Literature DB >> 23333758

Identifying sources of phthalate exposure with human biomonitoring: results of a 48h fasting study with urine collection and personal activity patterns.

Holger M Koch1, Matthew Lorber, Krista L Y Christensen, Claudia Pälmke, Stephan Koslitz, Thomas Brüning.   

Abstract

Human biomonitoring studies measuring phthalate metabolites in urine have shown widespread exposure to phthalates in the general population. Diet is thought to be a principle route of exposure to many phthalates. Therefore, we studied urinary phthalate metabolite patterns over a period of strict fasting and additionally recorded personal activity patterns with a diary to investigate non-dietary routes of exposure. Five individuals (3 female, 2 male, 27-47 years of age) fasted on glass-bottled water only over a 48-h period. All urine void events were captured in full, and measured for metabolites of the high molecular weight (HMW) di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), di-isononyl phthalate (DINP) and di-isodecyl phthalate (DiDP), and the low molecular weight (LMW) di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP), di-iso-butyl phthalate (DiBP), butylbenzyl phthalate (BBzP), dimethyl phthalate (DMP), and diethyl phthalate (DEP). In all, 21 metabolites were measured in a total of 118 urine events, including events before and after the fasting period. At the onset of the study all phthalate metabolite concentrations were consistent with levels found in previous general population studies. Metabolites of the HMW phthalates (DEHP, DiNP and DiDP) showed a rapid decline to levels 5-10 times lower than initial levels within 24h of the fast and remained low thereafter. After food consumption resumed, levels rose again. By contrast, metabolites of the LMW phthalates including DMP, DEP, BBzP, DnBP and DiBP showed a cyclical pattern of rising and declining concentrations suggestive of ongoing non-food exposures. Furthermore, metabolites of most of the LMW phthalates (BBzP, DnBP and DiBP) tracked each other remarkably well, suggesting concurrent exposures. Diary entries could not help explain exposure sources for these phthalates, with one exception: rises in MEP concentrations around males' showers suggest personal care products as a major source of DEP. Exposure to HMW phthalates in this cohort appears to be driven by dietary intake, while non-dietary routes such as use of personal care products and ubiquitous sources including dust and indoor air appear to explain exposure to LMW phthalates.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomonitoring; Dietary and non-dietary exposure; Phthalates; Sources; Urinary metabolites

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23333758     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  72 in total

Review 1.  Organ-on-a-chip for assessing environmental toxicants.

Authors:  Soohee Cho; Jeong-Yeol Yoon
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 2.  Exposure assessment issues in epidemiology studies of phthalates.

Authors:  Lauren E Johns; Glinda S Cooper; Audrey Galizia; John D Meeker
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations in relation to history of infertility and use of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Snigdha Alur; Hongyue Wang; Kathy Hoeger; Shanna H Swan; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Bruce J Redmon; Ruby Nguyen; Emily S Barrett
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Relying on biomarkers for intake assessment in nutrition.

Authors:  Lars Ove Dragsted
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Association of prenatal urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and childhood BMI and obesity.

Authors:  Kim G Harley; Kimberly Berger; Stephen Rauch; Katherine Kogut; Birgit Claus Henn; Antonia M Calafat; Karen Huen; Brenda Eskenazi; Nina Holland
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.756

6.  Association of Exposure to Di-2-Ethylhexylphthalate Replacements With Increased Insulin Resistance in Adolescents From NHANES 2009-2012.

Authors:  Teresa M Attina; Leonardo Trasande
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Temporal variability of urinary di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate metabolites during a dietary intervention study.

Authors:  Janet M Ackerman; Robin E Dodson; Connie L Engel; Janet M Gray; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Associations of urinary phthalate and phenol biomarkers with menarche in a multiethnic cohort of young girls.

Authors:  Mary S Wolff; Ashley Pajak; Susan M Pinney; Gayle C Windham; Maida Galvez; Michael Rybak; Manori J Silva; Xiaoyun Ye; Antonia M Calafat; Lawrence H Kushi; Frank M Biro; Susan L Teitelbaum
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 3.143

9.  Exposure to select phthalates and phenols through use of personal care products among Californian adults and their children.

Authors:  Claire Philippat; Deborah Bennett; Antonia M Calafat; Irva Hertz Picciotto
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Predictors and long-term reproducibility of urinary phthalate metabolites in middle-aged men and women living in urban Shanghai.

Authors:  Anne P Starling; Lawrence S Engel; Antonia M Calafat; Stella Koutros; Jaya M Satagopan; Gong Yang; Charles E Matthews; Qiuyin Cai; Jessie P Buckley; Bu-Tian Ji; Hui Cai; Wong-Ho Chow; Wei Zheng; Yu-Tang Gao; Nathaniel Rothman; Yong-Bing Xiang; Xiao-Ou Shu
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 9.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.