| Literature DB >> 33836788 |
Xiaojie Liu1,2,3, Jingwan Wang1,2,3, Xiao Fu1,2,3, Jing Li1,2,3, Meng Zhang1,2,3, Junhao Yan2,3, Shanshan Gao4,5, Jinlong Ma6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thin endometrial thickness (EMT) has been suggested to be associated with reduced incidence of pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment, but the effect of thin endometrium on obstetric outcome is less investigated. This study aims to determine whether EMT affects the incidence of obstetric complications in fresh IVF/ICSI-embryo transfer (ET) cycles.Entities:
Keywords: Endometrial thickness; Fresh IVF/ICSI embryo transfer; Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; Obstetric complication; Perinatal outcome
Year: 2021 PMID: 33836788 PMCID: PMC8034143 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00738-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Demographic and main treatment characteristics for women with singleton live births according to endometrial thickness
| Characteristics | EMT ≤ 8 mm | 8 < EMT ≤ 12 mm | EMT > 12 mm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| Age (y)abc | 32.39 ± 4.43 | 30.91 ± 4.30 | 30.46 ± 4.33 | < 0.001e |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.55 ± 3.36 | 23.50 ± 3.55 | 23.69 ± 3.65 | NSe |
| Parity, n (%) ab | < 0.001f | |||
| First | 362 (66.5) | 4800 (77.0) | 1912 (76.8) | |
| High order | 182 (33.5) | 1434 (23.0) | 576 (23.2) | |
| Primary infertility, n (%) abc | 167 (30.7) | 2982 (47.8) | 1340 (53.9) | < 0.001f |
| Cause of infertility, n (%) abc | < 0.001f | |||
| Oviduct factors | 241 (44.3) | 1844 (29.6) | 668 (26.8) | |
| Male factor | 128 (23.5) | 1749 (28.1) | 745 (29.9) | |
| Ovulation problems | 20 (3.7) | 321 (5.1) | 120 (4.8) | |
| Multiple causes | 43 (7.9) | 896 (14.4) | 364 (14.6) | |
| Unexplained | 67 (12.3) | 872 (14.0) | 351 (14.1) | |
| Other | 45 (8.3) | 552 (8.9) | 240 (9.6) | |
| Type of ART treatment, n (%) | NSf | |||
| IVF | 396 (72.8) | 4476 (71.9) | 1755 (70.5) | |
| ICSI | 148 (27.2) | 1758 (28.2) | 733 (29.5) | |
| Ovarian stimulation protocol, n (%) c | < 0.001f | |||
| GnRH antagonist protocol | 102 (18.8) | 1153 (18.5) | 405 (16.3) | |
| GnRH agonist long protocol | 202 (37.1) | 3183 (51.1) | 1519 (61.1) | |
| GnRH agonist short protocol | 187 (34.4) | 1580 (25.3) | 444 (17.8) | |
| GnRH agonist super long protocol | 37 (6.8) | 275 (4.4) | 112 (4.5) | |
| Other protocol | 16 (2.9) | 43 (0.7) | 8 (0.3) | |
| EMT on HCG trigger day, (mm)abc | 7.57 ± 0.71 | 10.52 ± 1.06 | 13.38 ± 1.11 | < 0.001d |
| Progesterone level on HCG trigger day (ng/mL) ac | 0.77 ± 0.37 | 0.82 ± 0.35 | 0.80 ± 0.34 | 0.001e |
| E2 level on HCG trigger day (pg/mL) | 2856.69 ± 1442.43 | 2878.68 ± 1431.83 | 2952.69 ± 1455.60 | NSe |
| Number of embryos transferred, n (%) ab | 0.002f | |||
| 1 | 210 (38.6) | 1952 (31.3) | 782 (31.4) | |
| 2 | 334 (61.4) | 4282 (68.7) | 1706 (68.6) | |
| Blastocyst transfer, n (%) | 165 (30.3) | 1603 (25.7) | 632 (25.4) | 0.05f |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or n (%). ANOVA analysis of variance, BMI body mass index, EMT endometrial thickness, HCG human chorionic gonadotropin, E estradiol, NS not statistically significant
aStatistically significant differences between EMT ≤8 and 8 < EMT ≤12 mm groups
bStatistically significant differences between EMT ≤8 mm and EMT > 12 mm groups
cStatistically significant differences between 8 < EMT ≤12 mm and EMT > 12 mm groups
dWelch’s ANOVA
