| Literature DB >> 33840169 |
Jain Aditya1, A S Smiline Girija1, A Paramasivam2, J Vijayashree Priyadharsini2.
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the most frequent type of head and neck cancer that usually arises from the mucosal surfaces of several organs including nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, oral cavity, tongue, pharynx, and larynx. The Wnt signaling pathway is a crucial mechanism for cellular maintenance and development. It regulates cell cycle progression, apoptosis, proliferation, migration, and differentiation. Dysregulation of this pathway correlates with oncogenesis in various tissues including breast, colon, pancreatic as well as head and neck cancers. The present study aims to assess the gene alterations in the Wnt family of genes so as to derive an association with HNSCC. Computational approaches have been utilized for the identification of gene alterations in the Wnt family of genes. Several databases such as cBioportal, STRING, and UALCAN were used for the purpose. The frequency of alteration was high in case of Wnt family member 11 (5%). Gene amplification, deep deletions, missense and truncating mutations were observed in HNSCC patients. There was a marked difference in the gene expression profile of WNT11 between grades as well as normal samples. The survival probability measured using the Kaplan-Meier curve also presented with a significant difference among male and female subjects experiencing a low/medium level expression. The female patients showed less survival probability when compared to the male subjects. This provides the prognostic significance of the WNT11 gene in HNSCC. Taken together, the present study provides clues on the possible association of WNT11 gene alterations with HNSCC, which has to be further validated using experimental approaches.Entities:
Keywords: gene amplification; genetic variants; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; in silico, Wnt pathway
Year: 2021 PMID: 33840169 PMCID: PMC8042306 DOI: 10.5808/gi.20065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genomics Inform ISSN: 1598-866X
Demographic details of patients analyzed in the present study (as obtained from the cBioportal site)
| Characteristic | No. |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Male | 386 |
| Female | 142 |
| Mutation count | 6‒3,181 |
| Diagnosis age (y) | 19-90 |
| Smoking status | |
| Smokers | 515 |
| Data not available | 12 |
| Unknown | 1 |
| Alcohol history | |
| Yes | 352 |
| No | 165 |
| Data not available | 11 |
| Neoplasm histologic grade | |
| Grade 1 | 63 |
| Grade 2 | 311 |
| Grade 3 | 125 |
| Grade 4 | 7 |
| Grade GX | 18 |
| Data not available | 4 |
| Race category | |
| White | 452 |
| African | 48 |
| Asian | 11 |
| American Indian or Alaska native | 2 |
| Data not available | 15 |
Fig. 1.(A) Oncoprint analysis depicting gene alterations in the Wnt family of genes. Each of the grey bars represent patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. (B) Frequency of gene amplification among different categories of smokers.
The list of genes, proteins encoded, genetic alterations, loci, frequency of alteration, and variant allele frequency in genes of the Wnt signaling pathway
| Gene | Protein | Alteration | Loci | % of alteration | Variant allele frequency in tumor sample | gnomAD data |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wnt family member 1 | Deep deletion | 12q13.12 | 0.6 | |||
| D49N | 0.16 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 2 | Gene amplification | 7q31.2 | 1.6 | |||
| Deep deletion | ||||||
| S158R | 0.42 | Novel | ||||
| T315P | 0.23 | Novel | ||||
| T315N | 0.57 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 2B | Deep deletion | 1p13.2 | 2 | |||
| R16L | 0.63 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 3 | Gene amplification | 17q21.31‒q21.32 | 1 | |||
| R85Q | 0.68 | rs1483494147 | ||||
| E2Q | 0.18 | Novel | ||||
| A261P | 0.46 | Novel | ||||
| G318D | 0.21 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 3A | Gene amplification | 1q42.13 | 1.2 | |||
| P283L | 0.33 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 4 | Gene amplification | 1p36.12 | 0.6 | |||
| E76Q | 0.26 | Novel | ||||
| S176Efs*12 | 0.13 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 5A | Deep deletion | 3p14.3 | 1.4 | |||
| I93V | 0.28 | rs750646727 | ||||
| G341S | 0.20 | rs1370251695 | ||||
| R215C | 0.57 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 5B | Gene amplification | 12p13.33 | 3 | |||
| Deep deletion | ||||||
| G242W | 0.36 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 6 | Deep deletion | 2q35 | 1.8 | |||
| R46W | 0.29 | rs766635655 | ||||
| T105M | 0.23 | rs759013954 | ||||
| Wnt family member 7A | Gene amplification | 3p25.1 | 0.8 | |||
| Deep deletion | ||||||
| R90C | 0.28 | rs751362548 | ||||
| Wnt family member 7B | Gene amplification | 22q13.31 | 0.8 | |||
| Q261E | 0.10 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 8A | Deep deletion | 5q31.2 | 0.6 | |||
| G12A | 0.25 | Novel | ||||
| L346V | 0.32 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 8B | Deep deletion | 10q24.31 | 1.4 | |||
| W63C | 0.36 | Novel | ||||
| R157Q | 0.34 | Novel | ||||
| A59S | 0.12 | Novel | ||||
| A94S | 0.02 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 9A | Gene amplification | 1q42.13 | 2.2 | |||
| R333Q | 0.17 | Novel | ||||
| D156N | 0.25 | Novel | ||||
| E37K | 0.41 | Novel | ||||
| V290M | 0.18 | Novel | ||||
| R61W | 0.14 | Novel | ||||
| A264V | 0.28 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 9B | Gene amplification | 17q21.32 | 0.8 | |||
| P35A | 0.20 | Novel | ||||
| Y353H | 0.15 | Novel | ||||
| L102P | 0.18 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 10A | Deep deletion | 2q35 | 1.8 | |||
| A240V | 0.16 | rs201578578 | ||||
| G88D | 0.28 | Novel | ||||
| Wnt family member 10B | Gene amplification | 12q13.12 | 0.4 | - | - | |
| Deep deletion | ||||||
| Wnt family member 11 | Gene amplification | 11q13.5 | 5 | |||
| Deep deletion | ||||||
| L65P | 0.61 | rs1173549137 | ||||
| R202H | 0.07 | rs374455490 | ||||
| Wnt family member 16 | Gene amplification | 7q31.31 | 1.6 | |||
| Deep deletion | ||||||
| E271Q | 0.20 | Novel | ||||
| S218* | 0.18 | Novel | ||||
| G304W | 0.09 | Novel |
Fig. 2.The proteins network interaction of WNT11 gene.
