Literature DB >> 32085839

Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Qiongni Chen1, Mining Liang2, Yamin Li3, Jincai Guo4, Dongxue Fei5, Ling Wang3, Li He1, Caihua Sheng1, Yiwen Cai1, Xiaojuan Li1, Jianjian Wang1, Zhanzhou Zhang1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32085839      PMCID: PMC7129426          DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30078-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry        ISSN: 2215-0366            Impact factor:   27.083


× No keyword cloud information.
In December, 2019, an outbreak of a novel coronavirus pneumonia occurred in Wuhan (Hubei, China), and subsequently attracted worldwide attention. By Feb 9, 2020, there were 37 294 confirmed and 28 942 suspected cases of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in China. Facing this large-scale infectious public health event, medical staff are under both physical and psychological pressure. To better fight the COVID-19 outbreak, as the largest top-class tertiary hospital in Hunan Province, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University undertakes a considerable part of the investigation of suspected patients. The hospital has set up a 24-h fever clinic, two mild suspected infection patient screening wards, and one severe suspected infection patient screening ward. In addition to the original medical staff at the infectious disease department, volunteer medical staff have been recruited from multiple other departments. The Second Xiangya Hospital—workplace of the chairman of the Psychological Rescue Branch of the Chinese Medical Rescue Association—and the Institute of Mental Health, the Medical Psychology Research Center of the Second Xiangya Hospital, and the Chinese Medical and Psychological Disease Clinical Medicine Research Center responded rapidly to the psychological pressures on staff. A detailed psychological intervention plan was developed, which mainly covered the following three areas: building a psychological intervention medical team, which provided online courses to guide medical staff to deal with common psychological problems; a psychological assistance hotline team, which provided guidance and supervision to solve psychological problems; and psychological interventions, which provided various group activities to release stress. However, the implementation of psychological intervention services encountered obstacles, as medical staff were reluctant to participate in the group or individual psychology interventions provided to them. Moreover, individual nurses showed excitability, irritability, unwillingness to rest, and signs of psychological distress, but refused any psychological help and stated that they did not have any problems. In a 30-min interview survey with 13 medical staff at The Second Xiangya Hospital, several reasons were discovered for this refusal of help. First, getting infected was not an immediate worry to staff—they did not worry about this once they began work. Second, they did not want their families to worry about them and were afraid of bringing the virus to their home. Third, staff did not know how to deal with patients when they were unwilling to be quarantined at the hospital or did not cooperate with medical measures because of panic or a lack of knowledge about the disease. Additionally, staff worried about the shortage of protective equipment and feelings of incapability when faced with critically ill patients. Many staff mentioned that they did not need a psychologist, but needed more rest without interruption and enough protective supplies. Finally, they suggested training on psychological skills to deal with patients' anxiety, panic, and other emotional problems and, if possible, for mental health staff to be on hand to directly help these patients. Accordingly, the measures of psychological intervention were adjusted. First, the hospital provided a place for rest where staff could temporarily isolate themselves from their family. The hospital also guaranteed food and daily living supplies, and helped staff to video record their routines in the hospital to share with their families and alleviate family members' concerns. Second, in addition to disease knowledge and protective measures, pre-job training was arranged to address identification of and responses to psychological problems in patients with COVID-19, and hospital security staff were available to be sent to help deal with uncooperative patients. Third, the hospital developed detailed rules on the use and management of protective equipment to reduce worry. Fourth, leisure activities and training on how to relax were properly arranged to help staff reduce stress. Finally, psychological counsellors regularly visited the rest area to listen to difficulties or stories encountered by staff at work, and provide support accordingly. More than 100 frontline medical staff can rest in the provided rest place, and most of them report feeling at home in this accomodation. Maintaining staff mental health is essential to better control infectious diseases, although the best approach to this during the epidemic season remains unclear.4, 5 The learning from these psychological interventions is expected to help the Chinese government and other parts of the world to better respond to future unexpected infectious disease outbreaks. This online publication has been corrected. The corrected version first appeared at thelancet.com/psychiatry on April 27, 2020
  4 in total

1.  The psychological impact of the SARS epidemic on hospital employees in China: exposure, risk perception, and altruistic acceptance of risk.

Authors:  Ping Wu; Yunyun Fang; Zhiqiang Guan; Bin Fan; Junhui Kong; Zhongling Yao; Xinhua Liu; Cordelia J Fuller; Ezra Susser; Jin Lu; Christina W Hoven
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus.

Authors:  Lijun Kang; Yi Li; Shaohua Hu; Min Chen; Can Yang; Bing Xiang Yang; Ying Wang; Jianbo Hu; Jianbo Lai; Xiancang Ma; Jun Chen; Lili Guan; Gaohua Wang; Hong Ma; Zhongchun Liu
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 27.083

3.  A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Peter W Horby; Frederick G Hayden; George F Gao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed.

Authors:  Yu-Tao Xiang; Yuan Yang; Wen Li; Ling Zhang; Qinge Zhang; Teris Cheung; Chee H Ng
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 27.083

  4 in total
  571 in total

1.  Mental health interventions for healthcare workers during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Spain.

Authors:  Amador Priede; Inés López-Álvarez; Diego Carracedo-Sanchidrián; César González-Blanch
Journal:  Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.318

2.  Economic hardship and mental health complaints during COVID-19.

Authors:  Dirk Witteveen; Eva Velthorst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Concerns, Perceived Impact, Preparedness in Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic and Health Outcomes among Italian Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Igor Portoghese; Federico Meloni; Maura Galletta; Ilenia Piras; Ernesto D'Aloja; Gabriele Finco; Marcello Campagna
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

4.  The association between witnessing patient death and mental health outcomes in frontline COVID-19 healthcare workers.

Authors:  Mariela Mosheva; Raz Gross; Nimrod Hertz-Palmor; Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon; Rachel Kaplan; Rony Cleper; Yitshak Kreiss; Doron Gothelf; Itai M Pessach
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.505

5.  [Roles of the public-facility-turned temporary hospital in prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China and clinical experience in the hospital].

Authors:  Chuan Wen; Ji-Dong Tian; Min Xie; Jun-Mei Xu
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-05

Review 6.  Preserving Access: A Review of Stroke Thrombectomy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  T M Leslie-Mazwi; K M Fargen; M Levitt; C P Derdeyn; S K Feske; A B Patel; J A Hirsch
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Among Patients with COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Malihe Sadat Moayed; Amir Vahedian-Azimi; Golshan Mirmomeni; Farshid Rahimi-Bashar; Keivan Goharimoghadam; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Mohsen Abbasi-Farajzadeh; Mostafa Hekmat; Thozhukat Sathyapalan; Paul C Guest; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic among US adults without a pre-existing mental health condition: Findings from American trend panel survey.

Authors:  Calliope Holingue; Elena Badillo-Goicoechea; Kira E Riehm; Cindy B Veldhuis; Johannes Thrul; Renee M Johnson; M Daniele Fallin; Frauke Kreuter; Elizabeth A Stuart; Luther G Kalb
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  The association of transmission concerns and social distance from loved ones with distress in medical professionals providing care during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City.

Authors:  Talea Cornelius; Andrea T Duran; Franchesca Diaz; Sean Bramley; Kaitlin Shaw; Joseph E Schwartz; Donald Edmondson; Ari Shechter; Marwah Abdalla
Journal:  Fam Syst Health       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 1.950

10.  The use of military planning techniques to manage outbreaks of novel infections in acute inpatient settings: development of an 'infection control estimate' (ICE).

Authors:  Matthew Oliver Wynn; Ryan George; Mark Cole
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2020-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.