eOne-way ANOVA
fPearson chi-square test
Obstetric complications for women with singleton live births according to endometrial thickness
| Outcomes | EMT ≤ 8 mm | 8 < EMT ≤ 12 mm | EMT > 12 mm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| HDP, n (%) ab | 37 (6.8) | 224 (3.6) | 88 (3.5) | 0.001c |
| GDM, n (%) | 52 (9.6) | 469 (7.5) | 187 (7.5) | 0.224 c |
| Placental abruption, n (%) | 4 (0.7) | 15 (0.2) | 11 (0.4) | 0.054 d |
| Placenta previa, n (%) | 10 (1.8) | 81 (1.3) | 43 (1.7) | 0.232 c |
| PPH, n (%) | 2 (0.4) | 19 (0.3) | 7 (0.3) | 0.894 d |
| Cesarean section, n (%) | 346 (63.6) | 3862 (62.0) | 1526 (61.3) | 0.604 d |
HDP hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; HDP include gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia, GDM gestational diabetes mellitus, PPH postpartum hemorrhage
aStatistically significant differences between EMT ≤8 mm and 8 mm < EMT ≤12 mm groups
bStatistically significant differences between EMT ≤8 mm and EMT > 12 mm groups
cPearson chi-square test
dFisher’s exact test
Univariate and multivariate analysis of predictor variables for HDP
| Predictor variable | OR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMT on HCG trigger day (mm) | ||||
| ≤ 8 | 1.958 (1.367–2.805) | < 0.001a | 1.853 (1.281–2.679) | 0.001a |
| > 8–12 | 1 | 1 | ||
| > 12 | 0.984 (0.765–1.265) | 0.898 | 1.000 (0.775–1.291) | 0.999 |
| Parity | ||||
| First | 1 | 1 | ||
| High order | 1.007 (0.783–1.295) | 0.955 | 0.774 (0.550–1.088) | 0.141 |
| ART treatment typy | ||||
| IVF | 1 | 1 | ||
| ICSI | 0.923 (0.725–1.174) | 0.514 | 0.961 (0.751–1.229) | 0.751 |
| Ovarian stimulation protocol | ||||
| GnRH antagonist protocol | 1 | 1 | ||
| GnRH agonist long protocol | 1.004 (0.740–1.362) | 0.981 | 1.071 (0.784–1.463) | 0.667 |
| GnRH agonist short protocol | 1.346 (0.967–1.875) | 0.078 | 1.205 (0.848–1.712) | 0.298 |
| GnRH agonist super long protocol | 1.319 (0.776–2.243) | 0.306 | 1.184 (0.688–2.037) | 0.542 |
| Other protocol | 1.318 (0.402–4.323) | 0.648 | 0.878 (0.259–2.969) | 0.834 |
| Type of infertility | ||||
| Primary | 1 | 1 | ||
| Secondary | 1.155 (0.932–1.433) | 0.188 | 1.034 (0.798–1.340) | 0.799 |
| Number of embryos transferred | ||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 0.828 (0.663–1.036) | 0.099 | 0.738 (0.503–1.084) | 0.121 |
| Stage of embryo transferred | ||||
| Cleavage-stage transfer | 1 | 1 | ||
| Blastocyst transfer | 1.089 (0.857–1.384) | 0.485 | 0.938 (0.762–1.154) | 0.542 |
| Previous cesarean section | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 0.577 (0.357–0.933) | 0.025a | 0.471 (0.275–0.804) | 0.006a |
| Endometriosis | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 0.218 (0.030–1.565) | 0.13 | 0.213 (0.029–1.545) | 0.126 |
| PCOS | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 1.195 (0.886–1.611) | 0.243 | 1.031 (0.749–1.419) | 0.853 |
ART assisted reproductive technology, IVF in vitro fertilization, ICSI intracytoplasmic sperm injection, EMT endometrial thickness, HCG human chorionic gonadotropin, GDM gestational diabetes mellitus, GnRH gonadotropin-releasing hormone, PCOS polycystic ovary syndrome, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, aOR adjusted odds ratio
For variables of age, BMI, estradiol and progesterone level on HCG administration day, restricted cubic splines were generated to adjust for the non-linear relationship between these continuous variables and HDP. Thus, quantitative results were not presented
a P < 0.05