| Literature DB >> 33839813 |
Ka Hing Chu1, Erta Beqiri2,3, Marek Czosnyka2, Peter Smielewski2.
Abstract
This study compared two methods of calculating the intracranial pressure (ICP) in a patient: end-hour ICP and hour-averaged ICP. A total of 1060 patients with traumatic brain injury and a known clinical outcome were studied. For each patient, the end-hour ICP and hour-averaged ICP were calculated. The mean ICP and the ICP dose above 20 mmHg were evaluated using both calculation methods. The results for patients who survived and those who died were compared using a Student's t test. The average correlation between the end-hour and hour-averaged mean ICP was 0.747, indicating that the end-hour ICP method agrees moderately with the hour-averaged method. However, the comparison between surviving and dead patients did not present significant differences between ICP values averaged with these two different methods. The Student's t test gave similar results for both the mean ICP and ICP dose. The results suggest that the end-hour and hour-averaged methods have similar predictive power for patients' clinical outcome.Entities:
Keywords: End-hour ICP; Hour-averaged ICP; Intracranial pressure; Traumatic brain injury
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33839813 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neurochir Suppl ISSN: 0065-1419