Expression profile of genes interacting with Wnt11 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients
| Gene | Protein | Expression profile | Expression score (p-value) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frizzled-1; receptor for Wnt proteins | Upregulated[ | 2.237 × 10-9 | |
| Frizzled-2; receptor for Wnt proteins | Upregulated[ | <10-12 | |
| Frizzled-3; receptor for Wnt proteins | Upregulated | 1.372 × 10-1 | |
| Frizzled-4; receptor for Wnt proteins | Downregulated[ | 3.639 × 10-2 | |
| Frizzled-6; receptor for Wnt proteins | Upregulated[ | 1.624 × 10-12 | |
| Frizzled-7; receptor for Wnt proteins | Upregulated[ | 8.622 × 10-2 | |
| Frizzled-8; receptor for Wnt proteins | Upregulated[ | 2.518 × 10-3 | |
| Segment polarity protein dishevelled homolog DVL-1 | Upregulated[ | 4.600 × 10-2 | |
| Segment polarity protein dishevelled homolog DVL-2 | Upregulated[ | 1.624 × 10-12 | |
| Segment polarity protein dishevelled homolog DVL-3 | Upregulated[ | <10-12 |
Differentially expressed genes with a statistically significant gene expression.
Functional enrichment of the Wnt11 interacting genes based on the KEGG pathway analysis
| KEGG pathways | Strength | False discovery rate |
|---|---|---|
| Basal cell carcinoma | 2.49 | 1.76 × 10-26 |
| Melanogenesis | 2.3 | 8.06 × 10-25 |
| Signaling pathways regulating pluripotency stem cells | 2.15 | 1.93 × 10-23 |
| Wnt signaling pathway | 2.14 | 2.11 × 10-23 |
| Gastric cancer | 2.12 | 2.26 × 10-23 |
| Breast cancer | 2.12 | 2.26 × 10-23 |
| mTOR signaling pathway | 2.12 | 2.26 × 10-23 |
| Cushing’s syndrome | 2.11 | 2.26 × 10-23 |
| Hippo signaling pathway | 2.11 | 2.26 × 10-23 |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | 2.08 | 3.38 × 10-23 |
| Notch signaling pathway | 2.05 | 3.07 × 10-6 |
| HTLV-1 infection | 1.89 | 2.96 × 10-21 |
| Proteoglycans of cancer | 1.86 | 2.27 × 10-14 |
| Human papillomavirus infection | 1.79 | 3.50 × 10-20 |
| Pathways in cancer | 1.58 | 6.22 × 10-18 |
KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin.
Fig. 3.(A) Box-Whisker plot showing relative expression profile of WNT11 gene in different grades of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The X axis denotes The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) samples and Y axis denotes the transcripts per million values. The comparison of gene expression patterns between different grades of HNSCC returned significant values between normal vs grade 2 (p = 3.8 × 10-2), normal vs. grade 4 (p = 4.3 × 10-3), grade 1 vs. grade 4 (p = 7.11 × 10-3), grade 2 vs. grade 4 (p = 2.54 × 10-11) and grade 3 vs. grade 4 (p = 1.9 × 10-3). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. (B) Box-Whisker plot showing relative expression profile of WNT11 gene in male and female HNSCC subjects. The X axis denotes the TCGA samples and Y axis denotes the transcripts per million values. The comparison of gene expression patterns between male and female viz., normal vs. male (p = 9.923 × 10-2), normal vs. female (p = 2.169 × 10-2), male vs. female (p = 2.12 × 10-1). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Fig. 4.Kaplan-Meier plots showing the association of WNT11 gene expression in combination with the sex with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patient’s survival. The x-axis represents time in days and y-axis shows the survival probability. The blue line indicates low/medium expression in male patients and the red line indicates low/medium level expression of the WNT11 gene in female patients. A significant difference in the survival probability was observed between the two groups (p = 0.021). Female subjects with a low/medium level expression presented with a low survival probability when compared to male subjects. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.