Literature DB >> 3383480

CT evaluation of coverage and congruency of the hip prior to osteotomy.

K Klaue1, A Wallin, R Ganz.   

Abstract

A computer-assisted model has been developed to improve the results of surgical techniques for reconstruction of hip dysplasia. This method assesses the coverage and congruency of the femoral head by evaluating multiple factors that may influence surgical planning. It achieves a more reliable image because the measurements are based on a three-dimensional representation, and attention is focused on the cartilaginous coverage of the femoral head. A method to simulate the operative correction helps the surgeon in planning osteotomies of the femur and pelvis. This technique clearly establishes both deficiencies of coverage and congruency of pathologic hips and thus may be used to create a more precise definition and treatment of multiple congenital abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3383480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  36 in total

1.  Analysis of acetabular version in the native hip: comparison between 2D axial CT and 3D CT measurements.

Authors:  Wael Dandachli; Saif Ul Islam; Richard Tippett; Margaret A Hall-Craggs; Johan D Witt
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Outcome of periacetabular osteotomy: joint contact pressure calculation using standing AP radiographs, 12 patients followed for average 2 years.

Authors:  Mehran Armand; Jyri Lepistö; Kaj Tallroth; John Elias; Edmund Chao
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Is Increased Acetabular Cartilage or Fossa Size Associated With Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement?

Authors:  Stephanie Y Pun; Andreas Hingsammer; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Evaluation of a computerized measurement technique for joint alignment before and during periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Robert S Armiger; Mehran Armand; Jyri Lepisto; Davneet Minhas; Kaj Tallroth; Simon C Mears; Matthew D Waites; Russell H Taylor
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2007-07

5.  Acetabular coverage differs between standing and supine positions: model-based assessment of low-dose biplanar radiographs and comparison with CT.

Authors:  Benjamin Fritz; Christoph A Agten; Franca K Boldt; Patrick O Zingg; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Reto Sutter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  CORR Insights®: Operative Fluoroscopic Correction Is Reliable and Correlates With Postoperative Radiographic Correction in Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  New radiographic index for evaluating acetabular version.

Authors:  Hiroshi Koyama; Hironobu Hoshino; Daisuke Suzuki; Shoichi Nishikino; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  CT false-profile view of the hip: a reproducible method of measuring anterior acetabular coverage using volume CT data.

Authors:  Steven D Needell; Ross M Borzykowski; Dominic S Carreira; John Kozy
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Pelvic positioning creates error in CT acetabular measurements.

Authors:  Harold J P van Bosse; Duron Lee; Eric R Henderson; Debra A Sala; David S Feldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Radiographic measurements of hip dysplasia at skeletal maturity--new reference intervals based on 2,038 19-year-old Norwegians.

Authors:  Lene Bjerke Laborie; Ingvild Øvstebø Engesæter; Trude Gundersen Lehmann; Francesco Sera; Carol Dezateux; Lars Birger Engesæter; Karen Rosendahl
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.