Literature DB >> 9267574

Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 2: The effects of maxillary molar root uprighting bends.

F K Byloff1, M A Darendeliler, E Clar, A Darendeliler.   

Abstract

A clinical study was recently undertaken to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of the pendulum appliance (PA). In the present study, the appliance was modified by incorporating an uprighting bend into the distalizing spring during the second phase of treatment to avoid excessive distal tipping of the maxillary molars. The sample consisted of 20 patients: 8 females and 12 males, mean age 13.11 +/- 1.10 years. Eight of the patients were subjected to a slow rate of maxillary expansion. Measurements were obtained from cephalometric headfilms prior to (T1) and the day of removal (T2) of the PA. Treatment changes were analyzed and compared with the previous study. The PA with uprighting bends led to reduced molar tipping without significantly changing the effects of the PA, with the exceptions of 0.62 mm more anchorage loss of the maxillary incisor edge and increased treatment time. There was no significant difference in anchorage loss between the patients with and without maxillary expansion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9267574     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067<0261:DMMUTP>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  18 in total

1.  Class II treatment by palatal miniscrew-system appliance: A case report.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Giulia Occhiuto; Emanuele Paoletto; Bortolo Giuliano Maino; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Effects of conventional anchorage on premolar root development during treatment with a pendulum appliance.

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Cora Pantel; Björn Ludwig; Norbert Gülden; Bettina Glasl; Jörg Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Evaluation of the effects of the hybrid Pendulum in comparison with the conventional Pendulum appliance.

Authors:  Erdal Bozkaya; Tuba Tortop; Sema Yüksel; Emine Kaygısız
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Treatment efficiency of mini-implant-borne distalization depending on age and second-molar eruption.

Authors:  M Nienkemper; B Wilmes; A Pauls; S Yamaguchi; B Ludwig; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Distalization pattern of the maxillary arch depending on the number of orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Till E Bechtold; Jin-Wook Kim; Tae-Hyun Choi; Young-Chel Park; Kee-Joon Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalization.

Authors:  Mümin Kırcalı; Alime Sema Yüksel
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-12-01

7.  Occlusal Plane Changes After Molar Distalization With a Pendulum Appliance in Growing Patients with Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Cephalometric Study.

Authors:  Marco Serafin; Rosamaria Fastuca; Elisabetta Castellani; Alberto Caprioglio
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-02-23

8.  Reader's Forum.

Authors:  Cheol-Hyun Moon
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy using pendulum and distal screw appliances.

Authors:  Alberto Caprioglio; Alessandra Cafagna; Mattia Fontana; Mauro Cozzani
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Comparison of maxillary molar distalization with an implant-supported distal jet and a traditional tooth-supported distal jet appliance.

Authors:  Mauro Cozzani; Marco Pasini; Francesco Zallio; Robert Ritucci; Sabrina Mutinelli; Laura Mazzotta; Maria Rita Giuca; Vincenzo Piras
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.