Literature DB >> 33839813

Comparison of Two Intracranial Pressure Calculation Methods and Their Effects on the Mean Intracranial Pressure and Intracranial Pressure Dose.

Ka Hing Chu1, Erta Beqiri2,3, Marek Czosnyka2, Peter Smielewski2.   

Abstract

This study compared two methods of calculating the intracranial pressure (ICP) in a patient: end-hour ICP and hour-averaged ICP. A total of 1060 patients with traumatic brain injury and a known clinical outcome were studied. For each patient, the end-hour ICP and hour-averaged ICP were calculated. The mean ICP and the ICP dose above 20 mmHg were evaluated using both calculation methods. The results for patients who survived and those who died were compared using a Student's t test. The average correlation between the end-hour and hour-averaged mean ICP was 0.747, indicating that the end-hour ICP method agrees moderately with the hour-averaged method. However, the comparison between surviving and dead patients did not present significant differences between ICP values averaged with these two different methods. The Student's t test gave similar results for both the mean ICP and ICP dose. The results suggest that the end-hour and hour-averaged methods have similar predictive power for patients' clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  End-hour ICP; Hour-averaged ICP; Intracranial pressure; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33839813     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl        ISSN: 0065-1419


  4 in total

Review 1.  Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research.

Authors:  Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon; P David Adelson; Nada Andelic; Michael J Bell; Antonio Belli; Peter Bragge; Alexandra Brazinova; András Büki; Randall M Chesnut; Giuseppe Citerio; Mark Coburn; D Jamie Cooper; A Tamara Crowder; Endre Czeiter; Marek Czosnyka; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Jens P Dreier; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Ari Ercole; Thomas A van Essen; Valery L Feigin; Guoyi Gao; Joseph Giacino; Laura E Gonzalez-Lara; Russell L Gruen; Deepak Gupta; Jed A Hartings; Sean Hill; Ji-Yao Jiang; Naomi Ketharanathan; Erwin J O Kompanje; Linda Lanyon; Steven Laureys; Fiona Lecky; Harvey Levin; Hester F Lingsma; Marc Maegele; Marek Majdan; Geoffrey Manley; Jill Marsteller; Luciana Mascia; Charles McFadyen; Stefania Mondello; Virginia Newcombe; Aarno Palotie; Paul M Parizel; Wilco Peul; James Piercy; Suzanne Polinder; Louis Puybasset; Todd E Rasmussen; Rolf Rossaint; Peter Smielewski; Jeannette Söderberg; Simon J Stanworth; Murray B Stein; Nicole von Steinbüchel; William Stewart; Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino Stocchetti; Anneliese Synnot; Braden Te Ao; Olli Tenovuo; Alice Theadom; Dick Tibboel; Walter Videtta; Kevin K W Wang; W Huw Williams; Lindsay Wilson; Kristine Yaffe
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 44.182

2.  A Description of a New Continuous Physiological Index in Traumatic Brain Injury Using the Correlation between Pulse Amplitude of Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Joseph Donnelly; David K Menon; Peter Smielewski; Peter J A Hutchinson; Marek Czosnyka
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Relationship of "dose" of intracranial hypertension to outcome in severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Anne Vik; Torbjørn Nag; Oddrun Anita Fredriksli; Toril Skandsen; Kent Gøran Moen; Kari Schirmer-Mikalsen; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Intracranial pressure monitoring in intensive care: clinical advantages of a computerized system over manual recording.

Authors:  Elisa Roncati Zanier; Fabrizio Ortolano; Laura Ghisoni; Angelo Colombo; Sabina Losappio; Nino Stocchetti
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.