| Literature DB >> 33829673 |
Xiaoxin Liu1,2, Xinxing Ju3, Xiaohong Liu1.
Abstract
AIM: To explore the mediating role of post-traumatic growth and perceived professional benefits between resilience and intent to stay among Chinese nurses to support Wuhan in managing COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Chinese nurses; intent to stay; perceived professional benefits; post-traumatic growth; resilience
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33829673 PMCID: PMC8251295 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.874
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nurs Open ISSN: 2054-1058
FIGURE 1Hypothesized relationships among resilience, post‐traumatic growth, perceived professional benefits, and intent to stay
The demographic characteristics of the study participants (N = 200)
| Demographic variable |
| % |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Female | 166 | 83.0 |
| Male | 34 | 17.0 |
| Age (years) | ||
| ≤30 | 89 | 44.5 |
| 31–40 | 93 | 46.5 |
| >40 | 18 | 9.0 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married/divorced | 126 | 63.0 |
| Single | 74 | 37.0 |
| Children's situation | ||
| One or more children | 109 | 54.5 |
| N/A | 91 | 45.5 |
| Education level | ||
| Technical secondary school | 4 | 2.0 |
| Junior college | 42 | 21.0 |
| College or above | 154 | 77.0 |
| Nursing experience (years) | ||
| ≤10 | 105 | 52.5 |
| 11–20 | 73 | 36.5 |
| >20 | 22 | 11.0 |
| Professional title | ||
| Nurse | 49 | 24.5 |
| Senior nurse | 92 | 46.0 |
| Primary nurse | 53 | 26.5 |
| Chief nurse | 6 | 3.0 |
| Position | ||
| General nurse | 150 | 75.0 |
| Clinical nursing teacher | 17 | 8.5 |
| Head nurse | 32 | 16.0 |
| Assistant nursing director | 1 | 0.5 |
| Department | ||
| Medicine department | 74 | 37.0 |
| Surgery department | 34 | 17.0 |
| Emergency department | 13 | 6.5 |
| ICU | 70 | 35.0 |
| Others | 9 | 4.5 |
| Ever previously been involved in public health emergencies | ||
| N/A | 190 | 95.0 |
| Yes | 10 | 5.0 |
| Rescue time (days) | ||
| ≤40 | 23 | 11.5 |
| 41–60 | 124 | 62.0 |
| >60 | 53 | 26.5 |
Description analysis and correlations of resilience, nurses’ perceived professional benefits, post‐traumatic growth and intent to stay
| Variable | Mean ± | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nurses’ perceived professional benefits | 4.33 ± 0.49 | |||||||||||||
| Positive occupational perception | 4.27 ± 0.55 | 0.919 | ||||||||||||
| Good nurse‐patient relationship | 4.36 ± 0.54 | 0.940 | 0.851 | |||||||||||
| Recognition from family, relatives, and friends | 4.40 ± 0.52 | 0.923 | 0.804 | 0.872 | ||||||||||
| Sense of belonging to a team | 4.32 ± 0.53 | 0.944 | 0.827 | 0.839 | 0.834 | |||||||||
| Self‐growth | 4.30 ± 0.49 | 0.946 | 0.807 | 0.845 | 0.828 | 0.913 | ||||||||
| Post‐traumatic growth | 3.18 ± 1.06 | 0.529 | 0.460 | 0.487 | 0.473 | 0.490 | 0.548 | |||||||
| Appreciation of life | 3.60 ± 1.08 | 0.500 | 0.426 | 0.465 | 0.476 | 0.457 | 0.509 | 0.930 | ||||||
| Personal strength | 3.50 ± 1.13 | 0.551 | 0.501 | 0.510 | 0.488 | 0.509 | 0.556 | 0.920 | 0.877 | |||||
| Relating to others | 3.01 ± 1.23 | 0.460 | 0.395 | 0.413 | 0.405 | 0.431 | 0.492 | 0.923 | 0.791 | 0.814 | ||||
| New possibilities | 2.95 ± 1.25 | 0.501 | 0.442 | 0.475 | 0.432 | 0.465 | 0.514 | 0.935 | 0.792 | 0.830 | 0.878 | |||
| Self‐transformation | 2.83 ± 1.21 | 0.445 | 0.384 | 0.399 | 0.385 | 0.420 | 0.478 | 0.917 | 0.787 | 0.771 | 0.833 | 0.847 | ||
| Intent to stay | 3.84 ± 0.6 | 0.689 | 0.644 | 0.629 | 0.633 | 0.659 | 0.653 | 0.434 | 0.412 | 0.473 | 0.363 | 0.397 | 0.374 | |
| Resilience | 3.13 ± 0.631 | 0.553 | 0.506 | 0.460 | 0.494 | 0.558 | 0.556 | 0.569 | 0.551 | 0.627 | 0.490 | 0.504 | 0.479 | 0.596 |
p < .05.
p < .01.
FIGURE 2Mediating effect of post‐traumatic growth
FIGURE 3Mediating effect of perceived professional benefits
FIGURE 4Structural equation model of intent to stay
Structural equation model fitting index
| Model | PMSEA | SRMR | GFI | NFI | IFI | CFI | RFI | TLI | PNFI | PCFI | PFGI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended value | ≤5 | ≤0.08 | ≤0.08 | ≥0.90 | ≥0.90 | ≥0.90 | ≥0.92 | ≥0.90 | ≥0.90 | >0.50 | >0.50 | >0.50 |
| Initial model | 1.960 | 0.070 | 0.041 | 0.928 | 0.966 | 0.983 | 0.983 | 0.953 | 0.977 | 0.703 | 0.715 | 0.571 |
| Structural model | 1.927 | 0.068 | 0.041 | 0.928 | 0.966 | 0.983 | 0.983 | 0.954 | 0.977 | 0.717 | 0.730 | 0.583 |
Abbreviations: CFI, comparative fit index; GFI, goodness of fit index; IFI, incremental fit index; NFI, normed fit index; PCFI, parsimony comparative fit index; PGFI, parsimony goodness fit index; PNFI, parsimony normed fit index; RESEA, root mean square error of approximation; RFI, relative fit index; SRMR, standardized residual mean root; TLI, Tucker‐Lewis index.
Direct and indirect effects of resilience on intent to stay
| Effect | Point estimate | Boot | Bias‐corrected 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper |
| |||
| Indirect effect 1: X→M2→Y | 0.194 | 0.038 | 0.122 | 0.273 | <.001 |
| Indirect effect 2: X→M1→M2→Y | 0.097 | 0.025 | 0.056 | 0.154 | <.001 |
| Indirect effect 1 versus Indirect effect 2 | 0.097 | 0.053 | −0.010 | 0.198 | .075 |
| Total indirect effect of X on Y | 0.290 | 0.036 | 0.226 | 0.368 | <.001 |
| Total direct effect of X on Y | 0.306 | 0.050 | 0.207 | 0.404 | <.001 |
| Total effect | 0.596 | 0.044 | 0.495 | 0.676 | <.001 |
N = 200. Number of bootstrap samples for bias‐corrected bootstrap confidence intervals: 5,000.
X, resilience; M1, post‐traumatic growth; M2, perceived professional benefits; Y, intent to stay.