Literature DB >> 29212405

A Description of a New Continuous Physiological Index in Traumatic Brain Injury Using the Correlation between Pulse Amplitude of Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure.

Frederick A Zeiler1,2,3,4, Joseph Donnelly4, David K Menon1, Peter Smielewski4, Peter J A Hutchinson5, Marek Czosnyka4,6.   

Abstract

To describe a new continuous index of physiologic measurement in a traumatic brain injury (TBI) population, the moving correlation coefficient between intracranial pressure (ICP) pulse amplitude (AMP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), which we refer to as RAC. We use patient examples of sustained intracranial hypertension, systemic arterial hypotension, and plateau waves, as well as the retrospective analysis of 358 non-decompressive craniectomy (DC) TBI patients with high-frequency ICP and arterial blood pressure data, to explore the relationships of this new index, RAC, with AMP, ICP, CPP, RAP (correlation coefficient between AMP and ICP), pressure reactivity index (PRx), and pulse amplitude index (PAx). We compared the RAC-CPP relationship to that observed between CPP and both PRx and PAx. RAC displays temporal responsiveness to sustained increased ICP, arterial hypotension, and plateau waves, with positive values found during episodes of high ICP and low CPP. Analysis of AMP versus CPP and AMP versus ICP relationships in data from the entire non-DC cohort show lower breakpoints for AMP/CPP at CPP = 40 mm Hg and upper breakpoints for AMP/ICP at ICP = 50-60 mm Hg. RAC trends to positive values with increasing ICP, particularly with ICP values above the peak in AMP (ICP >50 mm Hg), though its interpretation requires concomitant interpretation of AMP, RAP, and PRx/PAx to determine contributions of compensatory reserve and cerebrovascular responsiveness to the changes observed in RAC. There is a parabolic relationship between RAC versus CPP, with trends toward positive RAC values near (and beyond) limits for low and high CPPs, suggesting that RAC may be used in the determination of optimum CPP. RAC appears to carry information regarding both cerebrovascular responsiveness and cerebral compensatory reserve. This contributes to RAC's uniqueness and complex interpretation. Further prospective, clinical studies of RAC in CPP optimum estimation and outcome prediction in TBI are required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICP index; RAC; cerebral compliance; cerebrovascular reactivity

Year:  2018        PMID: 29212405     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  19 in total

1.  Association between Cerebrovascular Reactivity Monitoring and Mortality Is Preserved When Adjusting for Baseline Admission Characteristics in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Study.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Ari Ercole; Erta Beqiri; Manuel Cabeleira; Eric P Thelin; Nino Stocchetti; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Diffuse Intracranial Injury Patterns Are Associated with Impaired Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Validation Study.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; François Mathieu; Miguel Monteiro; Ben Glocker; Ari Ercole; Erta Beqiri; Manuel Cabeleira; Nino Stocchetti; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Virginia Newcombe; David K Menon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Advanced Bio-signal Analytics for Continuous Bedside Monitoring of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Future.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  A Precision Medicine Approach to Cerebral Edema and Intracranial Hypertension after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Quo Vadis?

Authors:  Ruchira M Jha; Patrick M Kochanek
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Relationship between Measures of Cerebrovascular Reactivity and Intracranial Lesion Progression in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A CENTER-TBI Study.

Authors:  François Mathieu; Frederick A Zeiler; Ari Ercole; Miguel Monteiro; Konstantinos Kamnitsas; Ben Glocker; Daniel P Whitehouse; Tilak Das; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Peter J Hutchinson; Virginia F J Newcombe; David K Menon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Paths to Successful Translation of New Therapies for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Golden Age of Traumatic Brain Injury Research: A Pittsburgh Vision.

Authors:  Patrick M Kochanek; Travis C Jackson; Ruchira M Jha; Robert S B Clark; David O Okonkwo; Hülya Bayır; Samuel M Poloyac; Amy K Wagner; Philip E Empey; Yvette P Conley; Michael J Bell; Anthony E Kline; Corina O Bondi; Dennis W Simon; Shaun W Carlson; Ava M Puccio; Christopher M Horvat; Alicia K Au; Jonathan Elmer; Amery Treble-Barna; Milos D Ikonomovic; Lori A Shutter; D Lansing Taylor; Andrew M Stern; Steven H Graham; Valerian E Kagan; Edwin K Jackson; Stephen R Wisniewski; C Edward Dixon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 7.  The Limited Impact of Current Therapeutic Interventions on Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Overview.

Authors:  Logan Froese; Carleen Batson; Alwyn Gomez; Josh Dian; Frederick A Zeiler
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Multimodal Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation and Autonomic Function After Pediatric Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation Rupture.

Authors:  Brian Appavu; Stephen Foldes; Brian T Burrows; Austin Jacobson; Todd Abruzzo; Varina Boerwinkle; Anthony Willyerd; Tara Mangum; Vishal Gunnala; Iris Marku; P D Adelson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 9.  Pathophysiology and treatment of cerebral edema in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ruchira M Jha; Patrick M Kochanek; J Marc Simard
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 10.  Neurotrauma as a big-data problem.

Authors:  J Russell Huie; Carlos A Almeida; Adam R Ferguson
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.