| Literature DB >> 33836808 |
Wan-Ru Wang1, Nai-Tzu Chen2, Nai-Yun Hsu1, I-Ying Kuo3, Hsin-Wen Chang1, Jiu-Yao Wang4, Huey-Jen Su5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) expressions is linked to asthma and allergic disease. Exposure to phthalate esters, a widely used plasticizer, is associated with respiratory and allergic morbidity. Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) causes TSLP upregulation in the skin. In addition, phthalate exposure is associated with changes in environmentally induced DNA methylation, which might cause phenotypic heterogeneity. This study examined the DNA methylation of the TSLP gene to determine the potential mechanism between phthalate exposure and allergic diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Allergic disease; DNA methylation; Phthalate; TSLP
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33836808 PMCID: PMC8035749 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-021-01061-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Epigenetics ISSN: 1868-7075 Impact factor: 6.551
Descriptive characteristics of subjects
| % | ||
|---|---|---|
| Age (Mean ± SD) | 7.05 ± 1.19 | |
| BMI (Mean ± SD) | 16.26 ± 2.08 | |
| Female | 34 | 37.8 |
| Male | 56 | 62.2 |
| With breastfeed | 52 | 57.8 |
| Yes | 11 | 12.2 |
| No | 79 | 87.8 |
| Mother | 49 | 44.4 |
| Father | 52 | 57.8 |
| Mother | 17 | 18.9 |
| Father | 50 | 55.6 |
| Mother | 26 | 28.9 |
| Father | 29 | 32.2 |
| Yes | 52 | 57.8 |
| No | 38 | 42.2 |
| Respiratory symptoms | ||
| During sleeping | 16 | 17.8 |
| While getting up | 37 | 41.1 |
| During daytime | 25 | 27.8 |
| Eye‐related symptoms | 24 | 26.7 |
Concentration of PAEs, DNA methylation, and RNA levels
| Positive detection* | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Median (range) | |||
| DMP | 87 | 11 | 2.43 (1.98–18.87) |
| DEP | 87 | 16 | 3.08 (2.12–8.93) |
| DBP | 78 | 78 | 18.61 (5.26–159.75) |
| BBzP | 84 | 55 | 6.11 (1.94–48.53) |
| DEHP | 85 | 85 | 909.03 (78.98–2769.2) |
| MMP | 90 | 90 | 6.64 (1.11–188.64) |
| MEP | 90 | 90 | 15.60 (2.29–540.08) |
| MBP | 90 | 90 | 52.76 (17.28–445.56) |
| MBzP | 90 | 90 | 5.31 (0.97–217.16) |
| MEHP | 90 | 90 | 10.11 (1.79–361.44) |
| MEHHP | 90 | 90 | 45.12 (10.17–2276.0) |
| MEOHP | 90 | 90 | 42.62 (10.21–1769.9) |
| IL-4 | 90 | 11 | 1.77 (1.14–12.44) |
| IL-5 | 90 | 47 | 1.51 (1.03–3.88) |
| IL-6 | 90 | 20 | 1.78 (1.15–9.78) |
| IL-8 | 90 | 81 | 2.12 (1.10–7.90) |
| IL-12 | 90 | 12 | 1.51 (1.11–8.52) |
| IL-13 | 90 | 16 | 1.92 (1.16–11.09) |
| IFN-r | 90 | 44 | 1.56 (1.02–24.99) |
| TNF-α | 90 | 39 | 1.72 (1.12–4.01) |
| Position − 775 | 90 | 90 | 17 (7–27) |
| 90 | 18 | 9.71 (0.08–1931.49) | |
*Samples with levels within the concentration range of calibration curve
ΔThe number of samples with quantifiable concentrations (i.e., within the calibration range)
#The parental compounds of phthalates were analysis from settle dust samples
¥The metabolism of phthalates were analysis from urine samples
†Cytokine were analysis from serum samples
¶Percent of reference/housekeeping genes (Actin Beta (ACTB))
Fig. 1The correlation between parental compounds of phthalate in the settle dust and TSLP DNA methylation level in buffy coat. *p < 0.05, by Spearman correlation coefficient
Fig. 2The correlation between phthalate metabolites in the urine and TSLP methylation levels in buffy coat. *p < 0.05, by Spearman correlation coefficient
The association of Phthalate exposure and TSLP methylation level
| 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude model | |||
| BBzP in settled dust§ | 55 | − 1.49 (0.76) | − 2.989, − 0.004 |
| MEP in urine§ | 90 | 0.98 (0.31)* | 0.376, 1.59 |
| Final model b | |||
| BBzP in settled dust§ | 55 | − 1.75 (0.72)* | − 3.162, − 0.337 |
| MEP in urine§ | 81 | 0.97 (0.35)* | 0.274, 1.657 |
aGeneralized linear model, *p < 0.05
bThe model was adjusted for gender, age, BMI, PM2.5, formaldehyde, temperature and relative humidity, parents smoking status, allergic history, and education levels
Fig. 3The difference between TSLP methylation level and presences of symptoms. *p < 0.05, by Mann–Whitney U test
Effects of TSLP methylation level on respiratory symptoms
| ORa (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude model | 54 | 0.83 (0.71–0.97) | 0.021* |
| Final modelb | 52 | 0.80 (0.65–0.99) | 0.036* |
aLogistic regression, *p < 0.05
bThe model was adjusted for gender, age, BMI, PM2.5, formaldehyde, temperature and relative humidity, parents smoking status, allergic history and education levels