Literature DB >> 18826355

Relationship of "dose" of intracranial hypertension to outcome in severe traumatic brain injury.

Anne Vik1, Torbjørn Nag, Oddrun Anita Fredriksli, Toril Skandsen, Kent Gøran Moen, Kari Schirmer-Mikalsen, Geoffrey T Manley.   

Abstract

OBJECT: It has recently been suggested that the degree of intracranial pressure (ICP) above the treatment goal can be estimated by the area under the curve (AUC) of ICP versus time in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this study was to determine whether the calculated "ICP dose"-the ICP AUC-is related to mortality rate, outcome, and Marshall CT classification.
METHODS: Of 135 patients (age range 1-82 years) with severe TBI treated during a 5-year period at the authors' institution, 113 patients underwent ICP monitoring (84%). Ninety-three patients with a monitoring time>24 hours were included for analysis of ICP AUC calculated using the trapezoidal method. Computed tomography scans were assessed according to the Marshall TBI classification. Patients with Glasgow Outcome Scale scores at 6 months and >3 years were separated into 2 groups based on outcome.
RESULTS: Sixty patients (65%) had ICP values>20 mm Hg, and 12 (13%) developed severe intracranial hypertension and died secondary to herniation. A multiple regression analysis adjusting for Glasgow Coma Scale score, age, pupillary abnormalities and Injury Severity Scale score demonstrated that the ICP AUC was a significant predictor of poor outcome at 6 months (p=0.034) and of death (p=0.035). However, it did not predict long-term outcome (p=0.157). The ICP AUC was significantly higher in patients with Marshall head injury Categories 3 and 4 (24 patients) than in those with Category 2 (23 patients, p=0.025) and Category 5 (46 patients, p=0.021) TBIs using the worst CT scan obtained.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors found a significant relationship between the dose of ICP, the worst Marshall CT score, and patient outcome, suggesting that the AUC method may be useful in refining and improving the treatment of ICP in patients with TBI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18826355     DOI: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/10/0678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  57 in total

1.  Plateau waves in head injured patients requiring neurocritical care.

Authors:  Gianluca Castellani; Christian Zweifel; Dong-Joo Kim; Emmanuel Carrera; Danila K Radolovich; Piotr Smielewski; Peter J Hutchinson; John D Pickard; Marek Czosnyka
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Intracranial pressure and its surrogates.

Authors:  Anthony R Frattalone; Robert D Stevens
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Data collection and interpretation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Citerio; Soojin Park; J Michael Schmidt; Richard Moberg; Jose I Suarez; Peter D Le Roux
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Visualizing secondary brain insults: does the emperor have new clothes?

Authors:  Karim Asehnoune; J Claude Hemphill; Rachel S Agbeko
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  A Precision Medicine Approach to Cerebral Edema and Intracranial Hypertension after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Quo Vadis?

Authors:  Ruchira M Jha; Patrick M Kochanek
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.081

6.  Intracranial pressure thresholds in severe traumatic brain injury: Con : The injured brain is not aware of ICP thresholds!

Authors:  Raimund Helbok; G Meyfroidt; R Beer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Intracranial pressure thresholds in severe traumatic brain injury: Pro.

Authors:  John A Myburgh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  A Method of Managing Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Absence of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: The Imaging and Clinical Examination Protocol.

Authors:  Randall M Chesnut; Nancy Temkin; Sureyya Dikmen; Carlos Rondina; Walter Videtta; Gustavo Petroni; Silvia Lujan; Victor Alanis; Antonio Falcao; Gustavo de la Fuenta; Luis Gonzalez; Manuel Jibaja; Arturo Lavarden; Freddy Sandi; Roberto Mérida; Ricardo Romero; Jim Pridgeon; Jason Barber; Joan Machamer; Kelley Chaddock
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Therapeutic targeting of astrocytes after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jessica Shields; Donald E Kimbler; Walid Radwan; Nathan Yanasak; Sangeetha Sukumari-Ramesh; Krishnan M Dhandapani
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 10.  Physiological monitoring of the severe traumatic brain injury patient in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Peter Le Roux
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.