Literature DB >> 29202976

Perinatal outcomes after natural conception versus in vitro fertilization (IVF) in gestational surrogates: a model to evaluate IVF treatment versus maternal effects.

Irene Woo1, Rita Hindoyan2, Melanie Landay2, Jacqueline Ho2, Sue Ann Ingles3, Lynda K McGinnis2, Richard J Paulson2, Karine Chung2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the perinatal outcomes between singleton live births achieved with the use of commissioned versus spontaneously conceived embryos carried by the same gestational surrogate.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic in vitro fertilization center. PATIENT(S): Gestational surrogate. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy outcome, gestational age at birth, birth weight, perinatal complications. RESULT(S): We identified 124 gestational surrogates who achieved a total of 494 pregnancies. Pregnancy outcomes for surrogate and spontaneous pregnancies were significantly different (P<.001), with surrogate pregnancies more likely to result in twin pregnancies: 33% vs. 1%. Miscarriage and ectopic rates were similar. Of these pregnancies, there were 352 singleton live births: 103 achieved from commissioned embryos and 249 conceived spontaneously. Surrogate births had lower mean gestational age at delivery (38.8 ± 2.1 vs. 39.7 ± 1.4), higher rates of preterm birth (10.7% vs. 3.1%), and higher rates of low birth weight (7.8% vs. 2.4%). Neonates from surrogacy had birth weights that were, on average, 105 g lower. Surrogate births had significantly higher obstetrical complications, including gestational diabetes, hypertension, use of amniocentesis, placenta previa, antibiotic requirement during labor, and cesarean section. CONCLUSION(S): Neonates born from commissioned embryos and carried by gestational surrogates have increased adverse perinatal outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight, hypertension, maternal gestational diabetes, and placenta previa, compared with singletons conceived spontaneously and carried by the same woman. Our data suggest that assisted reproductive procedures may potentially affect embryo quality and that its negative impact can not be overcome even with a proven healthy uterine environment.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; embryo culture; gestational carrier; gestational surrogacy; in vitro fertilization; perinatal outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29202976     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

Review 1.  ASAS-SSR Triennnial Reproduction Symposium: Looking Back and Moving Forward-How Reproductive Physiology has Evolved: Fetal origins of impaired muscle growth and metabolic dysfunction: Lessons from the heat-stressed pregnant ewe.

Authors:  Dustin T Yates; Jessica L Petersen; Ty B Schmidt; Caitlin N Cadaret; Taylor L Barnes; Robert J Posont; Kristin A Beede
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Is vanishing twin syndrome associated with adverse obstetric outcomes of ART singletons? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Xin Li; Tian-Ze Sun; Mo-Qi Lv; Liang Zhou; Pan Ge; Hao-Nan Li; Dang-Xia Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Comparison of perinatal outcomes between spontaneous vs. commissioned cycles in gestational carriers for single and same-sex male intended parents.

Authors:  Z Pavlovic; K C Hammer; M Raff; P Patel; K N Kunze; B Kaplan; C Coughlin; J Hirshfeld-Cytron
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Obstetric Complications of Donor Egg Conception Pregnancies.

Authors:  Amit Shah; Maryam Parisaei; Jessica Garner
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-04-10

5.  Examining pre-term birth and cesarean section rates in gestational carrier pregnancies.

Authors:  Meghan B Smith; Rachel S Mandelbaum; Lynda K McGinnis; Richard J Paulson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Perinatal complications and live-birth outcomes following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ling-Ling Lei; Yong-Lian Lan; Shu-Yu Wang; Wei Feng; Zhi-Jin Zhai
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from assisted reproduction technology in SARS-CoV-2-infected women: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Virginia Engels Calvo; Sara Cruz Melguizo; Alejandra Abascal-Saiz; Laura Forcén Acebal; Amalia Sánchez-Migallón; Pilar Pintado Recarte; Celia Cuenca Marín; Beatriz Marcos Puig; Pablo G Del Barrio Fernández; Olga Nieto Velasco; María Luisa de la Cruz Conty; Oscar Martínez-Perez
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 7.490

8.  A survey of public attitudes towards third-party reproduction in Japan in 2014.

Authors:  Naoko Yamamoto; Tetsuya Hirata; Gentaro Izumi; Akari Nakazawa; Shinya Fukuda; Kazuaki Neriishi; Tomoko Arakawa; Masashi Takamura; Miyuki Harada; Yasushi Hirota; Kaori Koga; Osamu Wada-Hiraike; Tomoyuki Fujii; Minoru Irahara; Yutaka Osuga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Healthy Singleton Pregnancies From Restorative Reproductive Medicine (RRM) After Failed IVF.

Authors:  Phil C Boyle; Theun de Groot; Karolina M Andralojc; Tracey A Parnell
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-07-31

10.  Surrogacy, an Excellent Opportunity for Women with More Threats.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Sadeghi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.