Literature DB >> 33828873

Occlusal Plane Changes After Molar Distalization With a Pendulum Appliance in Growing Patients with Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Cephalometric Study.

Marco Serafin1, Rosamaria Fastuca2, Elisabetta Castellani3, Alberto Caprioglio1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the skeletal and dental changes after distalization with a pendulum appliance in growing patients with Class II malocclusion, focusing on the occlusal plane (OP).
METHODS: The sample included 24 patients with Class II malocclusion (10 boys, 14 girls); their mean age was 12.1 years. All patients underwent molar distalization and had 2 serial cephalograms traced at baseline (T1) and after distalization (T2). Angular and linear dental changes were calculated by taking the sella-nasion (SN), palatal plane (PP), and pterygoid vertical as reference. OP inclination was compared with SN, PP, and mandibular plane. The collected data were computed for all the tested variables, and one-way paired t-test was used to assess the significance of the differences between the time points. α was set at 0.05. Multiple linear regressions were used to predict the OP changes.
RESULTS: The mean total treatment time was 8±2 months to obtain a super Class I molar relationship. In T1-T2 interval, statistically significant incisor buccal tipping of 5°±3.6° (p<0.05), first molar distal tipping of 8.9°±8.3° (p<0.001), and second molar tipping of 8.2°±8.1° (p<0.001) were observed. The maxillary first and second molars moved significantly backward by 2.8±3.2 mm (p<0.05) and 3.7±2.7 mm (p<0.001), respectively. Only the premolars showed a statistically significant anchorage loss of 2.7±3.3 mm (p<0.05); overjet increased significantly at 1.3±1.2 mm (p<0.05). Regarding the OP, none of the tested variables showed any statistically significant changes between T1-T2.
CONCLUSION: The pendulum appliance showed efficacy in distalizing the maxillary first and second molars at the expense of anterior anchorage loss. The OP did not show statistically significant changes after molar distalization. © Copyright 2021 by Turkish Orthodontic Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cephalometry; Class II Angle malocclusion; molar distalization; occlusal plane; pendulum appliance

Year:  2021        PMID: 33828873      PMCID: PMC7990272          DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Orthod        ISSN: 2148-9505


  30 in total

Review 1.  Upper molar distalization: a critical analysis.

Authors:  M F Sfondrini; V Cacciafesta; G Sfondrini
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.

Authors:  Acácio Fuziy; Renato Rodrigues de Almeida; Guilherme Janson; Fernanda Angelieri; Arnaldo Pinzan
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth.

Authors:  Eliana Midori Tanaka; Sadao Sato
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Renato Rodrigues de Almeida; Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; James A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 2: The effects of maxillary molar root uprighting bends.

Authors:  F K Byloff; M A Darendeliler; E Clar; A Darendeliler
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliance--in vitro analysis of the force systems and in vivo study in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Gero S M Kinzinger; Heiner Wehrbein; Peter R Diedrich
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique.

Authors:  J Ghosh; R S Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Intraoral maxillary molar distalization.

Authors:  Ingela Karlsson; Lars Bondemark
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Claude F Mossaz; Friedrich K Byloff; Stavros Kiliaridis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment in different dentoskeletal frames.

Authors:  Jin-le Li; Chung Kau; Min Wang
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.750

View more
  2 in total

1.  Skeletal, Dental and Soft Tissue Cephalometric Changes after Orthodontic Treatment of Dental Class II Malocclusion with Maxillary First Molar or First Premolar Extractions.

Authors:  Johan Willem Booij; Marco Serafin; Rosamaria Fastuca; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Alberto Caprioglio
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Does Early Treatment Improve Clinical Outcome of Class II Patients? A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Roland Männchen; Marco Serafin; Rosamaria Fastuca; Alberto Caprioglio
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.