Literature DB >> 33831330

Healthy Communication Partners Modify Their Speech When Conversing With Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.

Nichola Lubold1, Megan M Willi2, Stephanie A Borrie3, Tyson S Barrett4, Visar Berisha1.   

Abstract

Purpose For individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), conversational interactions can be challenging. Efforts to improve the success of these interactions have largely fallen on the individual with PD. Successful communication, however, involves contributions from both the individual with PD and their communication partner. The current study examines whether healthy communication partners naturally engage in different acoustic-prosodic behavior (speech compensations) when conversing with an individual with PD and, further, whether such behavior aids communication success. Method Measures of articulatory precision, speaking rate, and pitch variability were extracted from the speech of healthy speakers engaged in goal-directed dialogue with other healthy speakers (healthy-healthy dyads) and with individuals with PD (healthy-PD dyads). Speech compensations, operationally defined as significant differences in healthy speakers' acoustic-prosodic behavior in healthy-healthy dyads versus healthy-PD dyads, were calculated for the three speech behaviors. Finally, the relationships between speech behaviors and an objective measure of communicative efficiency were examined. Results Healthy speakers engaged in speech characterized by greater articulatory precision and slower speaking rate when conversing with individuals with PD relative to conversations with other healthy individuals. However, these adaptive speech compensations were not predictive of communicative efficiency. Conclusions Evidence that healthy speakers naturally engage in speech compensations when conversing with individuals with PD is novel, yet consistent with findings from studies with other populations in which conversation can be challenging. In the case of PD, these compensatory behaviors did not support communication outcomes. While preliminary in nature, the results raise important questions regarding the speech behavior of healthy communication partners and provide directions for future work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33831330      PMCID: PMC8608161          DOI: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  29 in total

1.  Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Megan J McAuliffe; Julie M Liss; Cecilia Kirk; Gregory A O'Beirne; Tim Anderson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-09-01

4.  Understanding dysrhythmic speech: When rhythm does not matter and learning does not happen.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Kaitlin L Lansford; Tyson S Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Do Conversational Partners Entrain on Articulatory Precision?

Authors:  Nichola Lubold; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Megan Willi; Visar Berisha
Journal:  Interspeech       Date:  2019-09

6.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  M A Picheny; N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-03

7.  Conversational Coordination of Articulation Responds to Context: A Clinical Test Case With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Camille J Wynn; Visar Berisha; Nichola Lubold; Megan M Willi; Carl A Coelho; Tyson S Barrett
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Acquired dysarthria in conversation: identifying sources of understandability problems.

Authors:  Steven Bloch; Ray Wilkinson
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Children's Acoustic and Linguistic Adaptations to Peers With Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Sonia Granlund; Valerie Hazan; Merle Mahon
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  Ageing and Parkinson's disease: why is advancing age the biggest risk factor?

Authors:  Amy Reeve; Eve Simcox; Doug Turnbull
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 10.895

View more
  3 in total

1.  Toward Empowering Conversational Agency in Aphasia: Understanding Mechanisms of Topic Initiation in People With and Without Aphasia.

Authors:  Marion C Leaman; Brent Archer; Lisa A Edmonds
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  From Speech Acoustics to Communicative Participation in Dysarthria: Toward a Causal Framework.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Camille J Wynn; Visar Berisha; Tyson S Barrett
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Zoë Thijs; Yan Zhang; Kristiane Van Lierde; Martine Vanryckeghem; Christopher R Watts
Journal:  Clin Park Relat Disord       Date:  2022-07-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.