Literature DB >> 3383336

Estimates of the proportion of lung cancer attributable to occupational exposure.

L Simonato1, P Vineis, A C Fletcher.   

Abstract

The proportion of lung cancer due to occupational exposure has been estimated by computing the attributable risk in the population (ARp) from various case-control studies. Different criteria have been used in including occupational exposures from published studies: (i) exposure to lung carcinogens according to a job-exposure matrix approach; (ii) occupations in which an increased risk of lung cancer has been established; (iii) occupations in which an increased risk of lung cancer has been suggested; and (iv) occupations associated with a statistically significant increase of lung cancer. Only studies in which the confounding effect of smoking was controlled for have been included. We found a wide variability of ARp estimates, mainly due to the different geographical locations of the studies, while they seem to be only moderately affected by the different criteria of inclusion of the relevant occupational exposures. Studies using job-exposure matrices gave ARps ranging from 0.6% to 35%. When a list of recognized carcinogenic exposures was used for the selection of the relevant occupations, the estimates varied between 2.4% and 40%. From the studies reviewed it also appears that tobacco smoking has a very limited confounding effect. Various limitations of the exercise are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3383336     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/9.7.1159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  11 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status and lung cancer incidence in men in The Netherlands: is there a role for occupational exposure?

Authors:  A J van Loon; R A Goldbohm; I J Kant; G M Swaen; A M Kremer; P A van den Brandt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Contribution of occupational exposure to cancer: recent developments.

Authors:  M J Gardner
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1991-04

3.  Occupational exposure to carcinogens and risk of lung cancer: results from The Netherlands cohort study.

Authors:  A J van Loon; I J Kant; G M Swaen; R A Goldbohm; A M Kremer; P A van den Brandt
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Occupational exposure and lung cancer risk in a coastal area of northeastern Italy.

Authors:  M Bovenzi; G Stanta; G Antiga; P Peruzzo; F Cavallieri
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Effect of occupational air pollutants on various histological types of lung cancer: a population based case-control study.

Authors:  H Becher; W Jedrychowski; J Wahrendorf; Z Basa-Cierpialek; E Flak; K Gomola
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1993-02

6.  A case-control study of lung cancer with special reference to the effect of air pollution in Poland.

Authors:  W Jedrychowski; H Becher; J Wahrendorf; Z Basa-Cierpialek
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 7.  Asbestos and cancer: An overview of current trends in Europe.

Authors:  M Albin; C Magnani; S Krstev; E Rapiti; I Shefer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Epidemiology, public health, and the rhetoric of false positives.

Authors:  Aaron Blair; Rodolfo Saracci; Paolo Vineis; Pierluigi Cocco; Francesco Forastiere; Philippe Grandjean; Manolis Kogevinas; David Kriebel; Anthony McMichael; Neil Pearce; Miquel Porta; Jonathan Samet; Dale P Sandler; Adele Seniori Costantini; Harri Vainio
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Lung cancer and occupation in a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Dario Consonni; Sara De Matteis; Jay H Lubin; Sholom Wacholder; Margaret Tucker; Angela Cecilia Pesatori; Neil E Caporaso; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Maria Teresa Landi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ward; Paul A Schulte; Steve Bayard; Aaron Blair; Paul Brandt-Rauf; Mary Ann Butler; David Dankovic; Ann F Hubbs; Carol Jones; Myra Karstadt; Gregory L Kedderis; Ronald Melnick; Carrie A Redlich; Nathaniel Rothman; Russell E Savage; Michael Sprinker; Mark Toraason; Ainsley Weston; Andrew F Olshan; Patricia Stewart; Sheila Hoar Zahm
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.