subunit.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
Supplementary materials can be found via https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2021.26.1.32.
Authors: Pan Pan; Chad W Skaer; Steven M Stirdivant; Matthew R Young; Gary D Stoner; John F Lechner; Yi-Wen Huang; Li-Shu Wang Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2015-06-08
Authors: Pan Pan; Chad W Skaer; Hsin-Tzu Wang; Kiyoko Oshima; Yi-Wen Huang; Jianhua Yu; Jianying Zhang; Martha M Yearsley; Kimberle A Agle; William R Drobyski; Xiao Chen; Li-Shu Wang Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2016-11-19 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: J Gregory Caporaso; Christian L Lauber; William A Walters; Donna Berg-Lyons; James Huntley; Noah Fierer; Sarah M Owens; Jason Betley; Louise Fraser; Markus Bauer; Niall Gormley; Jack A Gilbert; Geoff Smith; Rob Knight Journal: ISME J Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: S Sivaprakasam; A Gurav; A V Paschall; G L Coe; K Chaudhary; Y Cai; R Kolhe; P Martin; D Browning; L Huang; H Shi; H Sifuentes; M Vijay-Kumar; S A Thompson; D H Munn; A Mellor; T L McGaha; P Shiao; C W Cutler; K Liu; V Ganapathy; H Li; N Singh Journal: Oncogenesis Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 7.485