Literature DB >> 33828936

Bioanalytical screening of low levels of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in pig meat (pork) for checking compliance with EU maximum and action levels using highly sensitive "third generation" recombinant H4L7.5c2 rat hepatoma cells.

Johannes Haedrich1,2, Claudia Stumpf1, Michael S Denison3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low maximum and action levels set by the European Union for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (DL-PCBs) in pig meat (pork) have led to a demand for reliable and cost-effective bioanalytical screening methods implemented upstream of gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry confirmatory technology, that can detect low levels of contamination in EU-regulated foods with quick turn-around times.
RESULTS: Based on the Chemically Activated LUciferase gene eXpression (CALUX) bioassay, extraction and clean-up steps were optimized for recovery and reproducibility within working ranges significantly lower than in current bioassays. A highly sensitive "3rd generation" recombinant rat hepatoma cell line (H4L7.5c2) containing 20 dioxin responsive elements was exposed to pork sample extracts, and their PCDD/Fs and DL-PCBs levels were evaluated by measuring luciferase activity. The method was validated according to the provisions of Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/644 of 5 April 2017 with spiking experiments performed selectively for PCDD/Fs and DL-PCBs and individual calibration for PCDD/Fs, DL-PCBs and the calculated sum of PCDD/Fs and DL-PCBs. The resulting performance parameters met all legal specifications as confirmed by re-calibration using authentic samples. Cut-off concentrations for assessing compliance with low maximum levels and action levels set for PCDD/Fs and DL-PCBs within a range of 0.50-1.25 pg WHO-TEQ/g fat were derived, ensuring low rates of false-compliant results (ß-error < 1%) and keeping the rate of false-noncompliant results well under control (α-error < 12%).
CONCLUSIONS: We present a fast and efficient bioanalytical routine method validated according to the European Union's legal requirements on the basis of authentic samples, allowing the analyst to reliably identify pork samples and any other EU-regulated foods of animal origin suspected to be noncompliant with a high level of performance and turn-around times of 52 h. This was facilitated in particular by a quick and efficient extraction step followed by selective clean-up, use of a highly sensitive "3rd generation" H4L7.5c2 recombinant rat hepatoma cell CALUX bioassay, and optimized assay performance with improved calibrator precision and reduced lack-of-fit errors. New restrictions are proposed for the calibrator bias and the unspecific background contribution to reportable results. The procedure can utilize comparably small sample amounts and allows an annual throughput of 840-1000 samples per lab technician. The described bioanalytical method contributes to the European Commission's objective of generating accurate and reproducible analytical results according to Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/644 across the European Union.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioanalytical screening; CALUX bioassay; Dioxin-like PCBs; Dioxins; EU Legislation; Pig meat

Year:  2021        PMID: 33828936      PMCID: PMC7973644          DOI: 10.1186/s12302-021-00474-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Eur        ISSN: 2190-4715            Impact factor:   5.893


  26 in total

1.  The five-parameter logistic: a characterization and comparison with the four-parameter logistic.

Authors:  Paul G Gottschalk; John R Dunn
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 3.365

2.  Appropriate calibration curve fitting in ligand binding assays.

Authors:  John W A Findlay; Robert F Dillard
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Importance of REP values when comparing the CALUX bioassay results with chemoanalyses results Example with spiked vegetable oils.

Authors:  Sophie Carbonnelle; Joris Van Loco; Ilse Van Overmeire; Isabelle Windal; Nathalie Van Wouwe; Stefan Van Leeuwen; Leo Goeyens
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2004-08-08       Impact factor: 6.057

Review 4.  An overview of the effects of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds on vertebrates, as documented in human and ecological epidemiology.

Authors:  Sally S White; Linda S Birnbaum
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Species-specific antagonism of Ah receptor action by 2,2',5,5'-tetrachloro- and 2,2',3,3'4,4'-hexachlorobiphenyl.

Authors:  J M Aarts; M S Denison; M A Cox; M A Schalk; P M Garrison; K Tullis; L H de Haan; A Brouwer
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1995-12-07       Impact factor: 4.432

6.  Calibration Curves in Quantitative Ligand Binding Assays: Recommendations and Best Practices for Preparation, Design, and Editing of Calibration Curves.

Authors:  Mitra Azadeh; Boris Gorovits; John Kamerud; Stephen MacMannis; Afshin Safavi; Jeffrey Sailstad; Perceval Sondag
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Risk for animal and human health related to the presence of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in feed and food.

Authors:  Helle Katrine Knutsen; Jan Alexander; Lars Barregård; Margherita Bignami; Beat Brüschweiler; Sandra Ceccatelli; Bruce Cottrill; Michael Dinovi; Lutz Edler; Bettina Grasl-Kraupp; Christer Hogstrand; Carlo Stefano Nebbia; Isabelle P Oswald; Annette Petersen; Martin Rose; Alain-Claude Roudot; Tanja Schwerdtle; Christiane Vleminckx; Günter Vollmer; Heather Wallace; Peter Fürst; Helen Håkansson; Thorhallur Halldorsson; Anne-Katrine Lundebye; Raimo Pohjanvirta; Lars Rylander; Andrew Smith; Henk van Loveren; Ine Waalkens-Berendsen; Marco Zeilmaker; Marco Binaglia; José Ángel Gómez Ruiz; Zsuzsanna Horváth; Eugen Christoph; Laura Ciccolallo; Luisa Ramos Bordajandi; Hans Steinkellner; Laurentius Ron Hoogenboom
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2018-11-20

8.  Enhancing the response of CALUX and CAFLUX cell bioassays for quantitative detection of dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Bin Zhao; David S Baston; Elaine Khan; Claudio Sorrentino; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Sci China Chem       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.445

9.  Concentration-dependent TCDD elimination kinetics in humans: toxicokinetic modeling for moderately to highly exposed adults from Seveso, Italy, and Vienna, Austria, and impact on dose estimates for the NIOSH cohort.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Robert C Brunet; Gaétan Carrier; Sean M Hays; Colleen A Cushing; Larry L Needham; Donald G Patterson; Pier Mario Gerthoux; Paolo Brambilla; Paolo Mocarelli
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01

10.  Species-specific recombinant cell lines as bioassay systems for the detection of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-like chemicals.

Authors:  P M Garrison; K Tullis; J M Aarts; A Brouwer; J P Giesy; M S Denison
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1996-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.